<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274023">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Hag Transformed: &quot;The Tale of Florent,&quot; Ethical Choice, and Female Desire in Late Medieval England.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Compares and contrasts Gower&#039;s tale of Florent with WBT and &quot;The Wedding of Sir Gawain and Dame Ragnelle,&quot; arguing that Gower and Chaucer &quot;grapple with ethical circumstances in human relationships&quot; (matters of right conduct and governance, respectively) while the &quot;Wedding&quot; exposes the &quot;fragility of courtly virtues.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265008">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Hagiographic Narrators of Geoffrey Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;: The Second Nun, the Man of Law, the Prioress]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The rhetorical and narrative conventions used by Chaucer in his saintly tales reveal him an accomplished hagiographer.  An analysis of the narrator&#039;s rhetoric in describing the characters in GP produces a better understanding of the relation between the language and characterization of the three hagiographers.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264709">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Hainault Connection: Missed Connection, Wrong Connection]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Even though the Hainault Forest in Essex derives from Old English &quot;hyneholt&quot; (&quot;monastic forest&quot;), owned by the Benedictine abbey of Barking, Chaucer&#039;s many connections with Flemish Hainault are evident even here since John of Gaunt contributed to the abbey when Chaucer&#039;s daughter (or sister?) became a nun there in 1381.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277158">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Hall of Honor: Chaucer, Hawes, and the Conclusion to Gerard Legh&#039;s &quot;Accedens of Armory.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Shows how Legh uses the dream vision structure from HF but employs a frame of memory and &quot;argues against Chaucer&#039;s position that fame is unrelated to deserving.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271141">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Hangman&#039;s Hymn: The Carpenter&#039;s Tale of Mystery and Murder as He Goes on Pilgrimage from London to Canterbury]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Historical gothic detective fiction set in the frame of the CT, in which a carpenter tells a story to the rest of the pilgrims about the solving of mysterious murders.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271695">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Harmony of Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Parlement&#039; A Dissonant Voice]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that PF &quot;exemplifies and confronts&quot; late fourteenth-century concern with the role of subjective perspective in considering traditional authority. Through various stylized, &quot;thought-marked&quot; perspectives, the poem presents the &quot;disruptive force&quot; of individual experience and the need for &quot;self-limitation&quot;; as a proto-retraction, the roundel presages the endings of TC and CT by reauthorizing authority.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272741">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Harmony of Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Parliament&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that critical efforts to provide a harmonious interpretation of PF are misdirected because the poem is designed to represent the cacophony of this world rather than heavenly concord.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276455">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Haunting of Geoffrey Chaucer: Dante, Boccaccio and the Ghostly Poetics of the &quot;Trecento.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Demonstrates &quot;intertexuality&quot; linking Chaucer with Dante&#039;s &quot;Inferno,&quot; 10, and Boccaccio&#039;s &quot;Decameron,&quot; 6.9. Argues for Chaucer&#039;s rich understanding of his Italian source material, which he uses &quot;purposefully and playfully.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275936">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Hazard of Narration: Frame-Tale Technologies and the &quot;Oriental Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses the framed narratives and their progression throughout the Mediterranean, emphasizing framed tales, especially in Italian, that &quot;present narration as a high-stakes wager that may save a population in peril.&quot; By examining this Italian tradition in relation to Chaucer&#039;s works, shows that this &quot;narrative environment . . . provides a context in which his own literary decisions may be better understood and appreciated.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271635">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Heart and the Chain]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines &quot;heart&quot; (in its several meanings) as the nucleus of BD, and &quot;prison&quot;/&quot;chain&quot; as one in KnT, treating each as a structuring device and a wellspring of the themes and imagery in its respective narrative. Similar nuclei function comically in MilT (holes) and PF (place). In TC &quot;heart&quot; and &quot;bond&quot; are paired nuclei, i.e., organizing metaphors for love and order.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263816">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Heart in &#039;Troilus and Criseyde&#039;: The Eye of the Beast, the Mirror of the Mind, the Jewel and Its Setting]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Hundreds of references in TC to the heart are not casual but calculated.  The heart is both a vessel and something that can be placed within a vessel.  Allusions contrast Pandarus and Diomede with the two lovers and also contrast Criseyde with Troilus.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261871">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Heart: Chaucer&#039;s Concretization of Emotions]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes techniques used by medieval authors for presenting human emotions, drawing examples from various writers, and focusing on Chaucer&#039;s uses of the heart as a physical object or a concrete image in depicting the pains of love, whether caused by joy, sorrow, jealousy, anger, and the like. Includes examples from TC, BD, LGW, CT, Rom, and various other medieval works.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263674">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Heaven of Fourteenth-Century English Poets: An Examination of the Paradisaical References in the English Works of Chaucer, Gower, Langland, and the Pearl Poet]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer and English contemporaries held similar orthodox views of heaven derived from the Bible.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275018">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Heaviness of Prosopopoeial Form in Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Book of the Duchess.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that the Ceyx and Alcyone episode in BD, unlike its antecedents in Ovid and Machaut, reveals the inadequacy of &quot;elegiac poetics,&quot; particularly the formal strategy of prosopopoeia, to &quot;voice&quot; the dead. Similarly, in the body of the dream, White is spoken for rather than allowed to speak, a rhetorical deflection that is consistent with BD&#039;s eschewal of the conventions of consolation.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264178">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Hem of Philosophy: Free and Bound Motifs in the &#039;Franklin&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Why the digressions in FranT?  Formalist criticism identifies Dorigen&#039;s digression on the black rocks as a free (abstract) motif and, paradoxically, as an agent of the plot (normally a material motif).  Thus Chaucer makes abstraction the cause of action and thereby insists on the importance of theory to &quot;praxis&quot; in successful storytelling and of ideals to behavior in successful living.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266349">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Hengwrt &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;: Inadmissible Evidence?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes how the marginal note &quot;Stokes&quot; in the Hengwrt manuscript of CT may have been erased in a conservation project in 1956, arguing that attention must be given to facsimiles and descriptions as well as to manuscripts.  Explores the implications of the note for the provenance of the manuscript and announces the Hengwrt Project, which will compile and analyze the entire legacy of Hengwrt.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264075">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Hengwrt and Ellesmere Manuscripts of the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;: Different Scribes]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Statistical analysis shows CT MSS Hengwrt and Ellesmere as the work of two scribes of closely similar hands, who possibly trained under the same master.  The Ellesmere scribe himself is probably &quot;the source of much of the editing&quot; in that MS.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267647">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Hengwrt Chaucer Digital Facsimile]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Full-color complete facsimile of the Hengwrt manuscript (Hg) and the Merthyr fragment (Me) of CT. Includes transcriptions of Hg and the Ellesmere manuscript by Michael Pidd and Estelle Stubbs, arranged for comparison; transcription of Me by Paul Thomas and Peter Robinson; codicological descriptions of Hg and Me by Daniel W. Mosser; transcription of Hg glosses by Stephen Partridge; and an edition of the Welsh marginalia in Me, with an introduction by Ceridwen Lloyd-Morgan. Also includes a general introduction by Stubbs, a description of the &quot;digital capture&quot; by Gareth Lloyd Hughes and Simon Evans, and two critical articles (for these articles, search for Hengwrt Chaucer Digital Facsimile under Alternative Title). The information is fully searchable in normal language and SGML.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262334">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Hengwrt Manuscript and the Canon of &#039;The Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Largely ignored for forty years, Manly and Rickert&#039;s &quot;The Text of the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;&quot; is being reconsidered because it favors the Hengwrt.  Chaucer&#039;s text is now being reconstructed by &quot;Hengwrtism.&quot;  The soft approach takes Hengwrt as a guide but does not use the Hengwrt order of tales; the hard approach accepts readings exclusively Hengwrt and Hengwrt order.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Hanna examines the problem of CYT, which according to the hard approach is not part of the Chaucer canon, pointing out that &quot;the stages of production discernible in the manuscript do not resemble features one might expect in a finished codex&quot; and that the &quot;booklets&quot; comprising the various fragments are not necessarily in an intentional order, as is evidenced by an analysis of the scribal characteristics.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Evidence suggests that the Hengwrt team of scribes received materials piecemeal.  There is no a priori reason to reject the &quot;concept of split authority.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266705">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Hero as Editor: Sidney Lanier&#039;s Medievalism and the Science of Manhood]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Lanier in the early 1880s produced versions of Malory, Froissart, the Percy ballads, and other works aimed at exposing boys to the chivalry and simple piety of the Middle Ages.  The introduction to &quot;The Boy&#039;s Froissart&quot; cites Chaucer as a &quot;large and beautiful soul&quot; whose stance and language, exemplified by the envoi to Sted, provide a model of literary manhood.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275292">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Hero of the &quot;Troilus.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Traces the development of Troilus&#039; character in TC, arguing that he grows from ignorance to wisdom in confronting the &quot;fundamental mystery of the human condition&quot;: his noble, &quot;tragic error . . . is to have tried to love a human being with an ideal spiritual love.&quot; In this light, the poem is an &quot;exemplum of &quot;Boethius&#039; lesson that life within time derives from and reflects the life beyond time&quot;; its &quot;final effect&quot; is a &quot;sense of profound exaltation.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261878">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Heroes of Chaucer&#039;s Romances]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s chivalric heroes embody the theme of moral &quot;gentilesse,&quot; though these knights are often depicted as corrigibly flawed in their characters.  The romances emphasize their private lives (especially in love) over purely military or spectacular adventures.  They are controlled by a destiny that seems to limit their personal freedom.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273625">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Heroine in &quot;The Knight&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses the &quot;artistic function&quot; of Emily in KnT, focusing on her place in the theme of order. As the poem moves from chaos to order, she symbolizes &quot;psychological and cosmic order&quot; and serves as an &quot;exemplar of Fortune.&quot; As &quot;natural woman,&quot; she also is the &quot;object&quot; of courtly love and a &quot;member of society.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269811">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Heterosexual Subject of Chaucerian Narrative]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reports on how notions of heterosexual normativity can be used in classroom discussions of BD, TC, and CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274174">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Hidden Life of the Friars: The Mendicant Orders in the Work of Walter Hilton, William Langland, Geoffrey Chaucer, and Their Literary World.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comments on the presence and treatments of friars in three Middle English writers, including discussion of Chaucer&#039;s depictions of friars and the Friar in CT and his uses of anti-mendicant literature as source material.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>