Interview with Robert D. Fulk

Author / Editor
Grant, Colin J.

Title
Interview with Robert D. Fulk

Published
Journal of English Linguistics 42 (2014): 359-79.

Description
Fulk extols two collaborative editions of Chaucer for their excellent textual editing: The Variorum Chaucer by Ruggiers and Ransom, and Benson's Riverside Chaucer; additionally, praises Peter Robinson's digital Canterbury Tales Project. Warns against "complacency" in the face of increasing manuscript digitization, and recommends the Middle English Grammar Corpus, by Merja Stenroos et al., as a worthy instance of such encoding for scholarly use.

Contributor
Fulk, Robert D.

Chaucer Subjects
Facsimiles, Editions, and Translations
Manuscripts and Textual Studies