<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273179">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Monumental Visions: Architectural Ekphrasis from Chaucer to Jonson]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines HF in context of architectural descriptions in early English texts, and connects Chaucer&#039;s inspiration to an actual building in Westminster.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266582">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Monuments of Time: Time and the Semiology of Inscription in the Literature of the Later Middle Ages]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Ancient writings, especially inscriptions in stone, impressed the medieval reader as the most reliable of records of past wisdom, even though they might be paradoxical or, eventually, disregarded.  Considers &quot;Queste del Saint       Graal,&quot; HF, and Malory.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272979">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Mood, Tense, Pronouns, Questions: Chaucer and the Poetry of Grammar]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Emphasizes Chaucers skillful and &quot;poetic&quot; use of grammar, with special attention  to nouns and pronouns in TC. Also addresses Chaucer&#039;s focus on rhetoric  and logic in GP and ClT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261346">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Moral and Aesthetic Falls on the Canterbury Way]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The imagery of falling reinforces CT&#039;s penitential motif at the end of PardT, in NPP, in ManP, and in Ret, affectively leading the reader &quot;through art to morality.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268432">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Moral and Social Identity and the Idea of Pilgrimage in the General Prologue]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Morgan critiques modern claims for Chaucer&#039;s innovation in GP, arguing that Chaucer&#039;s methods resulted from the moral and artistic training of his time. We should read the pilgrim Chaucer both as earnest and as effective in displaying the sins of his fellow travelers.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264703">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Moral Chaucer and Kindly Gower]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The epithets &quot;moral&quot; and &quot;kindly&quot; have for centuries been applied, respectively, to Gower and Chaucer, with a deleterious effect upon critical evaluation of the two poets.  The epithets can revealingly be reversed.  Gower is seen as kindly in his treatment of sexual matters (notably rape and incest in tales from &quot;Confessio Amantis,&quot; for instance; while Chaucer&#039;s morality, though never obtrusive, is to be found even in such &quot;immoral&quot; tales as MerT, FranT, and WBP.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275984">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Moral Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses the &quot;narrowness&quot; of modern views of Chaucer and CT, and argues that this posture hides the range of Chaucer&#039;s verse, which includes not only beast fables and fabliaux, but also saints&#039; lives and penitential discourse. ]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273566">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Moral Obligations, Virtue Ethics, and &quot;Gentil&quot; Character in Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Franklin&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that the Franklin presents a formula for happiness: living a life of &quot;gentilesse&quot; as opposed to the principle of adhering to a law-based system of morality.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261241">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Moral Pattern in The Testament of Cresseid]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considers The Testament of Cresseid as a &quot;parallel text&quot; to TC 5, arguing that although Henryson echoes various Chaucerian collocations, techniques, and structures, his counterpointing of fickle and stable earthly love is unlike Chaucer&#039;s opposition of earthly and heavenly love.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261891">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Moral Seriousness in &#039;The Canterbury Tales&#039;: Human Conduct and Providential Order in the &#039;Knight&#039;s Tale,&#039; &#039;Franklin&#039;s Tale,&#039; and &#039;Parson&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[KnT, FranT, MLT, NPT, and ParsT all reveal the Providential plan for the world as benign.  Despite the irony, CT upholds Boethian Christian ideals.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269235">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Morality and Immorality]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Green confronts &quot;the interpretive function of morality in medieval literature&quot; and discusses why Chaucer&#039;s &quot;moral horizons&quot; in CT are elusive. Many of the Tales include competing morals; frameworks such as estates satire and the seven deadly sins were adapted to different ends and contested by different perspectives. Language itself accommodates &quot;disparate moral standards,&quot; evident in the changing meanings of &quot;trouthe&quot; in the late fourteenth century.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277316">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Morality as a Comic Motif in the Canterbury Tales.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Identifies the &quot;contrast between surface respectability and corrupt motive [as] the keenest source of the comedy&quot; in ShT, and suggests that there is a pun on &quot;cozen&quot; and &quot;cousin.&quot; Explores similar contrasts and other devices in CT that produce comic irony rather instead of moral assertion: suggestive imagery and juxtaposition, the &quot;simplicity&quot; of the CT narrator, &quot;double exposure, first of the pilgrim, then indirectly of the futility of overt moral stricture,&quot; and self-exposing conflicts between sets of pilgrims.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271459">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Morality in the &#039;Canterbury Tales,&#039; Chaucer&#039;s Lyrics and the &#039;Legend of Good Women&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Addresses issues of morality and moral perspectives by looking at the wording and structures within the CT, Chaucer&#039;s lyrics, and LGW.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265987">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Morality Ovidized: Sententiousness and the Aphoristic Moment in the &#039;Nun&#039;s Priest&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Compares the comic treatment of sententiousness in NPT with modern philosophical uses of aphorism.  Both are &quot;Menippean&quot; in their contrasts of high and low discourse, and both ask us to perceive their points rather than to understand conceptually.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266794">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Moralized Beasts: The Development of Medieval Fable and Bestiary, Particularly from the Twelfth Through the Fifteenth Centuries in England and France]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Fables present a worldlier view than do Christian bestiaries, and neither genre presented a worldview full enough for Chaucer or other writers. Fable became more Christian, developing witty moralization, sharply drawn personae, and more vivid style (shown in a wide variety of English and French writers).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268660">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[More &#039;Groping&#039; in The Summoner&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Although erotic and homosexual elements are undoubtedly evident in SumT, certain words and gestures, particularly the friar&#039;s ill-fated grope, do not unambiguously have the homosexual charge that has been claimed.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275339">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[More Chaucerian Ambiguities: A 652, 664, D 1346.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Uses lines from FrT 3.1325ff. to help clarify the punning ambiguity of the reference to &quot;pulling a finch&quot; in the GP description of the Summoner.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273201">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[More Manuscripts by the Beryn Scribe and His Cohort]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Identifies the Beryn Scribe as the scribe of Princeton University, MS 100, as well as other CT fragments. Maintains that the Beryn Scribe worked with other scribes in a scriptorium based in London to disseminate multiple  copies of vernacular literature.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266060">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[More Manuscripts Written by a Chaucer Scribe]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Two recently identified Trinity College manuscripts written by the &quot;Hammond&quot; scribe (who worked in London ca. 1460-85), a prolific copier of Chaucer, contain medical, scientific, and legal materials, indicating that this scribe included among his patrons members of the knightly and merchant classes.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271523">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[More on Blake&#039;s &#039;Auguries&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In the context of the biblical passages alluded to in a couplet evoking &quot;gem-encrusted plows,&quot; it is worth noting that in Blake&#039;s depiction of the Canterbury Pilgrims, &quot;he represented the Plowman as a medieval version of himself.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263106">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[More on Quaint and Quondam Words]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Some sexual connotation seems to attach to many &quot;qu-&quot; words in Chaucer, Shakespeare, and modern usage.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274501">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[More Puns in Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Help to show that punning (paronomasia) &quot;plays an important role in Chaucer&#039;s verse&quot; by identifying nine previously unremarked examples.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270594">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[More Short &amp; Shivery: Thirty Terrifying Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[An anthology of the editor&#039;s &quot;favorite scary tales,&quot; collected for a juvenile audience. Includes a modernized, simplified version of PardT, entitled &quot;Three Who Sought Death&quot; (pp. 75-77).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275561">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[More than Words Can Say: Late Medieval Affective Vocabularies.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores the semantic field of &quot;affectus&quot;/&quot;affeccioun&quot; in medieval Latin grammar, Chaucer (MilT and TC), Margery Kempe, and several devotional texts, clarifying its wide &quot;range of meanings and connotations . . . as a feeling category term,&quot; positive and negative, interior and exterior, secular and religious, semantic and performative.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274283">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Morphemic Structure of Chaucer&#039;s English.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes the morphemic structure of Chaucer&#039;s language, &quot;based only on the facts recorded in Chaucer&#039;s writing,&quot; without considering the work of his contemporaries or inferring data beyond extant forms in his works. Defines morphemes and their relations to words, outlines Chaucer&#039;s phonemics, his morphophonemics, his morphotactics (word-patterns), his derivational morphemes, and his inflexional morphemes.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>