<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264707">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hofisch-ritterlich Dichtung und sozialhistorische Realitat bei Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Medieval courtly literature must be seen as a reflection of the chivalric ideal.  The chivalric ideal in England was less integrated than on the Continent because it was the ideal of an alien Norman aristocracy.  Native English landowners were reluctant to become knights.  With the evolution of Parliament, they took the battle of knights of the shire, which connoted administrative not warlike activity.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s poetry shows tension between the ideals of chivalry and a pragmatic commonsense.  The confrontation with the chivalric ideal is implicit in BD.  In PF it becomes explicit in the contrast between chivalric excess and common sense.  The tragedy of TC results when Troilus&#039; chivalric idealism prevents him from behaving rationally.  CT presents various aspects of the confrontation between chivalry and common sense.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272188">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hofkritik im England des Mittelalters and der Renaissance]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys critiques of court culture in English writing from John of Salisbury to Edmund Spenser; includes discussion of (pp. 124-36) of NPT as a moral-satirical narrative.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276246">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hoi histories tou Kantermpery.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Item not seen. WorldCat record indicates this is a translation of CT into modern Greek.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277379">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Holding Company: Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Franklin&#039;s Tale&quot; in the &quot;Faerie Queene.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses Edmund Spenser&#039;s quotation of FranT, 764-66, in Britomart&#039;s speech in T&quot;he Faerie Queene,&quot; Book III, arguing that the Chaucerian material and its original context carry suggestions of the &quot;need for tolerance in social relations&quot; and &quot;[set] a standard for conduct&quot; for much of Spenser&#039;s poem.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267241">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Holding the Center: Chaucer&#039;s Book of Troilus and Dante&#039;s Commedia]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Relates the structure of TC (with Troilus&#039;s happiness reaching its apex at the numerical center of the poem) to structures found in Dante&#039;s &quot;Commedia&quot; (Divine Comedy) and to themes of fortune&#039;s changes in Boethius&#039;s &quot;Consolation of Philosophy.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267761">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Holy and Noble Beasts : Encounters with Animals in Medieval Literature]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A study of the representation of animals in late-medieval literature, focusing on how human identity is defined in relation to animals. Using examples from late-medieval hagiography and romance, Salter argues that medieval writers reflect on their own humanity and explore the meaning of abstract values and ideas through depictions of animals. Refers to WBPT, KnT, FranT, MkT and MLT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268188">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Holy Duplicity: The Preacher&#039;s Two Faces]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys the &quot;traditions of preaching theory that Chaucer drew on in creating his Parson and Pardoner,&quot; focusing on the preacher&#039;s paradoxical &quot;persona,&quot; the relationship between the &quot;person&quot; and the &quot;office,&quot; and the use of the physical body in the performance of spiritual truth. Chaucer&#039;s two preachers reflect the paradox in differing ways: the Pardoner&#039;s duplicitous single mindedness and the Parson&#039;s simple efforts to bridge the earthly/spiritual divide. Waters draws on preaching theories of Maurice of Sully, Humbert of Romans, Thomas of Chobham, and others.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265325">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Holy Erotic and the Virgin Word: Promiscuous Glossing in the &quot;Wife of Bath&#039;s Prologue.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Although the Wife of Bath is a character constructed from masculine discourse, she appropriates that discourse into her own autoerotic sexual/textual glossing.  In WBP, the Wife reveals an ambivalent feminine poetics within an apparently masculine discursive structure.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268040">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Holy Fear and Eloquence in the Age of Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores the link between fear of God and literary expression, usually manifested as &quot;overwhelming prolixity.&quot; Considers several of the tales in CT as part of this exploration.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268740">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Homoeroticism and Chivalry: Discourses of Male Same-Sex Desire in the Fourteenth Century]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines homoerotic acts between knights (kissing, expressions of love, and forming of lifelong bonds) in a variety of late medieval texts: &quot;Amys and Amylion,&quot; the &quot;Prose Lancelot,&quot; &quot;Sir Gawain and the Green Knight,&quot; the &quot;Stanzaic Morte Arthur,&quot; and TC.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Provides backgrounds on friendship from classical and medieval precedent and explores the sexual reputations of several medieval kings, including Edward II and Richard II. Considers how the friendship between Pandarus and Troilus in TC competes with the love of Troilus and Criseyde, channels homoerotic impulses, and is dramatized in &quot;sodomitical discourse.&quot; Also discusses the autoeroticism of Criseyde&#039;s gaze.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266867">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Homosociality and Creative Masculinity in the Knight&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines masculine suffering and Theseus&#039;s stoic masculinity, particularly how it demands the suffering of the ruler&#039;s soldiers and the sorrowing of women. Concludes that the Tale depicts Theseus&#039;s creative power as specifically masculine.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272008">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Honour in Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Defines the private and social aspects of &quot;honor&quot; in Chaucer&#039;s works, exploring its relations with related concepts such as &quot;worth,&quot; &quot;worship,&quot; shame, gentility, heritability, and, for women, chastity. Focuses on TC and FranT, but comments on these notions throughout Chaucer&#039;s corpus.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268558">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hooked-g Scribes and Takamiya Manuscripts]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Offers a &quot;new listing of the hooked-g group of scribes&quot; and attributes Takamiya MS 24 and two Takamiya fragments (MS 30 and single leaf from Plimpton MS) to the more specific &quot;slanted hooked-g scribe,&quot; also responsible for Cambridge, Trinity College R.3.3; Oxford, Bodleian Library, Lyell 31; London, Lambeth Palace Library MS 256; and other portions of the Plimpton MS. Other distinctive features include violet ruling and frame, large format, gothic minuscule headings and running titles, and an identifiable spelling system.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[2004]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262636">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hope Emily Allen and Medieval Religion: Feminism, Scholarship and Anglo-American Cultures]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines Allen&#039;s &quot;contribution to our knowledge of medieval feminism.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272255">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Horn and Ivory in the &#039;Summoner&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Exemplifies the &quot;allusive richness&quot; of SumT by explaining the references to horn and ivory (3.1741-42) which emphasize the falsity of the tablets of the Summoner&#039;s Friar.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262250">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Horoscopes and History]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Studies development (up to the 1500s) of seven modes of &quot;domification&quot;--i.e., the construction by mathematics of mundane houses used in horoscopes.  Includes applications through the seventeenth century.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275782">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Horse or Horses: A Chaucerian Textual Problem.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considering grammar, context, and manuscript evidence, argues that &quot;hors&quot; is singular in the GP description of the Knight (GP 1.74).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276121">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Horse-Riding Storytellers and Distributed Cognition in Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Canterbury Tales.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Exemplifies how the interactive and &quot;enactive&quot; process of reading details of the frame narrative of CT (GP and links between tales) prompts cognition in ways that are analogous to the &quot;distributed cognition&quot; of human sensorimotor operations. Focuses on how the riding styles of individual pilgrims (Knight, Yeoman, Squire, Monk, Summoner, and Host) and the ways they carry artifacts suggest movement, the perception of which is the fundamental operation of the brain.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269013">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Horticulture et orties : Le paradis contrarié du Parlement des oiseaux]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Posits that uncertainty and ambiguity are structuring stylistic techniques of Chaucer&#039;s descriptions in PF.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269308">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Host Desecration, Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Prioress&#039;s Tale,&#039; and Prague 1389]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Accusations of eucharistic host desecration in Prague in 1389 may be read as a backdrop for PrT. Stanbury summarizes the events of mob violence that led to a massacre of Jews.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267558">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[House Arrest : Modern Archives, Medieval Manuscripts]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Cultural and institutional practice has frequently estimated the status of Gower&#039;s poetry and the value of his manuscripts, not through assessment of his own achievements, but through his historical and literary proximity to Chaucer.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271256">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[House of Shadows: A Historical Mystery]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Historical fiction in a series of five &quot;interlinked mysteries&quot; that pertain to Bermondsey Priory and its curse.  The section titled &quot;Act Four,&quot; by Philip Gooden, &quot;relates to how the poet Chaucer becomes embroiled in the priory&#039;s dark history.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276069">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Household Knowledges in Late-Medieval England and France.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Focuses on a variety of late medieval households and argues that there is &quot;a dynamic and reciprocal relationship between domestic experience and its forms of cultural expression&quot; and cultural production. For an essay that pertains to Chaucer, search for Household Knowledges in Late-Medieval England and France in Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276469">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Household Reading for Londoners? Huntington Library MS. HM 140.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Includes discussion of the location and implications for readership of Chaucerian materials found among the fascicles of MS HM 140: ClT, Truth, and a selection from Anel.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276070">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Household Song in Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Manciple&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Focuses on &quot;household music&quot; and the &quot;intermingled melodies of birdsong and . . . musical instruments&quot; in ManT. Argues that ManT can be analyzed as a &quot;poignant record of the vibrant household world filled with music and song&quot; that is connected to Chaucer&#039;s longing for an &quot;alternative community after he left London.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>