<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276328">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Poetry Anthology.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[An introduction to poetry for classroom use, with an anthology that includes MercB, Ros, Truth, and Purse, with notes and glosses, based on the edition of F. N. Robinson.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271618">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Polish Analogue of the &#039;Man of Law&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Summarizes the plot of the sixteenth-century Polish romance, &quot;Historia o Cesar zu Otone,&quot; observing how a number of its motifs are paralleled in vernacular analogues, including MLT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268608">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Political Pamphleteer in Late Medieval England : Thomas Fovent, Geoffrey Chaucer, Thomas Usk, and the Merciless Parliament of 1388]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores the identity and political career of Thomas Fovent (Favent), author of the polemical treatise on the Merciless Parliament--&quot;Historia Mirabilis Parliament&quot;--arguing that the treatise is best regarded as a &quot;pamphlet,&quot; an index to the public opinion of the age, not partisan propaganda. Oliver compares and contrasts Fovent&#039;s political savvy and caution with those of Chaucer and Usk.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265027">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Possible Pun on Chaucer&#039;s Name]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The word &quot;soutere&quot; (shoemaker) in CT 1.3904 may possibly be a pun on &quot;Chaucer&quot; (Fr. &quot;chaussier&quot;, shoemaker).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262981">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Possible Source for Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Summoner&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A late-fifteenth-century French collection of riddles (Musee Conde Bibliotheque MS 654) may point to an origin of SumT in a familiar riddle rather than in the iconography of Pentecost.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262044">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Possible Source of Chaucer&#039;s Error in the &#039;Legend of Hypermnestra&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The progenitor of error may have been Lactantius Placidus&#039; commentary on the &quot;Thebaid&quot;.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274061">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Postmodern Chaucer or a Postmodern Coloring? &quot;The Canterbury Tales.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys commentary on Chaucer&#039;s uses of postmodern techniques in CT, focusing on his experimentation and evasiveness, and his concern with meaning and with the possibilities whereby literature may or may not be considered literal. Discusses metafictive aspects of CT as &quot;a cavalcade of language users.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266907">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Postmodern Performance: Counter-Reading Chaucer&#039;s Clerk&#039;s Tale and Maxine Hong Kingston&#039;s &#039;No Name Woman&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Both ClT and Kingston&#039;s &quot;No Name Woman&quot; reveal how patriarchal culture operates to disguise male complicity in women&#039;s repression, and both connect issues of knowledge and power with the construction of subjectivity, showing how these are intimately tied up with the construction of sexual difference.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Clerk takes issue with Petrarch&#039;s religious moral that erases gender, and argues that clerks-the class that controls knowledge-choose not to tell of women&#039;s suffering and forbearance. Kingston tells the story despite familial collusion in her father&#039;s desire to erase her aunt&#039;s existence.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275398">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Postscript to Chaucer Studies.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Responds to critiques of two books previously published by the author--&quot;Some Types of Narrative in Chaucer&#039;s Poetry&quot; (1954) and &quot;The Golden Mirror: Studies on Chaucer&#039;s Descriptive Technique and Its Literary Background&quot; (1955)--seeking to clarify goals and emphases and to justify methodologies.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265653">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Pragmatic Approach to the Wife of Bath&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Pragmatic analysis suggests that the Wife of Bath in WBP and the loathly lady in WBT flout the &quot;Quality and Quantity maxims of the Cooperative Principle&quot; and the &quot;maxims of Tact&quot; of the &quot;Politeness Principle.&quot;  Targets of Chaucer&#039;s satire, the two characters seek to &quot;manipulate rather than cooperate.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275321">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Preface to Chaucer: Studies in Medieval Perspectives.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Articulates an allegorical approach to medieval literature (also called patristic, exegetical, Augustinian, historical, or iconographical criticism), clarifying its assumptions and methods and applying them to Chaucer&#039;s works and to works that precede or influenced him by Boethius, Jean de Meun, Alain de Lille, Andreas Capellanus, and others. Provides methodological background and source material for allegorical interpretations derived from Scripture, scriptural and classical commentaries, visual arts, medieval literary and aesthetic theories, and &quot;doctrines&quot; of love. Assesses the Christian meanings of most of Chaucer&#039;s works, with the most sustained attention given to TC, KnT, MilT, and WBP.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268340">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Previously Unnoticed Fragment of Chaucer&#039;s Treatise on the Astrolabe]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Eagleton identifies a fragment of Astr washed from MS 358 in the Royal College of Physicians, London. Reproduces the explicit that names Chaucer as author; six photographs; and two tables.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267282">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Previously Unnoticed Manuscript of Chaucer&#039;s Treatise on the Astrolabe]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Trinity College, Cambridge MS R.14.52 contains a late-fifteenth-century fragment of Astr. Its contents help illuminate previous copies of Astr and show Chaucer as a &quot;compiler,&quot; creating a treatise out of which &quot;other such treatises could be put together.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268560">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Project for a Comprehensive Collation of the Hengwrt and Ellesmere Manuscripts of The Canterbury Tales : The General Prologue]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Project proposal for a computer-assisted comparison of the Hengwrt and Ellesmere manuscripts of CT, focusing on how the manuscripts represent compound words, the use of double and single letters, the omission and addition of letters, the use of abbreviations and expanded forms, and the use of capital or noncapital letters.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270639">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Project for a Comprehensive Collation of the Two Manuscripts (Hengwrt and Ellesmere) and the Two Editions (Blake [1980] and Benson [1987]) of the Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes a comprehensive comparison of two manuscripts and two editions of CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262123">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Proposal for Textual Emendation of Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Boece&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The text of Bo (&quot;The Riverside Chaucer&quot;) retains inadequate punctuation marks from previous editions and leaves several passages quite difficult to understand, though the edition shows a number of lexical improvements.  The article emends punctuation by considering syntax and content of the philosophical work.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271577">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Pseudo-&#039;Canterbury Tale&#039;: Chaucer in the Seventeenth Century]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comments on Chaucer&#039;s reputation as a Wycliffite reformer or Lollard that resulted from his depictions of clergymen (especially the Parson) and from apocryphal tales attributed to him. Edits and assesses a 1641 pamphlet that includes two poetic texts: 1) a tale of a &quot;Potent Peer of Calidon&quot; attributed to Chaucer and 2) the &quot;Scots Pedlar&quot; that is analogous to the &quot;Pardoner&#039;s Confession.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270352">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Psychoanalytic Introduction to Reader Response to Racial Literature]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Includes discussion of Chaucer&#039;s PrT as well as Aeschylus&#039;s &quot;Suppliants&quot; and works by Phillis Wheatley, Richard Wright, and James Baldwin.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261952">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Pun in &#039;The Franklin&#039;s Tale&#039; 942: &#039;Withouten coppe he drank al his penaunce&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The word coppe may derive from L. &quot;culpa,&quot; &quot;guilt,&quot; rather than from &quot;cuppa,&quot; &quot;cup.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273641">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Question of Order in the &quot;Canterbury Tales.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Challenges arguments which assert that the MLE should be followed by ShT in the order of the CT, and argues that, in &quot;light of both external and internal evidence,&quot; the Ellesmere order is the best order, with WBPT after MLT, and an emended version of MLE included between them. This arrangement, Cox suggests, best accommodates available manuscript evidence and scribal practice, Chaucer&#039;s reassignment of the ShT from Wife of Bath to Shipman, thematic interaction between MLT and WBPT, and the drama of the CT, especially considering the characterization of the Wife of Bath.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268869">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Question of Time? Question Types and Speech Act Shifts from a Historical-Contrastive Perspective: Some Examples from Old Spanish and Middle English]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Combines historical pragmatics and translation studies, using them to clarify issues fundamental to both. Examines translations of questions in &quot;Cantar de mio Cid&quot; and translations of lines from WBP (ll.1-3 and 149-51), assessing in the latter case how Modern English and Modern German translations change the illocution of the lines.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263036">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Re-Examination of Octovyen&#039;s Hunt in &#039;The Book of the Duchess&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses the meaning of some important words used in the hunting scene and corrects Emerson&#039;s interpretation in some points.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270322">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Re-examination of Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Rawlinson C.86]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Using evidence of paleography, orthography, watermarks, and indications of provenance, dates booklet 1 of Oxford, Bodleian Library MS Rawlinson C.86, as the second quarter of the fifteenth century; dates booklets 2-4 as early sixteenth century.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270432">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Reader&#039;s Guide to Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Descriptive survey of major developments in Chaucer criticism and scholarship, treated historically and sub-divided into eight categories:  1) canon, 2) texts, 3) language and versification, 4) biography, 5) learning, 6) sources, 7) fourteenth-century life and culture, and 8) interpretative criticism.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274490">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Reader&#039;s Guide to Geoffrey Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Introduces Chaucer&#039;s life and works to &quot;those who are new readers&quot; of the poet, evoking a sense of late-medieval life, especially London, Chaucer&#039;s court life, and international contexts. Explicates the tales and tellers of CT in thematic chapters, with emphasis on chivalry and courtliness, religion and philosophy (ecclesiastical offices, Lollards, pilgrimage, sexuality, Providence, fortune, and free will), science (astronomy and astrology, alchemy, physiology, and dream theory), social practice (trade, clothing, food and drink, status, manor and village life, entertainments), and literary forms. Describes more briefly similar concerns in BD, HF, PF, LGWP, and TC, closing with a brief glossary of Middle English, a bibliography, and an index.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>