<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261307">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Man, Men, and Woman in Chaucer&#039;s Poetry]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that &quot;Chaucer--drawing on a long tradition of Biblical commentary--is well aware of the sexual dimensions of word choice, even of the double meaning of &#039;man&#039;.&quot;  He &quot;plays on the relationship between naming and sexual differentiation&quot;;explores the ideology of &quot;courtly game-playing&quot;; and &quot;subjects all the conventional literary treatments of women by men . . . to a debunking examination of motive.  ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[  Fyler examines motifs and language in Mel, MLT, MerT, NPT, PhyT, FranT, WBP, SNT, ClT, KnT, MkT, ShT, SqT, TC, BD, LGW,PF, and Rom.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267075">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Man&#039;s Flesh and Woman&#039;s Spirit in the Decameron and the Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[CT and Boccaccio&#039;s Decameron depict a variety of social and moral transgressions committed by male characters; these transgressions constitute the ills of society. Female characters in the works are less likely to be transgressive, and only female characters are depicted as true saints.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261902">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Man&#039;s Free Will and the Poet&#039;s Choice: The Creation of Artistic Order in Chaucer&#039;s Knight&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer, possibly familiar with the concept of the &quot;poeta-theologus&quot; current in fourteenth-century Italian poetics, actually structures KnT &quot;in a fashion which parallels or imitates divine creation&quot;; perfection of structural order counters the imperfect philosophical formulations of the tale&#039;s protagonists.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276147">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Managing Death: Women&#039;s Networks of Private and Civic Responsibility in Medieval England.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chapter 2 discusses the Wife of Bath&#039;s &quot;unique approach to her fourth husband&#039;s death as she balances her postmortem responsibilities to him with her immediate remarriage,&#039; acting with &quot;concern&quot; while also &quot;tending to her own wishes.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264377">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manauscript Tanner 346: A Facsimile, Bodleian Library Oxford University]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Written by various hands in the fifteenth century, the Bodleian MS Tanner 346, the earliest of the Oxford Group, is indispensable in establishing the canon of the minor poems, especially Anel, Mars, Ven, and Pity.  In addition, it contains BD, PF, and LGW, as well as poems by Lydgate and Hoccleve.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Includes bibliography.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263544">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manciple no Ito ( Manciple&#039;s Intention )]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The narrator tells his tale from the social and political point of view.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In Japanese.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274444">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manipulation of Sources and the Meaning of the &quot;Manciple&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Investigates the &quot;active tension&quot; between the characterization of the Manciple and the nature of ManT, analyzing differences between the Tale and its sources and analogues (especially characterizations and moralizations) to show how Chaucer ironically undercuts his narrator&#039;s efforts to manipulate his audience.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270623">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manly and Rickert and the Failure of Method]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Critiques the Manly-Rickert text of CT for inconsistency in treatment of orthographic accidentals and failure to maintain a consistent, identifiable copy-text. Recommends, nevertheless, judicious use of the Manly-Rickert table of variants.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263348">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manly and Rickert&#039;s Collation of Huntington Library Chaucer Manuscripts HM 144 (Hn)]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Deals with Manly and Rickert&#039;s erroneous procedures and conclusions regarding classification of manuscripts, scribal procedures, the Ellesmere MS, the Cardigan MS, HM 144, and the order of the tales.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269494">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manmade Marvels in Medieval Culture and Literature]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considers classical and medieval attitudes toward automata and mirabilia as context for analyzing their presence and depictions in late medieval English culture, especially in works by Langland, Chaucer, Gower, and Mandeville. Chapter 2, &quot;Chaucer and the Culture of Commodified Mirabilia,&quot; is a revised version of an earlier essay on SqT and FranT (2001). Chapter 3, &quot;Chaucer&#039;s Body: The Subject of Technology,&quot; discusses how NPT and CYT examine the &quot;spiritual effects of manmade marvels on the human subject,&quot; also reflected in Form Age.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277137">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manuals for Penitents in Medieval English: From &quot;Ancrene Wisse&quot; to the &quot;Parson&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes and assesses the wide array of guides to penitential self-examination in late medieval Latin, Anglo-Norman, and Middle English, viewing them in the contexts of the 1215 Lateran Council, the rise in popular religion, and developing notions of subjectivity and identity. Includes a chapter on ParsT, &quot;&#039;To enden in som vertuous sentence&#039;: Concluding with Chaucer&#039;s Parson,&quot; which clarifies the orthodoxy of its general form and content, despite its lack of discussion of the Ten Commandments and the &quot;Pater noster.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268843">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manufacture in the Archive : Impingham&#039;s Chaucer in MS BL Harley 7333]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The proverbs signed &quot;Impingham&quot; in Harley 7333 derive from Chaucer, but the emphases and arrangement of the proverbs present a more reductive view of women than is found in Chaucer&#039;s works.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A revised version of this essay is in Crocker&#039;s &quot;Chaucer&#039;s Visions of Masculinity (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270632">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manuscript and Print: Books, Readers, and Writers]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Boffey describes the nature and circulation of Middle English poetic manuscripts and early printed editions, with recurrent comments on manuscript production and traces of readers&#039; responses. Draws examples from a wide variety of manuscripts and editions, including those of Chaucer&#039;s works.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264372">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manuscript Bodley 638: A Facsimile. Bodleian Library, Oxford University]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Written by various hands in the fifteenth century, Bodley 638,the latest of the so-called Oxford Group, contains HF and BD, found in only two other manuscripts, as well as Anel, LGW, PF, Pity, ABC, For, and Compl d&#039;Am.  Includes a bibliography.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A facsimile.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263346">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manuscript Pepys 2006: A Facsimile, Magdalene College, Cambridge]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The introduction treats contents, date, material and structure, ruling, layout and presentation of texts, handwriting, punctuation, correction and annotation, decoration, binding, and the history of the volume bequeathed to Magdalen College by Samuel Pepys. ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The first of the two manuscripts joined in the volume preserves texts of LGW, ABC, HF, Mars, Ven, For, PF, and several non-Chaucerian works.  The second manuscript is exclusively Chaucerian, with texts of Mel, ParsP, ParsT, Ret, Mars, Ven, Anel, For, Scog, ABC, Purse, Truth, and (the unique text) MercB.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264076">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manuscript Portraits of Chaucer and Hoccleve]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The eight manuscript portraits of Chaucer and the three of Hoccleve are described.  Those of Chaucer in Ellesmere and Harley 4866 are possibly independent copies of a common ancestor, now lost.  All other portraits of Chaucer depend on their tradition, except the &quot;Troilus&quot; &quot;pulpit portrait&quot; (Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, MS 61), which is an earlier, independent, and perhaps contemporary likeness.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270631">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manuscript Production Before Chaucer: Some Preliminary Observations]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Suggests that analysis of the physical makeup of manuscripts is a way to understand the production and use of Middle English texts. Focuses on the multilingualism in texts, the different functions of texts in a single book, and scribal output. Concludes that electronic resources are useful in reevaluating the manuscript production of the eleventh through the fourteenth centuries.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269730">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manuscript Studies, Literary Value, and the Object of Chaucer Studies]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Interrogates the &quot;ghost of judgment&quot; that haunts the study of Chaucerian manuscripts as well as formalist analysis of  Chaucer&#039;s works, commenting on implications for editing and teaching.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267482">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manuscript, Narrative, Lexicon : Essays on Literary and Cultural Transmission in Honor of Whitney F. Bolton]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Eleven essays by various authors, a bibliography of Bolton&#039;s publications, and an index. For four essays that pertain to Chaucer, search for Manuscript, Narrative, Lexicon under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274906">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manuscript.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses relations between the &quot;idealizing tendencies&quot; of formalist literary studies and the practicalities of studies in book history, reading PF as a &quot;Chaucerian theory of the book&quot; that is similar to the theory of Maurice Blanchot. Explores how a manicule at PF 518 in manuscript Oxford, Bodleian Library MS Bodley 638 (along with a pun on &quot;foule literature &quot; at PF 517) points the way to future study of &quot;the disruptive and changeful work that literature does in the world.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269106">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manuscripts and Audience]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The essay describes the &quot;complex exercises in historical reconstruction&quot; essential to bridge the distance between modern readers and Chaucer and his contemporary audience. Discusses Chaucer&#039;s literary production, his revisions, and scribal adaptations as evident in surviving manuscripts and references within the works themselves, contrasting modern presentations of Chaucer&#039;s works with the medieval perception of CT as unfinished and open-ended.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276853">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manuscripts and Early Printed Books of the &quot;Canterbury Tales.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines readings in CT manuscripts that are not found in most critical editions. Reviews history of textual criticism of CT up to the Riverside edition, with special reference to Ralph Hanna&#039;s scholarship. Considers merits of the electronic multilayered parallel texts developed by Nakao&#039;s research project team. In Japanese.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269113">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manuscripts and Ghosts : Essays on the Transmission of Medieval and Early Renaissance Literature]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reprints fifteen previously published essays by Scattergood, plus a sixteenth, original essay, &quot;The Copying of Medieval and Early Renaissance Manuscripts&quot; (pp. 21-82). The latter--which discusses the habits and status of medieval scribes, early printers, and attitudes among these conveyors of literature--comments on Chaucer and his transmission. Among the reprinted essays is Scattergood&#039;s &quot;The Jongleur, the Copyist, and the Printer: The Tradition of Chaucer&#039;s Wordes unto Adam, His Own Scriveyn.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272354">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manuscripts and Printed Books in Europe 1350-1550: Packaging, Presentation, and Consumption]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Foreward by Derek Pearsall. Essays address issues of packaging, presentation, and consumption of manuscripts. Also discusses producers, owners, and readers of manuscripts and early printed books. For two  essays that pertain to Chaucer, search for Manuscripts and Printed Books in Europe 1350-1550 under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270355">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Manuscripts and Readers in Fifteenth-Century England: The Literary Implications of Manuscript Study]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Nine essays, an Introduction, and Response derive from a 1981 Conference at the University of York. For the two essays that include substantial attention to Chaucer, search for Manuscripts and Readers in Fifteenth-Century England under Alternative Title. ]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>