<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274856">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Petrarch and Chaucer on Fame.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys &quot;the idea literary fame&quot; in classical and medieval traditions (Homer, Hesiod, Virgil, Statius, and Dante); analyzes Petrarch&#039;s notion more extensively; and examines HF to show that though Chaucer, &quot;like Petrarch, was intimately familiar with the fickleness and absurdity of worldly fame, he betrays a longing for a posthumous literary fame.&quot; Includes an abstract in Chinese.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270304">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Petrarch and Petrarchism: The English and French Traditions]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[An introduction to Petrarch, his works, and their reception in England and France to the seventeenth century. Observes connections between the end of Petrarch&#039;s &quot;Canzoniere&quot; and Chaucer&#039;s Ret, and comments on Chaucer&#039;s reference to Petrarch in ClP and his translation of the Italian&#039;s sonnet in the &quot;Canticus Troili&quot; of TC. Also comments on Thomas Watson&#039;s reference to Chaucer&#039;s translation in a note to his own translation of the sonnet (published 1582).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267366">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Petrarch, Boccaccio, and Chaucer&#039;s Clerk&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that Chaucer used Boccaccio&#039;s version of the Griselda story in addition to Petrarch&#039;s. A number of Chaucer&#039;s alterations and additions to Petrarch have a &quot;strong, often detailed relationship&quot; to Boccaccio, Petrarch&#039;s own source.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266903">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Petrarch, Chaucer and the Making of the Clerk]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses how the Host&#039;s address to the Clerk reflects effort to shape the identity of the Clerk as a tale-teller, so that even before the Clerk speaks, literary, philosophical, and spiritual discourses compete to define his subjectivity.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265043">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Petrarch&#039;s &#039;Griselda&#039;: An English Translation]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Translation, with critical introduction.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Rather than offering a faithful translation intended only to promote Boccaccio&#039;s story, Petrarch&#039;s version transforms it,changing tone, proportions and comparative character development, relinquishing psychological realism for Christian allegory, and appealing to an elite audience able to understand the delicately cultivated pathos as well as the Latin.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273029">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Petrarch&#039;s Pleasures, Chaucer&#039;s Revulsions, and the Aesthetics of Renunciation in Late-Medieval Culture]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores a relationship between &quot;late-medieval aesthetics and renunciation&quot; in ClT and establishes differences between Petrarch&#039;s and Chaucer&#039;s treatments of the Griselda story. Points out that Chaucer&#039;s Clerk challenges both Petrarch&#039;s &quot;absolutist&quot; and his &quot;aesthetic values.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272178">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Petrarkistische Lyric]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys the influence of Petrarchan materials and traditions in European literature of various eras, including brief comments (p. 45) on Chaucer&#039;s uses of Petrarchan materials.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265591">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Petrus Alfonsi and His Medieval Readers]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys the life and works of Petrus Alfonsi and the reception of his two major works:  the anti-Jewish &quot;Dialogi contra Iudaeos&quot; and his collection of tales and wisdom literature, &quot;Disciplina clericus.&quot;  Tolan briefly mentions Mel as evidence of Chaucer&#039;s regard for Petrus as an authority, an attitude widely reflected in the &quot;Disciplina&#039;s&quot; popularity as a preachers&#039; handbook and a source of proverbs and tales.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276188">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Pets.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reviews medieval disapproval of pet-keeping among religious personnel as evidence that companionship with animals has a long history and that medieval &quot;pet-love&quot; can &quot;help us to unthink the human.&quot; Comments on pet-slayings in versions of the international &quot;Canis legend&quot; and, positing that the love of animals in the GP description of the Prioress is sincere, argues that it reflects a queer version of community, one that prompts us to (re)consider our own.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270030">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Peynted by the Lion: The Wife of Bath as Feminist Pedagogue]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reads the Wife of Bath as ur-feminist and traces parallels between WBP and WBT. These parallels indicate the Wife&#039;s efforts to teach feminist principles.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273645">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Phantom and the &quot;House of Fame.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores various denotations in medieval uses of &quot;phantom,&quot; and contends that Chaucer&#039;s use of the word in HF (line 493) capitalizes on these meanings and neatly encapsulates the poem&#039;s fundamental concern with the difficulties of seeking to recognize and express &quot;error and truth.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271528">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Philippa of Lancaster, Queen of Portugal--and Patron of the Gower Translations?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Coleman argues that Philippa of Lancaster, oldest legitimate daughter of John of Gaunt and queen of Portugal from 1387, sponsored the Portuguese and Castilian translations of Gower&#039;s &quot;Confessio&quot; Amantis. Philippa may also have been responsible for an analogue to Chaucer,s Pardoner,s Tale that turns up in Hermengildo de Tancos&#039; &quot;Orto do esposo.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275784">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Philippa Pan⸱, Philippa Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Offers historical, onomastic, and contextualizing evidence to support the argument that Philippa Paon (or &quot;Panetto,&quot; abbreviated &quot;Pan⸱&quot; in the documents) married Chaucer, tracing their affiliations with English royalty, particularly Queen Philippa; her daughter, Elizabeth of Ulster; and granddaughter, Philippa of Eltham.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266363">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Phillip Larkin at Oxford: Chaucer, Langland, and Bruce Montgomery]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Philip Larkin&#039;s undergraduate essays and notes, preserved among Bruce Montgomery&#039;s papers at the Bodleian Library, record his reactions to Chaucer (generally positive) and Langland (negative).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262392">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Philologia Anglica: Essays Presented to Professor Yoshio Terasawa on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Includes forty-two articles. For seven essays that pertain to Chaucer, search for Philologia Anglica under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266398">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Philological Applications of Play and Game Theory]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Literary uses of play and game both subvert and reinforce social order while encouraging readers to become involved.  Medieval works tend to relate chivalry and war to game and play, while Platonism questions their value.  Considers TC among works ranging from &quot;Sir Gawain and the Green Knight&quot; to works of Swift.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267559">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Philological Theory in Sources and Analogues]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Defines the assumptions underlying J. Burke Severs&#039;s analysis of the relation of ClT to Petrarch&#039;s version of the material and clarifies how Farrell&#039;s own assumptions differ from those in his analysis for Sources and Analogues II. Severs was more confident in his assumptions and less sensitive to the evidence of the glosses and to textual mouvance.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268978">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Philomela]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys versions and adaptations of the Philomela-Procne-Tereus story from Euripides through Timberlake Wertenbaker&#039;s &quot;Love of the Nightingale&quot; (1988), observing overt and submerged motifs of incest and lesbianism. In LGW, the motifs are underscored by a concern with speech and speechlessness.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274866">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Philomela Accuses.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Investigates several motifs in the LGW account of Philomela: victimhood, &quot;inappropriate sovereignty,&quot; muteness, orality and legal witnessing, &quot;tapestry-as-prosthesis,&quot; rape as a property crime, and lack of legal remedy, arguing that Chaucer&#039;s tale evinces &quot;interest in women&#039;s control over their own bodily integrity&quot; simultaneously acknowledging that this interest is &quot;ultimately unproductive when . . . not matched with action.&quot; Includes comments on PrT and on Ovid&#039;s and Gower&#039;s versions of the story of Philomela.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271955">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Philosophical &#039;Entente&#039; of Particulars: Criseyde as Nominalist in Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Troilus and Criseyde&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that Criseyde is a &quot;willful agent,&quot; who reveals &quot;nominalist intentions&quot; and is guided by her own desires and &quot;misdirected will&quot; in her love of Troilus.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268937">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Philosophical Chaucer : Love, Sex, and Agency in the Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Although Chaucer is often considered a poet of love or of philosophy, an examination of the philosophical facets of CT--especially practical reason, individual agency, and autonomy--illuminates the ideologies of sex, gender, and love within his works. This analysis encourages a reformulation and broadening of our understanding of ideology and practical reason and their relationship to normativity. In MilT and KnT, natural impulses are in tension with practical reason.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A reading of the Consolation of Philosophy provides a foundation for understanding &quot;why normativity resists grounding in a comprehensive theory,&quot; illustrating in the Prisoner a tension between desire and action and thus exploring the mutually shaping forces of practical rationality and psychological phenomena. Close reading of the Roman de la Rose provides a better understanding of how these forces shape eroticism in Chaucer, especially as it appears in WBP, WBT, and ClT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269562">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Philosophical Sleaze? The &#039;Strok of Thoght&#039; in the Miller&#039;s Tale and Chaucerian Fabliau]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s special contribution to the fabliau genre is the design whereby apparently disconnected, often spontaneous plot incidents are suddenly &quot;knit up&quot;--that is, perceived by readers as belonging to a providential master plan. Although MilT is the prime example, all of Chaucer&#039;s fabliaux are informed by Boethian philosophy. Chaucer as author assumes the role of Maker, bringing his audience to a moment of epiphany in which what appeared to be chance is perceived as part of a larger design.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273024">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Philosophy in Parts: Jean de Meun, Chaucer, and Lydgate]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines how writings of Jean de Meun and Chaucer focus on issues of scholastic  philosophy and skeptical tradition. Refers specifically to Chaucer&#039;s uses of &quot;systematic philosophy&quot; as a narrative tool in WBT, PF, KnT, and TC.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275944">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Philosophy, Logic, and Nominalism.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Introduces various philosophical movements and thought prevalent in the fourteenth century, demonstrating the various philosophies available to Chaucer. Discusses Chaucer&#039;s use and view of nominalism and his attitudes toward free will and determinism.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269452">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Phonetic Variation in the Traditional English Dialects: A Computational Analysis]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Employing the &quot;standard&quot; ME dialect of the Home Counties of southeastern England as a baseline, Shackleton applies a number of quantitative variational measures (clustering, distance regressions, variant-area regressions, barrier analysis, and principal-components analysis) to 57 ME-derived long vowels, short vowels, and diphthongs. Shackleton comments on the success of each approach and concludes that the techniques complement each other as means of delineating modern dialect localities.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>