<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276023">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Midsummer Night&#039;s Dream.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The introduction and notes include commentary on Shakespeare&#039;s debts to Chaucer in &quot;A Midsummer Night&#039;s Dream,&quot; focusing on the characterization of Theseus, the &quot;rite of maying&quot;&quot; and elements of the fairy world. Discusses KnT most extensively, but also mentions LGW, Th, MerT, and WBT, with<br />
all references indexed.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273218">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Minor Analogue to the Branding in &#039;The Miller&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that the &quot;fabliau of the &#039;Sot chevalier&#039; by Gautier le Leu&quot; is a source for the branding scene of MilT and for the summary of action at the end of the Tale.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270333">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Mirror for Arthur Gorges: Spenser&#039;s &#039;Daphnaida&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comparative analysis evinces how Spenser adapts Chaucer&#039;s BD in creating his &quot;Daphnaida.&quot; The impact changes, however, as Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Man in Black presents Gaunt with an idealized version of himself,&quot; while Spenser&#039;s poem presents his friend, Arthur Gorges, &quot;with a quiet warning.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274338">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Mirror of Chaucer&#039;s World.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reproduces b&amp;w photographs of medieval manuscript pages and details, maps, sites, and objects, using them to illustrate Chaucer&#039;s life, works, and social contexts, and intended to enable readers to imagine what Chaucer&#039;s audience &quot;saw with the mind&#039;s eye&quot; in response to his descriptions. Organized to illustrate Chaucer&#039;s writings, the images are accompanied by brief descriptions that identify them, connect them to Chaucer&#039;s life and works, and, where appropriate, provide references for further study.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273712">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Mode of Word-Meaning in Chaucer&#039;s Language of Love.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores the semantic operation of words drawn from the language of courtly love, following J. R. Frith&#039;s theory of linguistic context and collocation, and discussing examples from TC.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272426">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Model of the Ideal and Natural in Social Groups in &#039;Mum and the Sothsegger&#039;: A Metaphorical Analysis]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Interprets the ideological content of &quot;Mum and the Sothsegger&quot; metaphorically by viewing it as advice on king&#039;s rule and social hierarchy. Refers to thematically relevant passages from CT and TC.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266261">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Monk Ther Was, a Fair for the Maistrie]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Summarizes the history, ideals, and practice of medieval monks as background to understanding the GP sketch of the Monk and the monk of ShT.  The Monk is preoccupied with the diversion of monastic administration, while the Shipman&#039;s Daun John is more sinister.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274229">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Moral Garden &quot;out of olde feldes&quot;: Deallegorized Virtue in Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Parliament of Fowls.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that when read in the light of the moralized garden in Alan of Lille&#039;s &quot;Plaint of Nature,&quot; the &quot;locus amoenus&quot; of PF is &quot;an ethically charged terrain,&quot; in which the narrator successively exemplifies and then deviates from the virtues of prudence, temperance, fortitude, and justice. Thus, PF presents a &quot;dynamic portrait of moral agency.&quot; ]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277255">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Mulher de Bath.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Item not seen. Dramatized adaptation of Wife of Bath materials; in Portuguese. Produced by Amir Haddad in 2018.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268397">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Multivariate Analysis of English Poems: Examples of Blake and Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Using Hayashi&#039;s Quantification Method Type III (a multivariate analysis), Matsuo describes distinctive features of several linguistic structures and clarifies clusters of similarities and dissimilarities. Cites examples from poetry by Chaucer and Blake.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In Japanese.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276314">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Muse&#039;s-Eye View of Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comments on the vocabulary of NPT and on Chaucer&#039;s &quot;virtuosity&quot; in exploiting Anglo-Saxon, French, and Latinate variety to create tone and effective characterization.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276253">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Neglected Witness to Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Boece&quot; in a Medieval Devotional Commentary on &quot;The Consolation of Philosophy.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reinforces Mark Liddell&#039;s argument (&quot;The Academy,&quot; March, 1896, n.p.) that &quot;The Boke of Coumfort&quot; (MS Bodley Auct F.33.5) depended upon Chaucer&#039;s translation of Boethius in Bo, showing that it adds material from the Latin commentary tradition. Further demonstrates that in several respects &quot;Boke&quot; also &quot;gives to&quot; Bo a distinctly &quot;devotional character.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271583">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Neo-Canterbury Tales: The Hog Drover&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[An imitation of Chaucer in rhyme royal stanzas and faux Middle English; includes a prologue. Adapts the tale of Ulysses and Circe.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266256">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Neo-Revisionist Look at Chaucer&#039;s Nuns]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Based on medieval religious rules and regulations, particularly those related to orders of nuns, the medieval norm of nuns is revealed in Chaucer&#039;s depiction of the Prioress, a depiction that is not negative.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272549">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Analogue of the &#039;Shipman&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Identifies a version of the &quot;Lover&#039;s Gift Regained&quot; plot in a modern oral narrative recorded in South Carolina; comments on particular parallels with ShT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266662">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Approach to Chaucer&#039;s Spelling]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s spelling habits are still uncertain.  Reasons for disagreement among scholars lie in approaches to the problem.  Analysis of the spelling &quot;ayein&quot;/&quot;ayeyn&quot; in Hengwrt and Ellesmere and related manuscripts suggests that studies based on the spelling system of a single text across its entire manuscript tradition will allow for the construction of complete linguistic profiles of single scribes.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276896">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Approach to the Manuscripts and Editions of &quot;The Canterbury Tales&quot;: With Special Reference to Thynne&#039;s Edition.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Analyzes examples of computer-assisted textual comparison amongst nine versions of CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267584">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Approach to the Witnesses and Text of the Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Summarizes the aims and methods of the Canterbury Tales Project, describes recent improvements in the analytic programs affiliated with the Project&#039;s data (SplitsTree rather than PAUP), and suggests ways the data may help to clarify manuscript dating, meter, and spelling.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273715">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Chaucer Analogue: The Legend of Ugolino.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Presents a late-fifteenth-century analogue to Chaucer&#039;s account of Ugolino, titling it &quot;The Legend of Ugolino,&quot; found in MS. 6 of the Corning Museum of Glass, Corning, New York. Comments on the relation of the &quot;Legend&quot; to Chaucer&#039;s version, particularly is techniques of expansion (from Chaucer&#039;s 56 lines to 266) and describes the language, style, and manuscript context of the poem, printed here for the first time.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273270">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Chaucer Manuscript.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Provides a full description of the Coventry manuscript (City Record Office, Coventry) that includes six of Chaucer&#039;s Short Poems (ABC, Buk, Gent, Purse, Sted, Truth), along with works by Hoccleve, Lydgate, Mandeville, and others). Edits the text of the Chaucerian works, collates each with its other witnesses, explores their affiliations, and comments on their textual value.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276068">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Companion to Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Revised edition of A Companion to Chaucer (2000) with thirty-six new and revised chapters: Candace Barrington and Jonathan Hsy, &quot;Afterlives&quot;; Andrew Galloway, &quot;Auctorite&quot;; Jane Griffiths, &quot;Biography; Linda Ehrsam Voight, &quot;Bodies&quot;; Alfred Thomas, &quot;Bohemia&quot;; Derek Brewer and Barry Windeatt, &quot;Chivalry&quot;; Laura Kendrick, &quot;Comedy&quot;; Sarah McNamer, &quot;Emotion&quot;; Kathy Lavezzo, &quot;Ethnicity&quot;; Michael Hanrahan, &quot;Flemings&quot;; Michael Hanly, &quot;France&quot;; Caroline D. Eckhardt, &quot;Genre&quot;; Stephen H. Rigby, &quot;Ideology&quot;; David Wallace, &quot;Italy&quot;; David Burnley and Graham Williams, &quot;Language&quot;; Peter Guy Brown, &quot;London&quot;; Helen Phillips, &quot;Love&quot;; Robert R. Edwards, &quot;Narrative&quot;; Susanna Fein, &quot;Other Thought-Worlds&quot;; John M. Fyler, &quot;Pagan Survivals&quot;; Jenni Nuttall, &quot;Patronage&quot;; Lynn Staley, &quot;Personal Identity&quot;; Sebastian Sobecki, &quot;Pilgrimage and Travel&quot;; Nicholas Watson, &quot;Religion&quot;; James Simpson, &quot;Richard II&quot;; Irma Taavitsainen, &quot;Science&quot;; Marion Turner, &quot;The Senses&quot;; Masha Roskolnikov, &quot;Sexualities&quot;; Ryan Perry, &quot;Sin&quot;; Robert Swanson, &quot;Social Structures&quot;; John F. Plummer, &quot;&quot;Style&quot;; Tim William Machan, &quot;Texts&quot;; Michael Van Dussen, &quot;Things&quot;; Roger Ellis, &quot;Translation&quot;; Sarah Stanbury, &quot;Visualizing&quot;; and Nicky Hallet, &quot;Women.&quot; Like its predecessor, the volume includes discussions of key issues applied to passages from Chaucer&#039;s works, suggestions for further reading, and an index.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276836">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Companion to Critical Thinking on Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Collects twenty essays about thematic terms and concepts in Chaucer&#039;s works, arranged in groups of four, each group including an additional response essay. Opens with a foreword by Christopher Cannon, followed by an explanatory introduction by the editors, with four appendices (Summaries of Chaucer&#039;s Works, Additional Terms, Coverage by Term, and Coverage by Work) and a comprehensive index. Part 1: &quot;Consent/Assent&quot; by Fiona Somerset; &quot;Entente&quot; by Candace Barrington; &quot;Pite&quot; by Glenn D. Burger; &quot;Slider&quot; by David Raybin; Response by Ardis Butterfield. Part 2: &quot;Merveille&quot; by Tara Williams; &quot;Virginite&quot; by Sarah Salih; &quot;Swiven&quot; by Helen Barr; &quot;Craft&quot; by Bruce Holsinger; Response by Simon Horobin. Part 3: &quot;Vertuby Holly A. Crocker; &quot;Wal&quot; by Marion Turner; &quot;Thing&quot; by Steele Nowlin; &quot;Blak&quot; by Cord J. Whitaker; Response by Carolyn Dinshaw. Part 4: &quot;Auctorite / Auctour&quot; by R. D. Perry; &quot;Seculere&quot; by Catherine Sanok; &quot;Flesh&quot; by Richard H. Godden;<br />
&quot;Memorie&quot; by Ruth Evans; Response by Andrew Cole.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268262">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Concordance to The Canterbury Tales Based on Blake&#039;s Text Edited from the Hengwrt Manuscript]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A comprehensive concordance to CT based on Blake&#039;s text from the Hengwrt manuscript. Includes an alphabetical and frequency word list; describes spellings, words, syntax, and metrics.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276210">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Conjecture for &quot;Book of the Duchess&quot; 1315.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses previous scholarship on line 1315 of BD, and suggests that emending the line to &quot;Gan [hym] homwarde for to ryde&quot; brings it into conformance with the rest of this &quot;briskly tetrametric poem.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265164">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Descriptive Catalogue of the Manuscripts of the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Proposes a complete descriptive catalog of the manuscripts of CT to be published in electronic form as part of the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039; Project, illustrating features of each manuscript through electronic facsimiles. ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The work will supercede Manly and Rickert&#039;s vol. 1 (Chicago, 1940) by taking advantage of recent advances in paleography and codicology, thus providing for each manuscript a codicological description; dating,  provenance, and history;textual affiliations; incipits and explicits; an updatable bibliography; and linguistic profiles of the scribes.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
