<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263419">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Aspects of the Art of Portraiture in Medieval Literature, with Special Reference to the Use of &#039;Ethopoeia&#039; or &#039;Adlocutio&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines &quot;ethopoeia&quot; and &quot;adlocutio&quot; in characterizations and portraiture.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266297">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Aspects of the Post-War Reception of Chaucer: A Key Passage, Troilus II 666-679]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Critiques approaches to TC that separate the narrator of the poem from Chaucer, briefly tracing modern ideas of character and irony from Kittredge to Donaldson and Muscatine, and on to deconstruction and feminism.  New Critics and their descendants are wrong to impose a &quot;hermeneutics of        suspicion&quot; on Chaucer.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271213">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Aspects of Word Formation in Henryson&#039;s &#039;Fables&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Analyzes abstract noun formation (adding suffixes) in Robert Henryson&#039;s &quot;Fables&quot; and offers some brief comparisons with data from works by Chaucer.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270482">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Canterbury Tales: Adapted from Geoffrey Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Dramatic adaptation of portions of GP, KnT, WBT, PardT, FranT, NPT, and MilT, designed for &quot;youth groups and dramatic societies.&quot; Includes stage directions, brief production notes and instructions, property list, etc. Musical score for piano, by Derek Hyde.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274975">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Canterbury Tales.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Art edition of selections from CT: GP, MilT, RvT, FrT, MerT, WBT, SumT, and PardT, with collage-like illustrations that combine imagery from medieval and modern sources,]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264083">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Chaucerian Echoes in &#039;The Merchant of Venice&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Although Ann Thompson&#039;s &quot;Shakespeare&#039;s Chaucer: A Study in Literary Origins&quot; explores parallels between TC and LGW and &quot;The Merchant of Venice,&quot; it does not note the Chaucerian echoes in Portia&#039;s warning of Bassanio (5.1.23Off.), which is similar to the Wife of Bath&#039;s warning to her husband.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262084">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Chaucerian Themes in Scottish Writers]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[King James, Henryson, Dunbar, and Douglas were influenced by Chaucer rhetorically and stylistically, as well as in their choices of genre; but Gray emphasizes the influence of Chaucer&#039;s ideas and themes--noting particularly how Chaucer&#039;s &quot;powers&quot; of Nature and Fortune and the admirable human qualities of &quot;pite&quot; and &quot;gentilesse,&quot; in KnT, WBT, and PF, influenced these Scottish writers.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261960">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Chaucerian Traditions]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chap. I studies Chaucer&#039;s awareness of the assets and liabilities of working within a tradition in PF and Purse.  Chap. II argues that HF is finished.  Chap. III sees the contradiction between the Pardoner&#039;s confession and tale as an effort to put the pilgrims in a dilemma.  Chap. IV discusses Dunbar&#039;s use of Chaucerian themes.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268888">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Dialectical, Sociolectal and Communicative Aspects of Word Order Variation and Change in Late Middle English]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Eitler studies the development of the &quot;incipient standard&quot; syntactic pattern (subject-verb-object), comparing data from Chaucer&#039;s prose works with data from other ME prose, characterizing his idiom as the &quot;(relatively) upper class sociolect&quot; of London and suggesting that syntactic analysis encourages us to accept Chaucer&#039;s authorship of Equat.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264168">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Differences Between Boccaccio&#039;s and Chaucer&#039;s Tales of Griselda]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Departures from Boccaccio&#039;s tale of Griselda are examined to prove that Chaucer had been familiar with three other versions, those of Petrarch, MS 1165, and Mezieres.  Chaucer used differences in detail to add delicacy to enhance the emotional intensity of his tale and its characters.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263173">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Discarnational Impulses in the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[An &quot;earthscape of renewals and pilgrimages,&quot; CT is chiefly incarnational and pluralistic, with four exceptions.  As pious tales with separate value structures and terms of reference differing from the GP principle of &quot;purifying, abstracting and disheriting,&quot; MLT, CLT, SNT, and PrT are discarnational.  MLT and ClT emphasize the &quot;religious content of the female stereotype&quot;; SNT and PrT emphasize &quot;body-soul diversion.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264750">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Disputed Chaucerian Terminology]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In addition to etymologically undetermined words in Chaucer and to words whose ironic use obscures their true meaning, Chaucer&#039;s portrayal of characters (e.g., Reeve, Plowman, Yeoman, the widow of NPT, Griselda, and Symkyn in RvT) reveals that he was not &quot;class-conscious&quot; but rather disinterested in judging the morality and social status of bourgeois and peasantry.  More historical documentation of the words used to describe them will reveal even more.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263929">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Features of Medieval English Literature]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Ikegami analyzes in OE and ME literature formal problems of verse and prose, narratives, manuscripts and incunabula, Latin and vernaculars, to explain the differences between medieval and modern English literature.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In Japanese.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273630">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Fifteenth-Century Images of Death and Their Background.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Identifies and analyzes the motifs and imagery of death in England in the fourteenth century to the sixteenth, including discussion of the relatively positive depictions of death in TC and CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271609">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Fifteenth-Century Manuscripts of the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Distinguishes between two kinds of manuscripts of CT: those in which the entire poem is the sole item or the dominant one and those in which individual tales appear in anthologies. Focuses on the second kind, observing the moral or courtly nature of the anthologized tales and identifying more specific characteristics (readership, affiliations, Chaucer&#039;s repute), particularly those of two manuscripts held at the Huntington Library (Ph4 and Hn).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275271">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Functions of Medieval Rhetoric in Chaucer&#039;s Verse.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that Chaucer modified, extended, and developed the &quot;conventions&quot; of medieval rhetoric (including the &quot;doctrine of three styles&quot;), exploring his uses in light of  the &quot;Poetria Nova&quot; of Geoffrey of Vinsauf and the pseudo-Ciceronian &quot;Rhetorica ad Herennium.&quot; Includes discussion the &quot;three dream visions,&quot; TC, and various tales and prologues from CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272598">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Generic Distinctions in the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores Chaucer&#039;s uses of narrative terms, such as &quot;storie,&quot; &quot;tale,&quot; &quot;fable,&quot; &quot;tretys,&quot; &quot;tragedye,&quot; &quot;legend,&quot; etc.,&quot; focusing on their relative degrees of exposition, fictionality, and historicity and the faithfulness of the narratives to source material.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276278">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Implications of Chaucer&#039;s Folktales.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Offers a &quot;new look at Chaucer&#039;s folktales,&quot; distinguishing between written and oral analogues to portions of CT, focusing on oral motifs, and categorizing the tales in accord with the numbering system in the 1961 revised version of Stith Thompson&#039;s &quot;Types of the Folktale.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276754">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Implications of Chaucer&#039;s Irony.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Rejects Matthew Arnold&#039;s claim that Chaucer lacked &quot;high seriousness,&quot; commenting on the &quot;close interrelationship between the ironist and moralist&quot; in the older poet&#039;s works, and suggesting that, though genial in his acceptance of human variety and folly, Chaucer &quot;is not content merely to record the color and movement of his age&quot;; he critiques it with &quot;high comic irony&quot; and notable tragic touches.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272270">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Implications of Chaucer&#039;s Use of Astrology in the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines the significance of astrological allusions to the &quot;form and meaning&quot; of CT, particularly how they reflect and contribute to the work as a &quot;dramatic allegory&quot; of human pilgrimage through worldly sorrow.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263696">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Implications of Nature&#039;s Femininity in Medieval Poetry]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discussion of nature and woman in twelfth-century latin works of Bernardus Silvestris (&quot;Cosmographia&quot;) and Alain de Lisle (&quot;De planctu naturae&quot;)l, with comments on PR and the Wife of Bath.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261881">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Intellectual Themes in Chaucer&#039;s Poetry]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer deals with a concern of earlier poets--humanity&#039;s place in the universe--and with concerns of his own time--the bases and abuses of civil and ecclesiastical authority, the limits of human freedom, and the implications of will and character--not by providing answers but by using characters to test values.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265099">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Latin Sources of the Nonnes Preest on Dreams]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A detailed examination of Chaucer&#039;s principal direct source on significative dreams, Robert Holcot&#039;s commentary on The Book of Wisdom, &quot;Super Sapientiam Salomonis,&quot; and of Chaucer&#039;s method of constant mixture of various viewpoints (especially those of Cicero, Valerius, and Albertus) sheds light on Chaucer&#039;s &quot;heigh ymaginacioun forncast&quot; and the effect on the court audience of Chauntecleer as a learned clerk.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276274">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Medical Allusions in &quot;The Canterbury Tales.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes various disorders, discomforts, and diseases among the Canterbury pilgrims and in their tales, commenting on medieval and modern understandings of symptoms and causes.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271692">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Some Metonymic Relationships in Chaucer&#039;s Poetry]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines the word &quot;sad&quot; in ClT to show that meaning and nuance in Chaucer&#039;s poetry derive, not from patterns of similarity or metaphor, but from metonymic contiguity, which functions much as does the &quot;creative contiguity&quot; of Gothic juxtaposition. Borrows the term &quot;metonymic&quot; from linguist Roman Jacobson and shows that &quot;sad&quot; means &quot;constant in adversity&quot; and even &quot;serious cheerfulness,&quot; a reflection of &quot;heroic Christian stoicism&quot; that gains dimension through its contiguity with motherly.  Also comments on &quot;suffisaunce&quot; in TC as &quot;satisfaction&quot; or completeness, without satiety.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>