<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263495">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Devil and His Panne: &#039;Friar&#039;s Tale&#039; D 1614]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[&quot;Panne&quot; in Chaucer&#039;s day sometimes designated a piece of clothing, sometimes a cooking utensil--and popular tradition associated the devil in hell with &quot;pannes&quot; (cooking utensils) and cauldrons.  Chaucer&#039;s early audiences would have recognized in FrT 1614 multiple meanings for &quot;panne.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263781">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Devil in Chaucer&#039;s Reeve]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Characteristics of the Reeve suggest stereotypes of a medieval devil:  his beardlessness, Northern origin, phlegmatic character, and sharp wit.  He fits all six literary types of the Devil in Hannes Varter&#039;s &quot;The Devil in English Literature.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268219">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Devil in Disguise: Perverse Female Origins of the Nation]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys originary myths in which human females have sex with supernatural beings, focusing on versions of the story of Albina and her sisters, who have sex with demons-incubi and give birth to the giants of Albion. Evans reads the Wife of Bath&#039;s comments on incubi (WBT 3.873-82) as a displacement of clerical myths.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273259">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Devil in Green]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Suggests that in FrT the association of the fiend in with the color green may show how exegetical tradition filtered into folklore.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271766">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Devil in the Garden: Pluto and Proserpine in Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Merchant&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines the allegorization of Pluto and Proserpine in the &quot;Ovide Moralisé&quot; and argues that it discloses how as figures of &quot;earthly lust&quot; their episode is well integrated into MerT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272934">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Devil&#039;s &#039;Privetee&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Suggests that in the drama of CT the Summoner&#039;s idea of friars residing in Satan&#039;s arse (SumP) was prompted by the demon&#039;s promise to the summoner in FrT that he would know the devil&#039;s &quot;privetee&quot; (3.1637), an echo of the Miller&#039;s claim about &quot;Goddes pryvetee&quot; (MilP 1.3164).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265938">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Devil&#039;s Bow and Arrows: Another Clue to the Identity of the Yeoman in Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Friar&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[It was commonly assumed in the Middle Ages that the devil carried arrows and shot them at his human prey.  That the Friar&#039;s &quot;yeoman&quot; bears arrows &quot;brighte and kene&quot; (1.1381) is yet another clue that escapes the stupid summoner.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276266">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Devonshire Manuscript Collection of Early Tudor Poetry, 1532-41.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes the Devonshire manuscript (Ds) and comments on its provenance. Newly identifies a Chaucer fragment in the manuscript (f. 59v) from TC 1.946-52.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264039">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Dialectic of &#039;The Book of the Duchess&#039; and &#039;The Parliament of Fowls&#039;: A Movement Toward the Fifteenth Century]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[BD and PF shift from &quot;belief to skepticism in Chaucer&#039;s attitude toward the three principal ways of arriving at truth--religious experience, written authorities, and revelations of dreams.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261848">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Dialectic of Adaptation: &#039;The Canterbury Tales&#039; of Pier Paolo Pasolini]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Pasolini in his &quot;Canterbury Tales&quot; identifies himself as Chaucer because his central concern is relationship of artist to art, focusing on sexuality and morality.  The Merchant&#039;s Tale and Wife&#039;s Prologue show respectability cloaking lust; the Friar&#039;s and Pardoner&#039;s Tales sexual and moral corruption; the Miller&#039;s, Reeve&#039;s, and Cook&#039;s liberated sexuality.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266408">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Dialectic of Divine Omnipotence in the Age of Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys the history and state of scholarship on a key concept of fourteenth-century nominalism--the dialectic of divine omnipotence--and its applications to Chaucerian and other Middle English texts.  Warns that a view of the &quot;potentia absoluta&quot; as undermining the self-binding, convenantal relation of God to his established &quot;ordo&quot; can lead scholars astray.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264937">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Dialectics of Debate and the Continuity of English Poetry]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Small debates turn on method, large debates on content--goals and purposes.  Chaucer&#039;s BD and the Old English &quot;Solomon and Saturn&quot; are comparable big debates.  In BD the Dreamer is converted, not refuted, when he recognizes the &quot;routhe&quot; the Knight asserts. Assertion rather than logic effects Saturn&#039;s similar conversion in the OE poem.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268930">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Dialogue of Love, Marriage and &quot;Maistrie&quot; in Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Canterbury Tales&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores the relationships between power (&quot;maistrie&quot;) and gender in CT as these relationships are reflected in conversation and the dialogue of spouses and lovers in seven Tales: MilT, WBT, ClT, MerT, FranT, ShT, and Mel. Using techniques of historical pragmatics, Pakkala-Weckstrom examines such matters as politeness strategies, forms of address, pronoun usage, and speech acts--especially as they operate under a variety of conditions, including literary genre and the status of medieval women.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266230">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Dialogue of Science and Magic in Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Squire&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The apparent &quot;magic&quot; of SqT is explicable via medieval understanding of the rational explanation of marvels.  Surveying medieval attitudes toward science and technology, DiMarco argues that the gifts of SqT are presented as scientific objects that operate in accord with principles such as the &quot;multiplication of species,&quot; the assumption that objects influence one another by emitting corporeal likenesses of themselves.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270362">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Dido-Aeneas Story from Vergil to Dryden]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Consider &quot;the two quite different versions of the Dido and Cleopatra stories as they appear in the works of major Latin and English poets, beginning with the commissioning of Virgil&#039;s &quot;Aeneid&quot; ca. 29 B.C. and carrying through to the publication of Dryden&#039;s translation&quot; of it in 1697.  Includes discussion of Chaucer&#039;s version of Dido and Cleopatra in HF and LGW.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272217">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Difficult Fifth Book of &#039;Troilus and Criseyde&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Treats various features of book 5 of TC (lack of proem, several amplifications, various sources) as &quot;apparently gratuitous or insufficiently integrated matter,&quot; evidence that Chaucer intended to write his poem in four books but found that he needed a fifth to convey a sense of duration. Also suggests that Chaucer released his work without completing the process of revision he applied to earlier books.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265009">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Digression on Marriage in &#039;The Franklin&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The marriage agreement in FranT and the Franklin&#039;s comment on &quot;maistrie&quot; are not functional parts of the tale, but digressive answers to the Wife, Clerk, and Merchant while obeying the Host&#039;s command to &quot;telle on thy tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268304">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Disappointments of Criseyde]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In TC, Criseyde&#039;s appeals to Hector for clarification of her status in Troy suggest that Criseyde seeks a romantic response from Hector rather than the official response she receives. This disappointment acts as a catalyst for future behavior in the narrative.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276293">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Discarded Image: An Introduction to Medieval and Renaissance Literature.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Intellectual backgrounds to the European Middle Ages and Renaissance, with particular attention to literature, classical, and late-classical influences; the concept of the universe and the earth; human physiology and psychology; and cultural influences on modern notions and idioms. Recurrent attention to Chaucer&#039;s works and their reflections and representations of the medieval/Renaissance world view.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273168">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Discourse of Marriage in the French Fabliaux and Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Shipman&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Offers ShT as an example of how the use of fabliaux aids an understanding and exploration of marital dynamics, suggesting that the tale presents the merchant&#039;s marriage as a sort of economic contract between equals.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268048">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Discourse of Seduction and Intrigue: Linguistic Strategies in Three Fabliaux in the Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines &quot;politeness strategies&quot; (ye/thou) and emotional language in light of genre expectations and characterization. In MilT, MerT, and ShT, wives use various linguistic strategies to manipulate their husbands and others, but the linguistic consistency of the wife in ShT indicates social mastery from the outset; Alison and May may achieve such mastery through the events of their plots.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268973">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Discourses of Chivalry and Courtly Love in Chaucer and Malory : With Particular Reference to The Knight&#039;s Tale and The Book of Tristram]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Greenwood contrasts Chaucer&#039;s and Malory&#039;s uses of models and antimodels in depictions of chivalry and courtly love.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266849">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Discussion of Love and Marriage in &#039;The Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[While depicting love and marriage in the Marriage Group, Chaucer presents the &quot;delights of both the flesh and the soul.&quot; The group opens with Mel; WBPT, ClT, and MerT offer extreme but lively views. FranT presents an ideal secular solution, while ParsT presents a religious ideal.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270379">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Diseased Soul in Chaucer, Boccaccio, and Poe]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses how and in what ways &quot;disease of both body and soul&quot; is a recurrent concern in CT, especially in fragment 6 which includes PhyT and PardT. Surmises that the fragment may have influenced Daniel Defoe&#039;s &quot;A Journal of the Plague Year,&quot; and observes how Chaucer&#039;s treatment of plague differs from Boccaccio&#039;s in his &quot;Decameron.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266142">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Disenchanted Classroom]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Max Weber&#039;s distinction between an &quot;ethics of commitment&quot; and an &quot;ethics of responsibility&quot; can help make the connection between theoretical assumptions and pedagogical practices explicit.  An &quot;ethics of commitment&quot; leads to the idea of the teacher as prophet; an &quot;ethics of responsibility&quot; encourages specialization and leads to a historicist approach.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>