<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262660">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Dictionary of Classical Reference in English Poetry]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Indexes classical references in Chaucer, work by work (pp. 268-74).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272268">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Dictionary of Classical, Mythological, and Sideral Names in the Works of Geoffrey Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Provides historical and literary background to names used and mentioned in Chaucer&#039;s works, identifying their Arabic, Greek, and/or Latin equivalents, exploring the relations of the names to their contexts in Chaucer&#039;s works, and commenting on linguistic aspects of the names.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272780">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Dictionary of Literature in the English Language: From Chaucer to 1940]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The entry for Chaucer (pp. 168) includes brief biographical information, critical bibliography, a list of editions, and a tally of individual works with dates of first publication. Accompanied by a b&amp;w plate from Thynne&#039;s 1532 edition, the first page of ClT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272115">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Dictionary of Personal, Mythological, Allegorical, and Astrological Proper Names and Allusions in the Works of Geoffrey Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Alphabetically arranged, cross-listed dictionary of proper names in Chaucer&#039;s works.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271053">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Digital Approach to the History of the Book: The Case of Caxton]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Suggests several revisions to traditional classifications of the typefaces of William Caxton, drawing evidence, in part, from the digital reproductions of British Museum copies of Caxton&#039;s two editions of CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270641">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Digital Catalogue of the Pre-1500 Manuscripts and Incunables of the &quot;Canterbury Tales&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comprehensive description of the eighty-four manuscript witnesses to CT and four pre-1500 editions, each including contents, tale order, progress of copying, materials, page size, collation, format, hands, illumination, binding, date, language, provenance, and bibliography. Descriptions include links, internal and external, to supporting data. The disk contains an essay on each of the following scribes: B, D, Hammond, Petworth, Beryn, and Hooked-g (i.e., scribe of the Devonshire group).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269392">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Diplomatic Edition of Chaucer&#039;s Parson&#039;s Tale (Bodleian MS Arch. Selden B.14, fol. 269r, l.104-fol. 275v, l. 290): A Supplement to Furnivall&#039;s A Six-Text Print of Chaucer&#039;s Canterbury Tales (Series 1, No. 49) in the Chaucer Society]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Furnivall&#039;s Six-Text Print transcribes ParsT from Selden B.17, except for lines 104-290, which come from Lansdowne 851. The lines from Seldan are given here.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270507">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Discussion of Chaucer&#039;s &#039;The Prioress&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comments on the anti-Semitism of PrT and suggests that it does not lessen the beauty of the tale.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261662">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Discussion of the Archetype of the Supernatural Husband and the Supernatural Wife As It Appears in Some of Geoffrey Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considers Chaucer&#039;s tales of marriage in light of patterns of the supernatural marriages in folktales, identifying MLT and SNT as tales that transcend marital opposition through allegory, and viewing ClT, MerT, FranT, and SqT as tales in which the &quot;strangeness&quot; of the marital relation is realistically left &quot;unmediated.&quot;  WBT is most like folktales of supernatural marriage, harmonizing the marital conflict in a pervasive &quot;all-connectedness.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271803">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Distinction of Poetic Form: What Happened to Rhyme Royal in Scotland?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Employs both stylistic and codicological analysis to consider Chaucer&#039;s inheritance of the French rhyme royal stanza form and his use of it in TC. Demonstrates how rhyme royal flourished in Scotland, initially in &quot;The Kingis Quair,&quot; and later in the compositions of Robert Henryson.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264358">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Distinction of Stories: The Medieval Unity of Chaucer&#039;s Fair Chain of Narratives for Canterbury]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Medieval literary theory in general, and commentary on Ovid&#039;s &quot;Metamorphoses,&quot; the tales-in-a-frame book most certainly important to Chaucer, suggest that CT can best be understood when grouped in four kinds:  natural, magical, moral, and spiritual.  ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[When Chaucer&#039;s established fragments are reordered, under the guidance of this medieval precedent, as I, VIII, V, III, VI,II, IV, IX, VII, X, a structure emerges of four groups of tales.  In each group--KnT to CkT, SNT to PardT, MLT to ShT,PrT to ParsT--the tales come in a logically descending order. ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Although marriage is in some sense paradigmatic for the whole collection, the third, moral, group is a newly proposed marriage group.  The tales are put into a fresh order that stimulates new ideas.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273048">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Double Sorrow: &quot;Troilus and Criseyde&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reconstructs the narrative progress of TC in a sequence of some 200 seven-line poems, approximating rhyme royal, keyed by line numbers to Chaucer&#039;s work, and arranged in five books; running footers link the verse with the plot. Individual poems give voice to the major characters or describe their attitudes, highlighting thematic concerns in Chaucer&#039;s work and interpreting the characters&#039; thoughts and feelings  and the conditions of their love. The Introduction comments on Chaucer&#039;s art and his use of Boccaccio.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272251">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Draft for the Analysis of Verbal Periphrases in the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Analyzes a sample of periphrastic verbal phrases drawn from GP, describing practices and problems in pursuing computer analysis of Middle English. Focuses on frequency of verbal periphrases, uses of auxiliaries, ordering of elements, and grammatical functions.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277687">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Euphemistic Allusion to the &quot;Reeve&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Identifies several previously unnoticed references and allusions to Chaucer in Nathaniel Whiting&#039;s &quot;I1 Insonio Insonadado&quot; (1638), including two euphemisms for the sexual revenge in RvT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263362">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Fabliau in the &#039;Prologue to the Tale of Beryn&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Parallels in diction, phrasing, portrayal, and plot suggest that the episode of the Pardoner and the tapster is shaped according to the model of the Chaucerian fabliau.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273595">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Fallen Language and the Consolation of Art in the &quot;Book of the Duchess.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Links BD with Freudian method, arguing that the poem &quot;foreshadows&quot; psychoanalysis through its depiction of how certain uses of language can heal trauma from painful memories]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267222">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A False Imprint in Chaucer&#039;s Workes: Protestant Printers in London (and Zurich?)]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Analyzes a flyleaf from a ca.1548 printing by Robert Toye of William Thynne&#039;s edition of Chaucer&#039;s Workes as evidence that Toye was part of a group of &quot;active radical Protestant&quot; printers. The flyleaf includes Ulrich Zwingli&#039;s The Rekenynge and Declaracion of the Fayth, and the imprint carefully incorporates The Plowman&#039;s Tale. This essay includes information about Dutch printers working in mid-sixteenth-century England.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268449">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Farewell to Arms? Criticism of Warfare in Late Fourteenth-Century England]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Criticism of warfare at the end of the fourteenth century focused on greed and pride as &quot;evils of the times,&quot; rather than on burdens of taxation, an earlier preoccupation. In Sted, Form Age, Mel, and Th, Chaucer&#039;s dislike of war is evident, and his concerns are similar to those of his contemporaries--John Gower, Sir John Clanvowe, and others--perhaps as a result of the way warfare was financed.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269123">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Feel for the Game: Bourdieu, Source Study, and the Legend]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Uses game theory and Pierre Bourdieu&#039;s theory of &quot;radical contextualization&quot; to encourage more deeply engaged source-in-context analysis of LGW.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265991">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Female I-deal: Chaucer&#039;s Second Nun]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[SNT reflects a Marian-driven ideal of virginal power, mayde and martyr,&quot; while SNP stresses Mary as mediatrix, &quot;Mayde and Mooder.&quot;  The absent female-gendered body of the Second Nun, undescribed in GP, bears witness to the bodies of female spiritual heroines.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266069">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Fifteenth-Century Confession Sermon on &#039;Unkyndensess&#039; (CUL MS Gg 6.26) and Its Literary Parallels and Parodies]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Observes parallels between a confessional sermon and the following:  the Wit section of &quot;Piers Plowman,&quot; the &quot;Somme le Roi,&quot; &quot;Mankind,&quot; and both SumT and PardT.   Includesa text of the Middle English sermon.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273295">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Flock of Words: An Anthology of Poetry for Children and Others.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Includes selections from GP (pp. 16-33) in Middle English with Nevill Coghill&#039;s modern translation on facing pages and brief comments and notes (pp. 296-97).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271909">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Fourteenth-Century Ecology: &#039;The Former Age&#039; with Dindimus]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Form Age shares thematic elements with Alexander legends, including vegetarianism and prohibitions against agriculture. In these poems humans live as, and eat as, animals do, a contrast to the mastery described in Genesis. The life described in these poems, one of &quot;moral sensitivity without limits,&quot; would be not utopian, but wretched.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268488">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Franciscan Reads the &#039;Facetus&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Olson examines Gerard of Odo&#039;s &quot;Facetus, multa documenta,&quot; a commentary on Aristotle&#039;s &quot;Nichomachean Ethics,&quot; as background to the Prioress&#039;s description in GP. The Franciscan commentary may indicate that the courtliness of the description is more than just satire.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266242">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Frankeleyn Was in His Compaignye]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The ambiguous social and legal status of franklins in fourteenth-century England makes it difficult to know whether Chaucer&#039;s Franklin was a member of the gentry or an aspirant to the gentle class.  Sembler surveys critical opinions about the Franklin&#039;s gentility.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>