<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276904">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Repressing a Perpetually Resurfacing Temporality: Four Authorial Orphans and the Fifteenth-Century &quot;The Legend of the Litel Clergeon&quot; and the Jews.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Interprets four manuscript versions of ClT (here retitled &quot;The Legend of the Litel Clergeon and the Jews&quot;) that occur outside the context of CT, &quot;excise&quot; Chaucer&#039;s authorship, and adjust their temporalities, addressing &quot;their own distinct identities, through scribal marginalia, nota marks, rubrication, jottings, and distinctive vocabulary choices.&quot; Treats British Library, MSS Harley 1704, Harley 2251, and Harley 2382; and Bodleian Library, MS Rawlinson C.86.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266880">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reproducing the Past: Gender and History in Later Middle English Romance and Popular Chronicle]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[At the crux of chronicle and romance, Geoffrey of Monmouth&#039;s &quot;Historia&quot; provides much of the basis for later literature. The work emphasizes women not only as child bearers but also as speakers who could uphold or deny legitimacy. Barefield discusses Nicholas Trevet, Mary of Woodstock, MLT, the prose Brut, and &quot;Sir Gawain and the Green Knight&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275207">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Republican Chaucer: Lucan, Lucrece, and the &quot;Legend of Good Women.&quot; ]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Shows that Lucan&#039;s &quot;Bellum civile,&quot; the medieval &quot;accessus&quot; tradition, and &quot;vitae Lucani&quot; together depict the Roman poet as a &quot;violated female,&quot; victimized by his &quot;tyrannical emperor,&quot; and abruptly silenced, arguing that this legacy influenced LGW (particularly LGWP, the account of Lucrece, and the abrupt ending of the poem), reflecting its critique of &quot;the loss of discursive and political liberty under the absolutist rule of Richard II.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265601">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Rereading Allegory: A Narrative Approach to Genre]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Defines allegory by structural features of plot rather than by content, surveying theory and history of the genre from the classics to contemporary criticism.  Briefly considers BD and PF as allegories.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275952">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Rereading Chaucer and Spenser: Dan Geffrey with the New Poete.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Twelve essays on Spenser&#039;s knowledge of and uses of Chaucer as source or inspiration. The introduction by the editors summarizes earlier critical studies, describes the essays, and asserts that the essays together &quot;characterise the relationships between Chaucer and Spenser as involving intervention rather than imitation, as temporally disruptive, and both playfully and materially bound to the conceptual and physical spaces of the text as object.&quot; The volume includes a &quot;select bibliography&quot; of works on Chaucer and Spenser, and an index. For individual essays, search for Rereading Chaucer and Spenser under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266740">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Rereading Guillaume de Machaut&#039;s Vision of Love: Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Book of the Duchess&#039; as &#039;Bricolage&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that in reading BD medieval audiences would also have reread Machaut&#039;s &quot;Fonteinne Amoureuse&quot; and recalled other works by Chaucer&#039;s predecessor. Chaucer&#039;s derivative version of the account of Ceyx and Alcyone &quot;thematizes the story as a rereading,&quot; and, drawn from sections in Machaut spoken by women, the Black Knight&#039;s complaints feminize him, a radical &quot;translation.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264051">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Researches in &#039;Troilus and Criseyde&#039; in Japan]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[TC scholarship is reviewed.  It is important to read TC in terms of the Christian view of life.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In Japanese.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267294">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Residue in the Mind in Chaucer&#039;s The House of Fame]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses the &quot;images&quot; of several scenes in HF, following V. A. Kolve&#039;s article &quot;Chaucer and the Visual Arts&quot; (1975).]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In Japanese.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277466">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Resistance to Love in Medieval English Romance: Negotiating Consent, Gender and Desire.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Anatomizes the motif of resistance to love &quot;across the chronology and variety of medieval English romance, from twelfth-century Anglo-Norman lais to fifteenth-century prose works,&quot; exploring &quot;ways in which it reinforces or subverts contemporary cultural constructions of consent, gender, and desire,&quot; with attention to issues of race, class, and religious faith. Includes discussion of TC, FranT, MLT, and WBT, with comments on KnT and MerT. Narrows and focuses the author&#039;s 2021 Ph.D. thesis (Durham University), &quot;Unwillingness to Love in Medieval English Romance: Consent, Coercion, and the Conventions of the Genre.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266612">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Resisting Chaucerian Misogyny: Reinscribing Criseyde]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines feminist and antifeminist readings Criseyde, arguing that--like Chaucer, who appropriates his sources, and like his narrator, who constantly negotiates and repositions himself in relation to Lollius--Criseyde performs, mimes, and parodies gendered behavior and language, appropriating them for her own purposes.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276173">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Resisting Sex and Species in &quot;The Squire&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reassesses the role and value of the falcon and the mechanical horse in SqT. Demonstrates through these depictions that SqT creates &quot;interspecies and intrasexual relationships of care outside of the gendered human norms of chivalric romance.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267305">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Responding to the Monk]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Critical response to essays on MkT by Ann W. Astell, Terry Jones, Henry Ansgar Kelly, Stephen Knight, and Richard Neuse.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268803">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Response : Chaucerian Values]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Expresses concerns about contemporary higher education--from &quot;prevailing careerism to the overall decline in literary reading&quot;--and encourages &quot;Chaucerian values&quot; among university administrators.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275904">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Response Essay: Chaucer&#039;s Inquisition.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Responds to the nine essays in this volume, exploring relations among inquisition, innovation, creativity, and imagination. Discusses LGWP as a poem that &quot;seeks its inventiveness in law at the same time that it invites its readers to enjoy the inquisition of the poet&quot; and thereby &quot;generates an authorship that feels modern, rather than pre-modern.&quot; Parallels the inquisitorial list of Chaucer&#039;s works in LGWP with the confessional one in Ret.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277522">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Response Essay: Islamicate Fictionalities and Transcultural Inter/connections]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Responds to essays included in a special issue of &quot;postmedieval,&quot; and comments on SqT, identifying ways that the work and its brass steed--&quot;belong to a world of the &quot;sıra&quot; in ways that reflect the entangled and often diffuse ways that fictional motifs moved not only within and across the Islamicate, but into western European imaginations.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276550">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Response to &quot;#MeToo, Medieval Literature, and Trauma-Informed Pedagogy.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Responds to earlier essays in NCSPP, adding comments on the sexual biases of the opening of GP, comparison of the Man in Black of BD and Marie de France&#039;s Guigemar, Chauce&#039;&#039;s (and others&#039;) self-deprecation as a form of (sexualized) power, and thoughts on &quot;cancelling Chaucer&quot; as a form of curricular experimentation.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275582">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Response to Carol L. Robinson, &quot;Go Ask Alisoun: Geoffrey Chaucer and Deafland (Deafness as Authority).&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A group of &quot;deaf/Deaf/hard of hearing scholars with wide-ranging expertise in literary studies, rhetoric, disability studies, and Deaf Studies&quot; express &quot;deep reservations&quot; about Robinson&#039;s essay.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277086">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Response to Leah Schwebel and Jennifer Alberghini.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Responds to two essays concerned with sexual consent in medieval literature, including Leah Schwebel, &quot;Chaucer and the Fantasy of Retroactive Consent.&quot; SAC 44 (2022): 337–45. Suggests that we might read RvT &quot;as an incel revenge fantasy.&quot;<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277132">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Response to Micah James Goodrich and Alice Raw.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comments on issues of complaint and consent in two essays included in this volume of SAC, linking the medieval past with the present. Includes response to Micah James Goodrich, &quot;The Yeoman&#039;s Canon: On Toxic Mentors.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275189">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Response: The &quot;Book of the Duchess,&quot; Guillaume de Machaut, and the Image of the Archive]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considers how technologies of memory inform reflections on composition, literary relationships, and the elegiac project in BD, engendering a &quot;focused commentary&quot; on the &quot;work of recollection.&quot; In this, BD participates in a discursive field shared by several works by Machaut, particularly the &quot;Prologue.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273242">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Responses to Ockhamist Theology in the Poetry of the &#039;Pearl&#039;-Poet, Langland, and Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In TC and &quot;several important&quot; tales of CT, Chaucer expresses more &quot;confidence in human nature&quot; than do Langland or the &quot;Pearl&quot;-poet in their works. He indicates the human need for divine Providence and assurance that &quot;God will not use his absolute power to overrule or contradict the covenant with man.&quot;  In this way, he steers a middle ground between the &quot;extremes of the Ockhamists and the Augustinians&quot; in the late-medieval nominalist-realist debate.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277103">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Restless Rewritings: The Politics of Enigma and Exposure in the &quot;Squire&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considers the role of spectacle in SqT, comparing the poetic strategies for inscribing spectacle to Richard Maidstone&#039;s approach in &quot;Concordia.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263321">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Restraining Ambiguities in Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Troilus and Criseyde&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The allusion to Thesiphone (TC 1.6) may resonate with passages in Statius and Boccaccio that connect the Fury with &quot;discordant, perverse, sterile, potentially demonic sexuality&quot; (p. 561).  The allusion in TC links Criseyde&#039;s possible childlessness with &quot;sterile love&quot; but should not push readers to assume a sexual encounter between Criseyde and Pandarus.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264432">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Resurrection as Dramatic Icon in the Shipman&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In the Noah&#039;s Flood motif of MilT, the audience delightedly and ruefully recognizes the consequences of the perversion of God&#039;s order.  In addition to visual or other sensory images (the runaway mare in RvT) Chaucer employs also dramatic icons, as in ShT, a &quot;parodic enactment of Christ&#039;s Resurrection appearance to Mary Magdalen.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270154">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Retelling Chaucer&#039;s Wife of Bath for Modern Children: Picture Books and Evolving Feminism]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Modern adapters of Chaucer interfere with the transmission of Chaucer by infusing their own values. In each era, the versions written for children bear witness to what aspects of feminism have reached popular culture.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>