<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268222">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Refiguring the &#039;Scandalous Excess&#039; of Medieval Woman: The Wife of Bath and Liberality]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Connects Alison&#039;s sexual liberality in WBP with the loathly lady&#039;s liberality of counsel in WBT, arguing that Chaucer &quot;redoctrinates&quot; his audience by converting notions of feminine excess into the positive virtue of generosity. Also considers Blanche&#039;s liberality in BD.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266792">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reflecting Pools: The Thematic Construction of Gender in Medieval Romance]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Analyzes the motif of the reflecting pool in works by Chretien de Troyes, Guillaume de Lorris, Jean de Meun, Chaucer, and John Gower.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[These works indicate that gender stereotypes become more rigid through time and that representations of feminine power faded in Western tradition.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263002">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reflections in a Golden Florin: Chaucer&#039;s Narcissistic Pardoner]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Jungian &quot;puer aeternus&quot; concept clarifies the relationship between the Pardoner and the Host, who fills the role of &quot;senex.&quot;  The Knight&#039;s (negative) intervention reveals him as a positive &quot;senex&quot; figure.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268691">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reflections of the Book of Job and Gregory&#039;s Moralia in Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Monk&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Despairing in his sin, the Monk ignores the providential aspect of the story of Job, and so his tragedies emphasize only death. He particularly ignores the conventionally exegetical readings of Adam and Sampson as examples of Providence.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272018">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reflections on a Gloss to the &#039;Prioress&#039;s Tale&#039; from Jerome&#039;s &#039;Adversus Jovinianum&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys critical discussions of Chaucer&#039;s authorship of the &quot;substantive&quot; glosses that appear in his manuscripts, shows that the glosses to PrT 7.579-85 derive from Jerome&#039;s &quot;Adversus Jovinianum&quot; rather than from the liturgy of the Holy Innocents, and argues that these glosses were written by Chaucer and provide evidence of his &quot;creative process,&quot; especially his intention to set the view of virginity in PrT in counterpoint to that in WBP.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276583">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reflections on Chaucer, Pedagogy, and the Profession of Medieval Studies]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Recounts personal experiences of studying PrT and its reception as a prelude to examining the role and status of medieval studies in twenty-first-century British educational culture, particularly its inequalities, colonialisms, and appropriations, and efforts to combat them.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269193">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reflections on D. W. Robertson, Jr., and &#039;Exegetical Criticism&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A search of contemporary Chaucerian criticism for signs of whether D. W. Robertson&#039;s &quot;exegetical criticism&quot; continues to generate important work yields the conclusion &quot;no, yes, and perhaps&quot;: &quot;no,&quot; in the wake of the ascendance of historicist criticism; &quot;yes,&quot; in the form of work that establishes new exegetical categories; and &quot;perhaps,&quot; in work that corrects, &quot;deconstructs,&quot; and provides &quot;new syntheses&quot; of Robertson&#039;s legacy.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277026">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reflections on Editing &quot;Studies in the Age of Chaucer&quot; 2007-13.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comments on editing SAC and offers personal and historical perspective on the journal&#039;s development.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270103">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reflections on Studying the Middle Ages Abroad: A Former Student&#039;s Thoughts and Suggestions]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comments on experiences as a student visiting London, Canterbury, and Greece.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271464">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reflections on Teaching Chaucer and Religion: The Nun&#039;s Priest Tale and the Man of Law&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Suggestions for using NPT and MLT for teaching the religious elements of Chaucer in secondary, undergraduate, and postgraduate MA level classes.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263233">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reflections on the &#039;Allegory of the Theologians,&#039; Ideology and &#039;Piers Plowman&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reacting to critical theorists--Bakhtin, Derrida, De Man, Eagleton, Lentricchia, and others--Aers writes an essay as a meditation on &quot;glosynge&quot; in SumT 1788-96.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264734">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reflexive verbs in Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[An analysis of reflexive verbs in Chaucer within the case grammar framework.  It shows the possibility of the semantic motivation of the reflexive pronoun and of a finer distinction of reflexivity in terms of the semantic relationship among the verb, reflexive pronoun, and other elements of the sentence.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268082">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reform and Cultural Revolution]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The volume surveys the literature of late medieval and early modern English writers in relation to political institutions contemporary with the literature, tracing an arc of &quot;diminishing liberties.&quot; Simpson characterizes the shift in literature from the medieval to the modern as rigidification of generic categories, narrowing of options, and focusing of rhetorical expansiveness-reflections of how medieval reforming instincts gave way in time to totalitarian pressures of church and state. Individual chapters address particular literary modes (tragic, elegiac, political, comic, dramatic, and various religious modes).]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer is considered for his place in an &quot;Ovidian&quot; elegiac tradition, his roles in the shift from Ricardian to Lancastrian poetics and beyond, his representations of religious suffering, and his uses of the comic mode, especially in the various romances of CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276938">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reformation Lists: Syntax, the Sacred, and the Production of Junk.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses the syntax and rhetorical/literary functions of the &quot;open-ended list that forms part of a sentence,&quot; focusing on those composed during the &quot;cultural revolution&quot; at the beginning of the Reformation in sixteenth-century England, but framed by discussion of syntactical contrasts between apposition in the list in House of Rumour in HF 1951-76 and hypotaxis in the opening of Milton&#039;s &quot;Paradise Lost&quot; 1.1-10.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269504">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reformations: Three Medieval Authors in Manuscript and Movable Type]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Circumstances of transmission affect not only how authors are received but also how they write. This effect was particularly strong in late medieval culture, when authors such as Chaucer, William Langland, and Margery Kempe were aware that readers used and reworked their texts. Schoff considers themes of reception, group dynamics, and the flexibility of sources in WBP and FrT, comparing them with concerns of textual stability in ClT, PardT, and MLT. Also examines how apocryphal additions to CT manuscripts (including endings to CkT) reveal readers&#039; reactions to Chaucer&#039;s textual dynamics, concluding with analysis of how early editors used and adjusted the manuscripts.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268830">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reforming Chaucer: Margins and Religion in an Apocryphal Canterbury Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Studies the marginalia printed with the 1606 edition of &quot;The Plowman&#039;s Tale,&quot; arguing that it challenges both Papal authority and the Church of England, encouraging Puritanism. Also discusses the place of this edition in the tradition of Chaucer reception.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271470">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reframing the &#039;Metamorphoses&#039;: The Enabling of Political Allegory in Late Medieval Ovidian Narrative]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Proposes that Chaucer, Gower, Lydgate, and other contemporaries may have viewed Ovid&#039;s work not merely as a source of exempla, but as a rhetorical model for subversive stories.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268105">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reframing the Violence of the Father: Reverse Oedipal Fantasies in Chaucer&#039;s Clerk&#039;s, Man of Law&#039;s, and Prioress&#039;s Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Straus explores how ClT, MLT, and PrT adapt and accommodate the traditions and conventions of the family romance to &quot;articulate a profound cultural anxiety about paternity.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275530">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Refugee Tales [I–IV].]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Anthologizes in four volumes oral accounts by asylum seekers and immigrants detained in Britain and elsewhere, recorded by various poets and novelists, and modelled on the CT, with an opening Prologue in each volume, followed by narratives with titles that emulate Chaucer&#039;s tales (e.g., &quot;The Migrant&#039;s Tale,&quot; &quot;The Detainee&#039;s Tale,&quot; etc.).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267870">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Regards: Criseyde, Troilus, Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[TC illustrates the mechanisms of perception, memory, and imagination as defined by fourteenth-century scientific theories. The two protagonists are enmeshed in a net of gazes--their own as well as those of others--and the narrative unfolds as viewed through a camera. The &quot;mise-en-abyme&quot; distances both the hero and the spectator-reader from this earth.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276163">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Regendering Griselda on the London Stage.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Observes that ClT sets its view of marriage in opposition to WBPT, suggesting that this reflects Chaucer&#039;s familiarity with Boccaccio&#039;s &quot;Decameron&quot; and inspired &quot;the reversal of Griselda&#039;s gender&quot; in two early modern English plays, analyzed here: &quot;The Pleasant Comedie of Patient Grissil&quot; by Thomas Dekker, Henry Chettle, and William Haughton; and &quot;The Honest Whore, Part I&quot; by Thomas Middleton and Thomas Dekker.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266530">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Regimes of the Visual in Premodern England: Gaze, Body, and Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Clerk&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[ClT is about visual investigation.  Contemporary manuscript illumination, panel painting, and statuary are instructive for understanding Chaucer&#039;s representations of lines of sight framing the female body.  Relying on complex tensions between an eroticized body and repression of its own eroticizing hints, ClT presents Griselda&#039;s body as inflected by doubled and contradictory codes governing how bodies, sacred and profane, can be seen and known.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261479">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Regionalism in Late Medieval Manuscripts and Texts: Essays Celebrating the Publication of a Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval England]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Eleven essays on such topics as the theory and techniques of dialect comparison, the texts of Skelton and Dunbar, the N-town manuscript, and specific manuscripts.<br />
For individual essays that pertain to Chaucer, search for Regionalism in Late Medieval Manuscripts and Texts under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268171">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Register, Politics, and the Legend of Good Women]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s political commentary is often disguised by ambiguity--the refusal ever to mean one thing--and the multiple nuances of his words. In revising LGWP, Chaucer inserted allusions to the &quot;dangerous talk&quot; of his day--to texts and interpretation but also to &quot;contemporary controversies about oppression.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268382">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Registers in Chaucer&#039;s Pardoner&#039;s Prologue and Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Applies &quot;register-theory&quot; to PardPT to demonstrate Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Gothic&quot; juxtapositioning of various kinds of discourse. Jeffrey examines the mode, domain, topic, and tenor of the discursive units in PardPT and suggests that the characteristic variety of CT can be laid clear through such analysis.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>