<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268270">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manciple&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Read by Philip Thiel; edited by Troy Sales and Paul Thomas. Recorded by Ewart Shaw at Radio Adelaide. Includes ManPT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268364">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manciple&#039;s Tale: Response]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comments on the five contributions to SAC 25&#039;s &quot;Colloquium: The Manciple&#039;s Tale,&quot; reading them as a &quot;snapshot of some of the ways . . . Chaucerians read today&quot; and exploring how the interruptions and reversals in ManT efface moral distinctions.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263772">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Maniciple&#039;s Diplomatic Immunity]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Manciple&#039;s skillful use of diplomacy maintains the Cook&#039;s friendship while preventing him from revealing the Manciple&#039;s shady dealings.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263886">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manipulations of Chaucer&#039;s Pandarus and Shakespeare&#039;s Iago]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Although TC is not a source for &quot;Othello,&quot; Pandarus and Iago use similar tactics to manipulate others.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265457">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manly-Rickert Text of the &quot;Canterbury Tales&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Defends the Manly-Rickert (M-R) text of CT and its apparatus against &quot;false and demeaning&quot; impressions in recent discussions and editions]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In separate chapters, Ramsey (1) critiques the methods of editors from Urry to the &quot;Chaucer Variorum;&quot; (2) explains the method and chronology of M-R; (3) surveys the practices of late-medieval scribes and book production; (4) suggests the existence of a complex variety of CT texts ca. 1400; (5) argues for the influence of these texts on post-1400 manuscripts; (6) explores the production of post-1400 manuscripts; and (7) examines the production of Hengwrt and its value.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Using M-R data throughout his discussion, Ramsey concludes that M-R must be used in conjunction with the best-text manuscript (Hengwrt) to produce an edition that closes the gap between the &quot;Variorum&quot; and classroom texts.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265546">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manor, the Plowman, and the Shepherd: Agrarian Themes and Imagery in Late Medieval and Early Renaissance English Literature]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Traces the changing reception of the literary images of the plowman and the shepherd from the thirteenth to the sixteenth century.  In the fourteenth century, the plowman begins to shift from representing such values as hard work and thrift to appearing as a figure of discontent and shiftlessness.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[By contrast, the pastoral figure begins to gain in status and,by the sixteenth century, takes the plowman&#039;s place in literary prominence.  Chapter 3 examines the literary responses to changing agrarian conditions as seen in Gower, Chaucer, and the poetic followers of Langland.  Hill argues that Chaucer responds to agrarian themes by transforming and incorporating the learned classical tradition of Virgil&#039;s &quot;Georgics&quot; in CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275042">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manuscript as an Ambigraphic Medium: Hoccleve&#039;s Scribes, Illuminators, and Their Problems.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that medieval &quot;media consciousness,&quot; despite the lack of &quot;verbal declarations of such awareness,&quot; is evident in the text-image relations of the Chaucer portrait in manuscripts of Thomas Hoccleve&#039;s &quot;Regiment of Princes,&quot; coining the term &quot;ambigraphic&quot; to characterize the &quot;ontological complexity&quot; of Hoccleve&#039;s &quot;self-referential&quot; text and the features of its presentation that are simultaneously original and copied.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269402">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manuscript Glosses of the Canterbury Tales and the University of London&#039;s Copy of Pynson&#039;s [1492] Edition: Witness to a Lost Exemplar]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Scribal glosses in a copy of this third incunabular edition of CT (STC 5084) provide further evidence of manuscript W, a hypothesized manuscript affiliated with Trinity College, Cambridge, MS R.3.15, and Wynkyn de Worde&#039;s edition of CT. They also evince the intermingling of scribal and print modes of production at the close of the fifteenth century.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262060">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manuscript Glosses to Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Troilus and Criseyde&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A list of every marginal notation in every manuscript of TC.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270110">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manuscript Titles of Truth : Titology and the Medieval Gap]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Modern notions and theory of literary titles (&quot;titology&quot;) cannot be applied readily to medieval works. Gibbons comments on the titles of several of Chaucer&#039;s poems as an aspect of the &quot;ordinatio&quot; of their manuscripts. Medieval titles, especially those of brief works, are &quot;structural signs&quot; indicating where individual works begin and end.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268894">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manuscripts and Textual Tradition of The Canterbury Tales Again]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues for new attention to the complexities of textual issues in critical discussions of CT, suggesting that many recent studies ignore or only gesture toward such complexities.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261549">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manuscripts and Transmission of Chaucer&#039;s Troilus]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Though they are continuous copies, made without hesitation, surviving manuscripts of TC contain embedded features of their predecessors.  The features we infer from extant copies may belong to immediate exemplars used by the scribes of those copies or may have emerged at some earlier stage of the text.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266064">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manuscripts of Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Legend of Good Women&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys issues in the textual history of LGW, e.g., its production in booklets and evidence of readership.  Also describes codicological details of the ten surviving manuscripts that include the poem.  Does not address the two versions of LGWP.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266066">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manuscripts of Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Parlement of Fowls&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys the issues in the textual history of &quot;Parlement of Fowls,&quot; e.g., the role of Cambridge University Library MS Gg 4.27; the status of the roundel; and the influence of the poem.  Also describes codicological details of the fourteen surviving manuscripts that include the poem, except those that include &quot;Legend of Good Women.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265170">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manuscripts of Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Troilus&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys the sixteen extant manuscripts of TC, dividing them into four subgroups and commenting on their dates and relationships.  Describes each manuscript, giving information on codexes, collations, scribal hands, corrections, marginalia, decoration, and marks of ownership.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270423">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manuscripts of Chaucer&#039;s Works and Their Use]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes the editorial practices necessary to produce a modern edition of Chaucer&#039;s works, commenting on spelling, punctuation (especially virgules), meter (especially final -e), and distinguishing scribal and authorial forms. Summarizes the number of manuscripts for each of Chaucer&#039;s works (including individual tales of Canterbury), and describes the genetic method of reconstruction, recommending that editors trust their own convictions. Closes with comments on three cruces: WBP 3.117, Th (7.917), and ShT (7.43).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270360">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manuscripts of English Courtly Love Lyrics in the Fifteenth Century]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Investigates the &quot;manuscript context&quot; of courtly love lyrics, identifying their incidence and the implications of their groupings and solo occurrences. Recurrent mention of Chaucer&#039;s lyrics, and discussion of manuscripts that include &quot;clusters&quot; of poems which seem to indicate interest in &quot;connections with Chaucer.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265163">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manuscripts of the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reviews and comments on Charles Owen&#039;s &quot;The Manuscripts of &#039;The Canterbury Tales&#039;,&quot; supporting the view that there were many copies of single tales and small groups of tales in circulation.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261212">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manuscripts of the Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chronologically surveys CT manuscripts, highlighting the importance of Hengwrt and the &quot;wide difference in the number of independent textual traditions for different parts&quot; of the work.  Rejects the notion of a single Chaucerian copy text, crediting the &quot;Hengwrt editor&quot; with the first impulse to collect the Tales from fragments.  ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[  Despite continued circulation of &quot;booklets&quot; of tales, the early fifteenth century witnessed the standardization of two orders for the Tales.  Manuscripts of single tales or small groups increased steadily throughout the century, suggesting that modern notions of &quot;complete&quot; texts of CT are misguided.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270387">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Manuscripts of the Major English Poetic Texts]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes the &quot;new phase&quot; in English publishing and book production that took place in the &quot;early years&quot; of the fifteenth century--particularly the large increase in the number of books of vernacular poetry, including Chaucer&#039;s poetry. Summarizes what is known about the conditions of manuscript production at the time and what changes were underway. Tabulates summary data for manuscripts of selected texts, including TC and CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271020">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Many Faces of Evil]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chronological anthology of selections and excerpts from philosophy, religious texts, and fiction, representing the historical &quot;varieties&quot; of evil. Includes excerpts from ParsT, entitled &quot;The Seven Deadly Sins&quot; (pp. 100-05) in modern translation.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274895">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Map of the World: For High Voice and Piano.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Includes lyrics from a portion of Ros (lines 1–7, 15), translated into Modern English by Forrest Hainline.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274718">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Mapping of Rhetorical Strategies Related to Persuasion in Middle English Religious Prose.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Studies the generic variety, rhetorical features, and persuasive power of four works of medieval English literature, including ParsT, tabulating the relative incidences of rhetorical questions, appeals to authority or logic, poetic devices, vocatives, humor, personal pronouns, etc.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268343">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Mapping Structure of Metaphor: An Analysis of Chaucer&#039;s Merchant&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Structuralist analysis of how metaphors develop into themes in MerT and, in turn, &quot;steer the plot.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274885">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Margins of the Scribe: Analysis of the Marginal Annotations in the Manuscripts of Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Troilus and Criseyde.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines marginal annotations in the surviving manuscripts of TC with the purpose of exploring both the reception of the poem and the role of the scribes in its textual transmission. The marginalia are analyzed not only from a textual, thematic, linguistic, and paleographical point of view, but also from the perspective of the copyists and their preferences when reading and annotating Chaucer&#039;s text, which contributes to understanding the profiles of these scribes.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>