<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277635">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Troilus en Criseyde: Gedicht door Geoffrey Chaucer omstreeks 1385.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Translation of TC into Dutch verse, with notes and introduction.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277634">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Medieval Madwoman in the Attic: Chaucer&#039;s Wife of Bath in &quot;The Canterbury Tales.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that in &quot;attempting the pen&quot; by telling her own story, the Wife of Bath rebels against patriarchal strictures and escapes suggestions of madness that beset such rebellious women in late medieval England.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277633">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hybridity in Geoffrey Chaucer&#039;s &quot;The Canterbury Tales&quot;: Reconstructing Estate Boundaries.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes the &quot;large scale social mobility&quot; of late medieval England and argues that its modifications of traditional estates categories are reflected in CT. Uses Homi Bhabha&#039;s &quot;postcolonial concepts of hybridity, in-betweenness, third space and mimicry&quot; to explore the flexibility of the social estates of the Knight, Monk, Prioress, Franklin, and Miller. In English, with an abstract in Turkish.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277631">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Complete Rime-index to Manly &amp; Rickert&#039;s Text of &quot;The Canterbury Tales.&quot; Part One, A.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Item not seen. Information derived from WorldCat record.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277630">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Humorous Structures of English Narratives, 1200-1600.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Tests several theories of humor--especially Victor Raskin and Salvatore Attardo&#039;s &quot;General Theory of Verbal Humor&quot; (1985) and Thomas D. Cooke&#039;s &quot;Comic Climax&quot; (1978)--for their value in analyzing Elizabethan jests and medieval fabliaux, parodies, and—as counter examples—tragedies. Focuses on narratological structures and stylistic devices in a number of texts, including Chaucer&#039;s fabliaux--MilT, RvT, SumT, MerT, and ShT--exploring how, if, and to what extent they are funny and how useful the theories are in explaining their humor.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277629">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer’s Man of Law and Clerk as Rhetoricians: Narrative and Dramatic Levels of Decorum.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Shows how MLT and ClT &quot;prove Chaucer&#039;s functional use of rhetoric for purposes of decorum,&quot; considering the characterizations of the narrators&#039;, their uses of rhetoric, and their intentions. Considers source materials, comments on the Wife of Bath, and argues for Chaucer&#039;s &quot;hitherto unrecognized achievement in decorum.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277628">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Plowman&#039;s Tale.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A critical edition of the &quot;Plowman&#039;s Tale,&quot; with notes, glossary, and extensive critical commentary, including discussion of it as an example of Chaucerian apocrypha. Also includes discussion of its relation to &quot;Piers Plowman,&quot; the &quot;Pilgrim&#039;s Tale,&quot; Lollardy, and the English Reformation.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277627">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[&quot;Blyndes Bestes&quot;: Aspects of Chaucer&#039;s Animal World.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores the sources and meanings of Chaucer&#039;s &quot;analogies&quot; between animals and humans, focusing on hares, dogs, horses, wolves, and sheep, arguing that, generally, Chaucer uses them to indicate the need for humans to control their &quot;natural passions.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277626">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Concepts of Love in Dante and Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes the hierarchical, mystical, Italianate view of love that emphasizes the gentle heart, epitomized in Dante, exploring its influence on Chaucer in TC, comparing and contrasting Chaucer&#039;s lovers with Paolo and Francesca as well as Dante and Beatrice.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277625">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Shapeshifting and Associated Phenomena as Conventions of the Middle English Metrical Romances.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Traces the &quot;shapeshifting motif&quot; in English literature from &quot;Beowulf&quot; to the late-medieval metrical romances, focusing on the latter. Chapter five includes attention to WBT as an example of the &quot;human-to-human type of shapeshift,&quot; along with seven other romances.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277624">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Similes in the Works of Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses Chaucer&#039;s uses of various kinds of similes and similetic comparisons--Homeric, epic similes; biblical &quot;similitudes&quot;; proverbial comparisons, Ovidian and Dantean comparisons; and more--demonstrating his variety, borrowings, and adaptations. Assesses Chaucer&#039;s techniques across various genres throughout his corpus, both poetry and prose.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277622">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Lucio Anneo Séneca en Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comments on Senecan material in several of the CT (MkT; ManT, WBP, and Mel) and on Chaucer’s access to Senecan sources.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277621">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Comparative Study of Scansion in Chaucer&#039;s Troilus and Criseyde and Canterbury Tales. ]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Item not seen.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277620">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Juxtaposed Adjectives in &quot;Troilus and Criseyde.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Item not seen.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277619">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Study on the Adjectives Modifying Criseyde.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses the characterization of Criseyde in TC in light of the adjectives she uses and those used of her by the narrator, Troilus, and Pandarus, helping to characterize them as well. Includes comparable data from Boccaccio&#039;s &quot;Filostrato.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277618">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The &quot;Artes Praedicandi&quot; and the Use of Illustrative Material by Chaucer&#039;s Canterbury Preachers.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Offers &quot;close analysis of the use of &#039;sententiae&#039; and narrative &#039;exempla&#039;,&quot; exploring NPT, WBT, PardT, SumT, and ParsT in light of &quot;traditional and late medieval sermon theory and practice&quot; evident in the &quot;artes praedicandi&quot; and in medieval &quot;conceptions of the Christian preacher and the sermon.&quot; Argues that ParsT &quot;provides the orthodox answer to the false preaching of those who have preceded him.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277617">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer the Love Poet: A Study in Historical Criticism.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Separates medieval ideas of love (primarily Ovidian and Augustianian) from Romantic and post-Romantic ideas, and argues that Chaucer &quot;was unquestionably a man of his time--an orthodox member of the Church and a firm follower of the teachings of St. Augustine in matters of art as in ethics.&quot; In matters of love (especially in PF, TC, and KnT), he &quot; consistently subscribes to Augustinian doctrines of nature, grace, and sexual morality.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277615">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Landowner&#039;s Book of Courtly Love: Languages of Lordship and the &quot;Confessio amantis.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Item not seen. Kendall&#039;s abstract indicates that the &quot;vision poetry&quot; of both Chaucer and Sir John Clanvowe share &quot;discursive territory&quot; with Gower&#039;s &quot;Confessio Amantis,&quot; particularly &quot;concepts of the late fourteenth-century aristocratic household and the social structures it supported,&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277614">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Comic Dimension: A New Reading of William Carlos Williams&#039; Long Poem &quot;Paterson.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores aspects of Williams&#039; development of his poetic identity, including the importance of Chaucer as a model, emphasizing the modern poet&#039;s knowledge of Chaucer and Chaucer criticism and his emulation in &quot;Paterson&quot; of Chaucer&#039;s comic techniques.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277613">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Loves Hete Celestial: Earthly and Divine Love in Chaucer&#039;s Poetry.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Clarifies the interdependence of romantic love and the ascent of the mind to God in medieval theology, philosophy, and Chaucer&#039;s works, especially HF, PF, LGW, and portions of CT. Argues that many of Chaucer&#039;s characters &quot;with specious critical reputations, such as the Wife of Bath, the Pardoner, Pandarus and Criseyde, may have more benevolent, Christian inclinations than previously supposed.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277612">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Study of the Modes of Imagination.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Contemplates &quot;fantasy, identification, and the imagination itself&quot; as response modes in the process of reading, exploring their &quot;distinctive epistemological implications and significance for identity.&quot; Includes comments on works by Chaucer (especially FranT) and Franz Kafka to exemplify how irony can deflect or disrupt &quot;the natural impulse to identify ourselves with a narrator&quot; and &quot;blind us to his or her unreliability.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277611">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Solar Pageant: An Astrological Reading of the Canterbury Tales.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Correlates the &quot;twenty-four &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;&quot; with the twelve signs of the zodiac, observing two binary oppositions of the zodiacal signs in the &quot;main characters&quot; of each tale as they &quot;symbolize parts of the body in the &quot;astrological medical melothesia.&quot; Proposes a revision to the order of the parts of the CT (with Part 2 separating Parts 4 and 5 in the Ellesmere order), and suggests that Chaucer intended CT to be the &quot;fifth part&quot; of Astr.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277610">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Poetics of the Past, Politics of the Present: Chaucer, Gower, and Old Books.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[&quot;This thesis examines the poetics and politics of ‘olde bokes’ (Legend of Good Women, G, 25) in selected works by Chaucer and Gower, paying particular attention to the way in which both writers appropriate their sources and the theories of history and political ideas informing these appropriations. It argues that Chaucer eschews metanarratives in his appropriations of the past and its writings, emphasising the multiplicity of voices that are contained in written discourse across time.&quot; Focuses on HF, PF, TC, Mel, and NPT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277609">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Trojan Wars: Genre and the Politics of Authorship in Late Medieval and Early Modern England.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores &quot;the historiographic importance of Troy . . . in the formation of an English literary tradition as defined by the idea of authorship and negotiated through genre . . . . particularly epic, romance and history.&quot; Studies the sources and intertextualities of TC, Lydgate&#039;s &quot;Troy Book,&quot; Caxton&#039;s &quot;Recuyell of the Histories of Troye&quot; and &quot;Eneydos,&quot; and Shakespeare&#039;s &quot;Troilus and Cressida,&quot; to show how &quot;authorial identity is expressed textually&quot; in each of them &quot;through the negotiation of genre and competing narrative forms,&quot; along with issues of national identity and political interest.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/omeka/items/show/277608">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Mnemosyne&#039;s Song: Chaucer, Translation, and the Creation of English Textual Memory.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Shows how three &quot;theoretical concerns are fundamental to Chaucer&#039;s art&quot;: &quot;the nature of translation, the construction of textual memory, and the relationship between reading and ethics.&quot; Explores how in his dream visions, Chaucer &quot;experiments with the use of rhetorical and mnemonic loci&quot; to produce &quot;brilliant ekphrastic moments and a uniquely architectural poetics&quot;; how he explores ambiguity and translation through neologism in TC; and how through MilT, ParsT, and Ret he investigates &quot;the relationship between texts, memory, and ethics.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>