<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274979">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Selected Canterbury Tales.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Translation of selections from CT into Farsi verse. Item not listed in WorldCat; item not seen.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271003">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Selected Poems, Geoffrey Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Includes selections from GP, RvT, and FranT, along with selections from BD, HF, PF, TC, LGWP, and the complete Pity. Texts in Middle English, with occasional end-of-text glosses.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277385">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Selected Poems.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Item not seen. WorldCat record indicates that this volume includes a poem titled &quot;Opening Prologue of Chaucer&#039;s Canterbury Tales.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267017">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Selecting the &#039;Best&#039; in Chaucer for a Brief Survey Course]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[ParsT is the best of the CT to choose for a survey class. It provides a link with ancient and modern literature, reflects the thinking of the major writers in medieval England, and interweaves the previous themes and images of CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261207">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Selecting the Text: Rawlinson C.86 and Some Other Books for London Readers]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Rawlinson C.86 contains ClT and portions of PrT and LGW.  Analysis of the manuscript reveals interests of the contemporary London audience and suggests that several booklets in the manuscript may have been  produced on speculation.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273294">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Selections from Geoffrey Chaucer&#039;s The CanterburyTales.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A textbook edition of selections from CT (GP, MilPT, RvP, PardPT, PrPT, Tho, NPT, WBPT, ManPT, ParP, a selection from ParsT, and Ret) in Middle English, with facing-page glosses and end-of-text notes and commentary. Also includes passages from several sources and analogues and line drawings of the Pilgrims from the Ellesmere manuscript.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274323">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Selections from The Tales of Canterbury and Short Poems.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Edits CT (excluding Mel, MkT, SNT, CYT, and Pars), along with Ros, Form Age, Adam, Buk, Purse, and Truth, following the Robinson&#039;s edition of 1957, with modification from Manly and Rickert&#039;s collations. Marginal glosses and bottom-of-page notes accompany the text, followed by an end-of-text &quot;Basic Glossary&quot; (pp. 397-401). The Introduction (pp. vii-xxxvii) surveys Chaucer&#039;s life, works, techniques of characterization and verisimilitude in CT, and uses of source material, followed by commentary on order of the tales, Chaucer&#039;s language, and how to read Chaucer, as well as a brief critical bibliography.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270388">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Self-Referential Artifacts: Hoccleve&#039;s Persona as a Literary Device]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Analyzes Thomas Hoccleve&#039;s narrative persona in his &quot;Regement of Princes&quot; and his &quot;Series&quot; poems, treating it as a development out of &quot;the inherited Chaucerian narrator&quot; toward a psychological portrait marked by the deleterious effects of &quot;thought&quot; and &quot;studie&quot; and a harbinger of Shakespeare&#039;s &quot;Hamlet&quot; and Burton&#039;s &quot;Anatomy of Melancholy.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268967">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Self-Remembrance and the Memory of God : Chaucer&#039;s House of Fame and Augustinian Pschology]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Summarizes the Augustinian psychology of memory and its relationship to language, arguing that these concepts underlie the narrator&#039;s &quot;&#039;educational&#039; pilgrimage&quot; in HF. The end of the poem reflects the transformation of fiction into reality.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271924">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Selling Alys: Reading (with) the Wife of Bath]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores Chaucer&#039;s strategy of satire in WBPT, arguing that in its concern with interpretation and discursive insensibility it is fundamentally similar to the anti-mercantile satire of MerT, ShT, and MLT. Reads the Wife in &quot;a London context,&quot; associating her with guild-class silkwomen, and hypothesizes Chaucer&#039;s series of revisions to the Wife of Bath materials (including the manuscript glosses), which reduces mercantile concerns to those of gender and marriage while maintaining effective satire of the merchant estate.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274589">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Selling Satire: Gower, Chaucer, and the End of the Estates.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines how Chaucer and Gower handled the genre of &quot;estates satire,&quot; and speculates how &quot;their social critique moves away from an estates satire framework.&quot; Addresses mercantile practice in MerT, MLT, and WBT, and claims that Chaucer, like Gower, &quot;is able to include substantial critique of economic practices in the actions&quot; of characters in CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270002">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Selves and Nations: The Troy Story from Sicily to England in the Middle Ages]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Keller traces the medieval tradition of Troy narratives from Benoît de Saint-Maure and Guido delle Colonne through various Middle English adaptations, including TC.  Focuses on the literary interplay of imperial ambition--with its tendency to produce static notions of individual selfhood and forms of group identities--and a more flexible, vernacular sense of nationhood that provides a site for more complex explorations of individuality. The latter model originates in Benoît&#039;s Ovidian interpretation of the Troy story, whereas the former is encapsulated in Guido&#039;s Latin attempt to contain the destabilising effects of Benoît&#039;s account.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271983">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Semantic, Moral, and Aesthetic Degeneration in &#039;Troilus and Criseyde&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In TC, Chaucer shows the &quot;inter-relatedness of the moral and the aesthetic&quot; by demonstrating the &quot;corruption and debasement&quot; of key concepts: &quot;honour,&quot; &quot;worthiness,&quot; &quot;gentilesse,&quot; &quot;manhood,&quot; and &quot;trouthe.&quot; Such debasement reflects the inevitable failure of human pursuit of ideals and the parallel failure of the poet as creator to imitate the divine Creator.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263108">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Semantychni osoblhyvosti vstavnykh predykatyvnykh odynyts&#039; : Na materiali seredn&#039;oanhliis&#039;koi movy]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Deals with parenthetical constructions.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271601">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Semiotic Perception and the Problem of Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Prejudice&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considers strategies that have been used to accuse and excuse Chaucer (and others) of prejudice against women, homosexuals, and Jews, suggesting that medieval language theory and Chaucer&#039;s awareness of the semiotic gap between sign and signified (evident in NPT and elsewhere) encourages us to read the Wife of Bath, Pardoner, and Prioress as embodiments of semiotic awareness rather than prejudice.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270962">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Seneca and Chaucer: Translating both Poetry and Sense]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Laments the difficulties of translating wordplay, drawing examples from Chaucer to clarify examples from Seneca and other classical drama. Shows where modern translations of Chaucer&#039;s works lose puns, audio echoes, &quot;syllabic play,&quot; and anagrams]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266166">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Seneca y Chaucer, I: Influencia Senequista en &quot;The Canterbury Tales&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Demonstrates the influence of Seneca&#039;s moral philosophy on CT by assessing Chaucer&#039;s quotations of Seneca.  Translates Latin and Middle English quotations into both Spanish and modern English.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265655">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sens et Structure de &#039;The Wife of Bath&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines the pace of WBT as an example of the loathly hag story and reads in it echoes of several other Canterbury narratives.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264594">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sense and Sensibility in the &#039;Prioress&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Prioress&#039; preoccupation with emotion and the diminutive reflects the 14th century&#039;s concern for a particularized and emotional style in the arts.  Though her tale seems odd and inconsistent, it has a consistent sensibility which uses the particular to produce not types but emotional responses.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277232">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sense of Humour.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Introduces and anthologizes examples of humor in English literature, and critical analyses of it, arranged topically by humorous technique; includes Nevill Coghill&#039;s modern translation of the GP descriptions of the Wife of Bath and the Pardoner under the topic &quot;Humor by Observation.&quot; In the general Introduction discusses Chaucer as &quot;The Great Originator&quot; of humor in English writing, with particular attention to the &quot;family quarrel&quot; in NPT between Chaunticleer and Pertelote.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267832">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sense, Reference, and Wisdom in the Merchant&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reads MerT for the ways it confronts and rejects skeptical nominalism. The Merchant considers the possibility that language &quot;has sense but no reference&quot;--that it is only games--but the absurdity of January&#039;s decision to marry undercuts this notion, and Proserpina&#039;s assertion of God as the source of understanding affirms the reality of abstractions.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275603">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sensible Prose and the Sense of Meter: Boethian Prosimetrics and the Fourteenth Century.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores the rational power of prose and the affective power of poetry to effect ethical transformation in Boethius&#039;s &quot;Consolation of Philosophy,&quot; linking the work&#039;s prosimetric alteration with its theme of providential causation, and arguing that later vernacular writers modified the mixed form in ways that privilege poetry. Assessed as an extended example here, TC substitutes historical narration and emotive narratorial comment--both in verse--for the prose/poetry alternations of Boethius&#039;s mixed form.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270663">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sensible Prose and the Sense of Meter: Boethian Prosimetrics in Fourteenth-Century England]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considers the alternation between the pedagogy of argument (prose sections) and pleasure (metrical sections) in &quot;prosimetrum,&quot; arguing that the form of Boethius&#039;s &quot;Consolation&quot; was as essential as its content for writers such as Chaucer, Usk, Hoccleve, and Julian of Norwich.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277118">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sensory Satires and the Virtues of Herbs in Sir Thopas&#039;s Fair Forest.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Focuses on the medical effects of the herbs mentioned in Th to argue that the narrator&#039;s impetuosity demonstrates the effects of herbs he mentions in lines 760-65.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266160">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sentence and Judgment: The Role of the Fiend in Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In CT, generally, and in MLT, FrT, PhyT, PardT, and PrT, specifically, devils act as agents of God to tempt evildoers.  Although they fail, evildoers in CT are armed with the God-given ability to avoid such temptation through their reason, discretion, and wit.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>