<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271732">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Action and Passion in Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Troilus&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that TC &quot;gains psychological interest and what may be called a novelistic effect&quot; through adaptation of the &quot;to do and to suffer&quot; topos. Troilus is &quot;a man of passion who suffers,&quot; Pandarus is &quot;a man of action who contrives,&quot; and Criseyde &quot;alternately suffers and acts,&quot; seeking to act without ever achieving agency.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264107">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Acts of Interpretation: The Text in its Contexts, 700-1600: Essays on Medieval and Renaissance Literature in Honor of E. Talbot Donaldson]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[For ten essays that pertain to Chaucer, search for Acts of Interpretation under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270746">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Acts of Recognition: Essays on Medieval Culture]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Ten essays by Patterson on historical criticism, teaching medieval studies, Clanvowe, Hoccleve, Lydgate, Chaucer, Saint Francis, etc.; nine of the ten essays are reprinted. For the one essay published here for the first time that pertains to Chaucer, see &quot;Genre and Source in &#039;Troilus and Criseyde&#039;.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270636">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Adam Pinkhurst and the Copying of British Library, MS Additional 35287 of the B Version of Piers Plowman]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Palaeographical differences between the hands of the Hengwrt and Ellesmere manuscripts of CT and of Additional 35287 are more compelling than are the similarities. Horobin suggests that Pinkhurst &quot;was not Chaucer&#039;s personal copyist&quot; and focuses on the probability that there was &quot;more cooperation between independent scriveners than we have traditionally allowed.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270635">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Adam Pinkhurst, Geoffrey Chaucer, and the Hengwrt Manuscript of the Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A petition in the hand of Pinkhurst requesting that a permanent deputy be appointed to relieve Chaucer of his duties as controller of the wool custom establishes their connection in 1385. However, codicological evidence suggests that the poet &quot;was no longer available for consultation&quot; on the production of Hengwrt even as it provides further proof of collaborative scribal practice in late medieval London.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273982">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Adam Pinkhurst&#039;s Short and Long Forms.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Presents and discusses tabular data from the Hengwrt and Ellesmere manuscripts of CT, copied by Adam Pinkhurst, to show how &quot;codicological and palaeographical context&quot; can affect orthography and abbreviation in late medieval English manuscripts.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271576">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Adam Pynkhurst&#039;s &#039;Necglygence and Rape&#039; Reassessed]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The author addresses the question whether Chaucer had Adam Pynkhurst in mind when berating his scribe Adam for his sloppy work and, on the basis of palaeographical evidence, seeks to determine whether Pynkhurst&#039;s performance improved afterwards.  To round off her argument, Sánchez-Marti further discusses the possibility that the &quot;Gawain&quot; scribe may have taken part in the supervision of the Ellesmere MS.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274892">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Adam Scriveyn and Chaucer&#039;s Metrical Practice.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Exemplifies how metrical phonology (&quot;the linguistic forms that fill out metre&quot;) supports A. S. G. Edwards&#039;s claim (in &quot;Chaucer and &#039;Adam Scriveyn,&#039; &quot; MÆ 81 [2002]) that Chaucer may not have written the lyric Adam. In line 3, &quot;longe&quot; and &quot;lokkes&quot; scan as monosyllables, but Chaucer&#039;s use of these and similar words is disyllabic elsewhere, and such disyllabic usage was for Chaucer &quot;virtually non-negotiable.&quot; Metrical evidence suggests fifteenth-century authorship, and the rime royal stanza suggests the era&#039;s &quot;nascent cult of Chaucer.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268745">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Adam Scriveyn and the Falsifiers of Dante&#039;s Inferno : A New Interpretation of Chaucer&#039;s Wordes]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Associates Adam with Dante&#039;s &quot;counterfeiter,&quot; Adam of Brescia. The two characters share a name, the same thematic occupation, and a disease: scale.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276698">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Adam Scriveyn in Cyberspace: Loss, Labour, Ideology, and Infrastructure in Interoperable Reuse of Digital Manuscript Metadata.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Advocates &quot;a book historical approach to digitized texts,&quot; seeking &quot;to promote a codicology of the &#039;digital&#039; medieval book,&quot; exposing various problems and inconsistencies in the uses of metadata in digital medieval studies. Refers to Adam and to TC 5.1793-99 as concerned with analogous problems.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268879">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Adam, &#039;The First Stocke,&#039; and the Political Context of Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Gentilesse&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that &quot;fader&quot; in the first line of Gent refers to prelapsarian Adam, evidence of Chaucer&#039;s &quot;modest egalitarianism.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267898">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Adam, and Chaucer&#039;s Words unto Him]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Adam is a more complex work than generally thought, evoking Adam the &quot;first father&quot; and &quot;the earthly instrument of chaos and capriciousness.&quot; The scribe&#039;s &quot;long lokkes&quot; link him to Chaucer&#039;s other prideful, foppish characters. The threatened &quot;scabbes&quot; would deface his hair and mirror the act of &quot;rubbing and scraping the manuscript.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274950">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Adam&#039;s Hell.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores the juxtaposition of the accounts of Lucifer and Adam in the opening of MkT (7.1999-2014), surveying medieval theological and Old and Middle English literary traditions of Adam&#039;s time in hell or, alternatively, limbo, and arguing that Chaucer&#039;s version assumes that Adam&#039;s ages-long suffering was relieved by Christ&#039;s descent into hell after his crucifixion.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275645">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Adaptation as Translation: A Fifteenth-Century Chaucerian Case.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Contrasts medieval Augustinian views of translation with those of modern translation theory and practice, applying the former to the adaptation/translation of CkT found in Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Bodley 686. Argues that the Bodley scribe constructed his version of the tale because, assuming that Chaucer &quot;intended to write a chastising narrative,&quot; he followed Augustinian practices and incorporated various features of fifteenth-century moral literary discourse in a Langlandian mode.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270474">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Add Context and Stir, Or, the Sadness of Grendel: Thoughts on Early Modern Orality and Literacy]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Challenges various assumptions about fundamental differences between oral and literate composition, assessing various features of folktale, drama, and narrative in early English culture. Cites MilT as an example where &quot;legend&quot; becomes a short story, by way of its &quot;densely-textured detail&quot; and specificity, and argues that the &quot;heavily-subordinative writerly syntax&quot; of the opening of the GP evinces a kind of &quot;lay literacy&quot; among aural audiences.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277150">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Addenda: One Middle English Manuscript and Four Editions of Medieval Works Known to J. R. R. Tolkien and What They Reveal.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Includes photostats of Cambridge, Peterhouse, MS 75.I (Equat) among several additions to &quot;Section A&quot; of Oronzo Cilli&#039;s &quot;Tolkien&#039;s Library: An Annotated Checklist&quot; (Edinburgh: Luna Press, 2019), and comments on Tolkien&#039;s concern with scribal corruption in Chaucer&#039;s works and his own.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266339">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Additional 35286 and the Order of the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In determining Chaucer&#039;s plan for CT, too much attention has been placed on the Ellesmere and Hengwrt manuscripts at the expense of the other eighty-one manuscripts, where the order of the tales may differ. In Ad3 (British Library MS Additional 35286), CkP and CkT fall between ManT and CYP; SNT, between SumT and ClP.  Such variations provide for alternative readings of various groups of tales.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271798">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Additional Eighteenth-Century Materials on Middle English in the Hunterian Collection of the Glasgow University Library]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Adds to the group of manuscripts identified by Carl Grindley in 1995 (one of which was a concordance to the works of Chaucer), two more written in the same hand: MSS 621 and 622. The former is on the grammar of Robert of Gloucester, the latter on that of John Wyclif.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263658">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Additions to the Golden Mountain: Four Recent Books on Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A review article.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271129">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Addressing the Bed: Towards a Premodern Poetics of Lost Love]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes the tradition of the rhetorical topos of the abandoned lover&#039;s apostrophe to the bed, considering the &quot;gendered&quot; fetishism of Ariadne&#039;s address in LGW, the description of Alceste in LGWP, Troilus&#039;s address to the empty house in TC, and Dido in LGW and HF.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262303">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Adjectival Inflexion Relics and Speech Rhythm in Late Middle and Early Modern English]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reviews scholarly treatment of the subject with reference to Chaucer and Gower.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273017">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Administrative Records and Scribal Achievement]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Anayzes scribal activity in medieval English administrative documents, and contends that Adam Pinkhurst, and other English scribes, may have been involved  in &quot;both literary and documentary work.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263105">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Adventures with the Adversative Conjunction in the General Prologue to the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;; or, What&#039;s before the &#039;but&#039;?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[On Chaucer&#039;s use in GP of the adversative conjunction &quot;but.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269572">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Adventurous Custance: St. Thomas of Acre and Chaucer&#039;s Man of Law&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Warner examines affiliations of the London Church of St. Thomas of Acre with mercantile interests that, in turn, help to clarify features of MLT, including its concerns with merchants, with the Crusades, and with legal discourse. MLT also explores modes of adventuring.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268044">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Adverbial Function in English Verse: The Case of Thus]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The article assesses the range of function and the frequency of &quot;thus&quot; in representative samples of English poetry from Old English through the twentieth century. Data derived from electronic searches (1000-line samples) confirm relations between style and function in the epic mode. Chaucer&#039;s use of the word is unusually low.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>