Browse Items (16472 total)

Singh, Devani.   Chaucer Review 51.04 (2016): 478-502.
Focuses on three letters that preface Thomas Speght's Chaucer editions, which "conceive, invite, and attempt to influence their audiences." Argues that these letters reveal that the intended audience included both the established audience for Chaucer…

Teramura, Misha.   Chaucer Review 51.04 (2016): 503-14.
Shows that "what is thought to be the earliest record of a Chaucer folio in North America in fact refers to a text by the Protestant theologian Daniel Chamier." Concludes "with a brief survey of other early American readers of Chaucer."

Saunders, Corinne.   Chaucer Review 51.1 (2016): 11-30.
Discusses "the power of affect on minds and bodies" and the "psychology of love and loss" in Chaucer's works. Explores relationship between women's literary culture and roles of women in BD, KnT, TC, and LGW.

Warren, Nancy Bradley.   Chaucer Review 51.1 (2016): 88-106.
Considers ways that female monastic readers in Amesbury and Syon may have read and used works by Chaucer, Thomas Hoccleve, and John Lydgate. Claims that these "Chaucerian tradition" writings helped influence the devotional culture of female monastic…

Mosser, Daniel W., and Linne R. Mooney.   Chaucer Review 51.2 (2016): 131-50.
Analyzes the paleography and spelling of the fifteen manuscripts belonging to the hooked-g group, including three CT manuscripts, identifying two separate scribes and several collaborators. Includes four tables, six b&w illustrations, and an appendix…

James-Maddocks, Holly.   Chaucer Review 51.2 (2016): 151-86.
Analyzes the border illustrations and other codicological features of twelve manuscripts of the hooked-g group of manuscripts (including three CT manuscripts), using them to construct a "tentative chronology" of the dates of production and the…

Rogers, Cynthia A.   Chaucer Review 51.2 (2016): 187-208.
Argues that Pity is both a "clever critique" of the French lyric genre of complaint and "loving homage" to it, assessing aspects of exaggeration, repetition, structure, conventional theme and diction, wordplay, etc. as evidence that the poem evokes…

Nielsen, Melinda E.   Chaucer Review 51.2 (2016): 209-26.
Considers how the interrelated texts and glosses in CUL, MS Ii.III.21 depict in nuanced ways the gender of Lady Philosophy, focusing on Chaucer's emphasis in Bo of her "norisschyng" of Boethius as teacher, physician, and wet-nurse. While translating…

Baechle, Sarah.   Chaucer Review 51.2 (2016): 248-68.
Reads the manuscript glosses to TC in Cambridge, St. John's College, MS L.i and Cambridge, University Library, MS Gg.IV.27 as an "experimental early step toward the more elaborate marginal apparatus" in CT manuscripts. The TC glosses reflect a…

Godlove, Shannon.   Chaucer Review 51.3 (2016): 269-94.
Connects the complicated relationship among FranT's three main characters and the political relationship of England, France, and Brittany. Asserts that each character symbolizes one of these places and shows how the dynamics of love and sex merge…

Twomey, Michael W., and Scott D. Stull.   Chaucer Review 51.3 (2016): 310-37.
Analyzes the two houses in RvT and MilT and contends that Chaucer's precise description of architectural setting displays how architecture shaped medieval social life and communicated social and class satire.

Quinn, William A.   Chaucer Review 51.3 (2016): 338-81.
Investigates TC fragments as a window into how Chaucer's first readers experienced and interpreted his works.

Espie, Jeff, and Sarah Star.   Chaucer Review 51.3 (2016): 382-401.
Examines Chaucer's original characterization of Calkas through the ways it diverges from the representation of this character in earlier versions. Chaucer presents him as a human individual whose words are not necessarily to be trusted, introducing…

Saraceni, Madeleine L.   Chaucer Review 51.4 (2016): 403-35.
Explores what Chaucer's use of genres strongly associated with female readers--such as vernacular devotional writing, conduct literature, and hagiography--suggests about his attitudes toward women. Examines the significance of the catalogue of…

Matsuda, Takami   Chaucer Review 51.4 (2016): 436-52.
Explores how memory functions in contrition and confession in ParsT.

Timmis, Patrick.   Chaucer Review 51.4 (2016): 453-68.
Contends that Cresseid's maturation in Henryson's "Testament of Cresseid" includes an evolving contemplation of free will, as one finds in Boethius and in Chaucer's depiction of Troilus in TC.

Beidler, Peter G.   Chaucer Review 51.4 (2016): 518-19.
Notes that H. Rider Haggard mentions Chaucer in "King Solomon's Mines."

Dumitrescu, Irina.   Chaucer Review 52.1 (2017): 106-23.
Explores the role of the narrator in LGW as being culpable in his deception by telling idealized stories of women who suffer and die.

Collette, Carolyn.   Chaucer Review 52.1 (2017): 12-28.
Investigates Chaucer's multiple registers of speech in order to explore social harmony and discord in LGW as it pertains to women's desires.

Cook, Megan L.   Chaucer Review 52.1 (2017): 124-42.
Claims that LGW may have been viewed in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries as a response to TC and as an allegory for how Chaucer may have interacted with patrons.

Warren, Nancy Bradley.   Chaucer Review 52.1 (2017): 143-61.
Looks at how Bossewell's "Workes of Armorie" uses LGW, WBT, and BD in exploration of the construction of masculine identity.

Dinshaw, Carolyn.   Chaucer Review 52.1 (2017): 162-66.
Provides an afterword to the special issue on LGW, focusing on the theme of love's loss, and presents an argument that Prince's song "When You Were Mine" provides a foil for the women of LGW.

Schwebel, Leah.   Chaucer Review 52.1 (2017): 29-45.
Argues that Chaucer employs Livy's and Augustine's stories of Lucretia as a way to hold up feminine virtue, rather than repeating their negative attributes exhibited in the source material.

McCormick, Betsy, Leah Schwebel, and Lynn Shutters.   Chaucer Review 52.1 (2017): 3-11.
Explores why LGW unsettles readers and outlines this special issue of "Chaucer Review."

Cole, Andrew.   Chaucer Review 52.1 (2017): 46-65.
Examines the ways in which Gower and Chaucer use their source material differently. Gower uses Ovid to emphasize morality while Chaucer uses Ovid to explore both the courtly and the romantic.
Output Formats

atom, dc-rdf, dcmes-xml, json, omeka-xml, rss2

Not finding what you expect? Click here for advice!