<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277255">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Mulher de Bath.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Item not seen. Dramatized adaptation of Wife of Bath materials; in Portuguese. Produced by Amir Haddad in 2018.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268397">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Multivariate Analysis of English Poems: Examples of Blake and Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Using Hayashi&#039;s Quantification Method Type III (a multivariate analysis), Matsuo describes distinctive features of several linguistic structures and clarifies clusters of similarities and dissimilarities. Cites examples from poetry by Chaucer and Blake.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In Japanese.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276314">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Muse&#039;s-Eye View of Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comments on the vocabulary of NPT and on Chaucer&#039;s &quot;virtuosity&quot; in exploiting Anglo-Saxon, French, and Latinate variety to create tone and effective characterization.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276253">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Neglected Witness to Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Boece&quot; in a Medieval Devotional Commentary on &quot;The Consolation of Philosophy.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reinforces Mark Liddell&#039;s argument (&quot;The Academy,&quot; March, 1896, n.p.) that &quot;The Boke of Coumfort&quot; (MS Bodley Auct F.33.5) depended upon Chaucer&#039;s translation of Boethius in Bo, showing that it adds material from the Latin commentary tradition. Further demonstrates that in several respects &quot;Boke&quot; also &quot;gives to&quot; Bo a distinctly &quot;devotional character.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271583">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Neo-Canterbury Tales: The Hog Drover&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[An imitation of Chaucer in rhyme royal stanzas and faux Middle English; includes a prologue. Adapts the tale of Ulysses and Circe.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266256">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Neo-Revisionist Look at Chaucer&#039;s Nuns]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Based on medieval religious rules and regulations, particularly those related to orders of nuns, the medieval norm of nuns is revealed in Chaucer&#039;s depiction of the Prioress, a depiction that is not negative.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272549">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Analogue of the &#039;Shipman&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Identifies a version of the &quot;Lover&#039;s Gift Regained&quot; plot in a modern oral narrative recorded in South Carolina; comments on particular parallels with ShT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266662">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Approach to Chaucer&#039;s Spelling]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s spelling habits are still uncertain.  Reasons for disagreement among scholars lie in approaches to the problem.  Analysis of the spelling &quot;ayein&quot;/&quot;ayeyn&quot; in Hengwrt and Ellesmere and related manuscripts suggests that studies based on the spelling system of a single text across its entire manuscript tradition will allow for the construction of complete linguistic profiles of single scribes.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276896">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Approach to the Manuscripts and Editions of &quot;The Canterbury Tales&quot;: With Special Reference to Thynne&#039;s Edition.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Analyzes examples of computer-assisted textual comparison amongst nine versions of CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267584">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Approach to the Witnesses and Text of the Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Summarizes the aims and methods of the Canterbury Tales Project, describes recent improvements in the analytic programs affiliated with the Project&#039;s data (SplitsTree rather than PAUP), and suggests ways the data may help to clarify manuscript dating, meter, and spelling.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273715">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Chaucer Analogue: The Legend of Ugolino.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Presents a late-fifteenth-century analogue to Chaucer&#039;s account of Ugolino, titling it &quot;The Legend of Ugolino,&quot; found in MS. 6 of the Corning Museum of Glass, Corning, New York. Comments on the relation of the &quot;Legend&quot; to Chaucer&#039;s version, particularly is techniques of expansion (from Chaucer&#039;s 56 lines to 266) and describes the language, style, and manuscript context of the poem, printed here for the first time.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273270">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Chaucer Manuscript.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Provides a full description of the Coventry manuscript (City Record Office, Coventry) that includes six of Chaucer&#039;s Short Poems (ABC, Buk, Gent, Purse, Sted, Truth), along with works by Hoccleve, Lydgate, Mandeville, and others). Edits the text of the Chaucerian works, collates each with its other witnesses, explores their affiliations, and comments on their textual value.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276068">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Companion to Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Revised edition of A Companion to Chaucer (2000) with thirty-six new and revised chapters: Candace Barrington and Jonathan Hsy, &quot;Afterlives&quot;; Andrew Galloway, &quot;Auctorite&quot;; Jane Griffiths, &quot;Biography; Linda Ehrsam Voight, &quot;Bodies&quot;; Alfred Thomas, &quot;Bohemia&quot;; Derek Brewer and Barry Windeatt, &quot;Chivalry&quot;; Laura Kendrick, &quot;Comedy&quot;; Sarah McNamer, &quot;Emotion&quot;; Kathy Lavezzo, &quot;Ethnicity&quot;; Michael Hanrahan, &quot;Flemings&quot;; Michael Hanly, &quot;France&quot;; Caroline D. Eckhardt, &quot;Genre&quot;; Stephen H. Rigby, &quot;Ideology&quot;; David Wallace, &quot;Italy&quot;; David Burnley and Graham Williams, &quot;Language&quot;; Peter Guy Brown, &quot;London&quot;; Helen Phillips, &quot;Love&quot;; Robert R. Edwards, &quot;Narrative&quot;; Susanna Fein, &quot;Other Thought-Worlds&quot;; John M. Fyler, &quot;Pagan Survivals&quot;; Jenni Nuttall, &quot;Patronage&quot;; Lynn Staley, &quot;Personal Identity&quot;; Sebastian Sobecki, &quot;Pilgrimage and Travel&quot;; Nicholas Watson, &quot;Religion&quot;; James Simpson, &quot;Richard II&quot;; Irma Taavitsainen, &quot;Science&quot;; Marion Turner, &quot;The Senses&quot;; Masha Roskolnikov, &quot;Sexualities&quot;; Ryan Perry, &quot;Sin&quot;; Robert Swanson, &quot;Social Structures&quot;; John F. Plummer, &quot;&quot;Style&quot;; Tim William Machan, &quot;Texts&quot;; Michael Van Dussen, &quot;Things&quot;; Roger Ellis, &quot;Translation&quot;; Sarah Stanbury, &quot;Visualizing&quot;; and Nicky Hallet, &quot;Women.&quot; Like its predecessor, the volume includes discussions of key issues applied to passages from Chaucer&#039;s works, suggestions for further reading, and an index.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276836">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Companion to Critical Thinking on Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Collects twenty essays about thematic terms and concepts in Chaucer&#039;s works, arranged in groups of four, each group including an additional response essay. Opens with a foreword by Christopher Cannon, followed by an explanatory introduction by the editors, with four appendices (Summaries of Chaucer&#039;s Works, Additional Terms, Coverage by Term, and Coverage by Work) and a comprehensive index. Part 1: &quot;Consent/Assent&quot; by Fiona Somerset; &quot;Entente&quot; by Candace Barrington; &quot;Pite&quot; by Glenn D. Burger; &quot;Slider&quot; by David Raybin; Response by Ardis Butterfield. Part 2: &quot;Merveille&quot; by Tara Williams; &quot;Virginite&quot; by Sarah Salih; &quot;Swiven&quot; by Helen Barr; &quot;Craft&quot; by Bruce Holsinger; Response by Simon Horobin. Part 3: &quot;Vertuby Holly A. Crocker; &quot;Wal&quot; by Marion Turner; &quot;Thing&quot; by Steele Nowlin; &quot;Blak&quot; by Cord J. Whitaker; Response by Carolyn Dinshaw. Part 4: &quot;Auctorite / Auctour&quot; by R. D. Perry; &quot;Seculere&quot; by Catherine Sanok; &quot;Flesh&quot; by Richard H. Godden;<br />
&quot;Memorie&quot; by Ruth Evans; Response by Andrew Cole.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268262">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Concordance to The Canterbury Tales Based on Blake&#039;s Text Edited from the Hengwrt Manuscript]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A comprehensive concordance to CT based on Blake&#039;s text from the Hengwrt manuscript. Includes an alphabetical and frequency word list; describes spellings, words, syntax, and metrics.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276210">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Conjecture for &quot;Book of the Duchess&quot; 1315.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses previous scholarship on line 1315 of BD, and suggests that emending the line to &quot;Gan [hym] homwarde for to ryde&quot; brings it into conformance with the rest of this &quot;briskly tetrametric poem.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265164">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Descriptive Catalogue of the Manuscripts of the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Proposes a complete descriptive catalog of the manuscripts of CT to be published in electronic form as part of the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039; Project, illustrating features of each manuscript through electronic facsimiles. ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The work will supercede Manly and Rickert&#039;s vol. 1 (Chicago, 1940) by taking advantage of recent advances in paleography and codicology, thus providing for each manuscript a codicological description; dating,  provenance, and history;textual affiliations; incipits and explicits; an updatable bibliography; and linguistic profiles of the scribes.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269347">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Fragment of the Romaunt of the Rose]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Horobin describes and transcribes a single-leaf, forty-eight line fragment of Rom (lines 2403-50), newly found among the Reverend Joass portion of the Sutherland collection of the National Library of Scotland. Also considers relationships among this fragment and the other early witnesses to Rom, i.e., Glasgow University Library Hunter 409 (V.3.7) and William Thynne&#039;s edition of 1532.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275455">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New History of English Metre.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Uses comparative and linguistic metrics and statistical analysis to describe the history of English meter from early Germanic verse to modern metrical experiments. Chapter 4, &quot;Versifying in Bilingual England&quot; (pp. 73-95), focuses on the metrical practices and innovations of Gower and Chaucer, concentrating on Chaucer&#039;s early &quot;short-line&quot; verse as a &quot;four-ictic dolnik with a transitionally iambic rhythm&quot; and explaining his &quot;great innovation&quot;--the &quot;first true iambic pentameter in any European language,&quot; made flexible, effective, and non-monotonous by Chaucer&#039;s techniques of evasion, inversion, void, and caesural variation. Identifies Chaucer&#039;s metrical influences and provides examples throughout. Includes comments on the French dialect and metrics of the so-called &quot;Poems of Ch.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266777">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Introduction to Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A &quot;radical revision&quot; (xi) of Brewer&#039;s 1984 &quot;Introduction to Chaucer&quot; (SAC 8 [1986], no. 55a); like its predecessor, a general introduction intended for specialists and first-time readers of Chaucer alike. Carried over from the first edition, the biographical and social history is retained largely intact.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The expanded discussions of Chaucer&#039;s works are marked by Brewer&#039;s interests in social anthropology and his belief in what is &quot;common to human nature.&quot; Brewer views Chaucer as a great artist and a sensitive and humane person.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267570">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Invitation to Chaucer&#039;s General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[An edition based on the Variorum facsimile edition of the Hengwrt manuscript (1979), retaining the original virgule marks. Includes glosses and explanatory notes at the bottom of the page, with Japanese translation, textual notes, and commentary.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274517">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Look at &quot;The Complaint of Chaucer to His Purse.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes the involvement of Thomas Chaucer and Thomas Swynford in matters related to the deposition and death of Richard II, suggesting that they help to account for the tone and perspective in Purse (especially the Envoy) and Henry&#039;s swift and positive response to Chaucer&#039;s request in the poem.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261367">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Look at an Old Patient: Chaucer&#039;s Summoner and Medieval Physiognmia]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses Chaucer&#039;s characterization of the Summoner in GP and asserts that, despite modern assumptions, it is based on the confluence of medical and astrological theories prevalent during Chaucer&#039;s time.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268912">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Look at Chaucer and the Rhetoricians]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[First published in 1964, the essay is reprinted here with original pagination, along with a number of other essays by Murphy. Murphy argues that Chaucer was not likely to have been directly influenced by rhetoricians such as Geoffrey of Vinsauf.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274458">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Look at Chaucer and the Rhetoricians.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys the &quot;status of rhetoric in England&quot; during Chaucer&#039;s lifetime, documenting the &quot;ubiquity of grammatical texts and the paucity of rhetorical texts.&quot; Tabulates Chaucer&#039;s uses of the terminology of rhetoric and style, analyzes his usage of these terms (characterizing it as &quot;loose&quot;), and explores Chaucer&#039;s allusions to Cicero, Petrarch, and Geoffrey of Vinsauf, arguing that they are conventional or written in imitation of French models, with purported echoes of Vinsauf likely derived from Nicholas Trevet&#039;s &quot;Annales.&quot; Concludes that &quot;Chaucer&#039;s use of certain &#039;rhetorical&#039; terms merely indicates a generalized knowledge of rhetoric rather than a technical acquaintance with it.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
