<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277571">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower and Rime Royal.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Compares Gower&#039;s art and skill in using rhyme royal stanzas with Chaucer&#039;s, arguing that Chaucer&#039;s are superior and more flexibly adapted to narrative, largely because the &quot;fetters of the ballade stanza&quot; constrain Gower&#039;s dexterity. Originally published in Japanese: Gower and Rime Royal. Bulletin of College of General Education, Tohoku University 12 (1971), pp. 47-65.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274380">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower and Shakespeare in &quot;Pericles.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes &quot;the marked incongruity in the sheer quality of styles&quot; in Tho and Mel, commenting on them as &quot;burlesque,&quot; and using them to support an argument that Shakespeare intentionally employed mediocre, archaized poetry in the first two acts of &quot;Pericles.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267989">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower and Shakespeare in Pericles]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses &quot;incongruity in the sheer quality of style&quot; in Pericles, especially the Gower passages, suggesting that Shakespeare was inspired by Thopas--Chaucer&#039;s experiment in incongruity produced from the &quot;inferior art&quot; of an earlier tradition.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273420">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower and the Peasants&#039; Revolt.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses John Gower&#039;s &quot;Visio Anglie&quot; as a departure from his usual compositional style and from his other treatments of the Revolt. Argues that specific depictions carry out a mimetic reenactment of the Revolt, rejecting the notion that Chaucer&#039;s &quot;moral Gower&quot; (TC, V.1856) was wholly concerned with pedantry, and asserting that &quot;Visio Anglie&quot; fully realizes themes present in Gower&#039;s earlier work.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274024">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower before Chaucer: Narrative and Ethics in &quot;The Tale of Tereus.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comparative essay that includes commentary on Chaucer&#039;s &quot;volatile response&quot; to the story of Philomela in his LGW, suggesting that Chaucer&#039;s account may reflect anxiety about Gower&#039;s influence.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268553">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower in the Delamere Chaucer Manuscript]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Edwards comments on several features of Takamiya MS 32, which &quot;provides the only significant narrative conjunction of the works of Chaucer and Gower&quot;: quire numbering and arrangement of materials indicate that the Gower material was &quot;selected by the prospective purchaser&quot; and that the production of the manuscript was &quot;unsystematic.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[2004]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271674">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower saúda Chaucer em Português: um excerto do Livro do Amante (Palacio, Ms. II-3088)]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Item not seen; reported in Encomia 32-33 (2010-2011): 206, with an abstract in French by Isabel de Barros Dias.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262077">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower--Chaucer&#039;s Heir?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Dr. Johnson called Gower &quot;Chaucer&#039;s master.&quot;  But who is creditor and who is debtor?  The two poets allude to each other&#039;s work and appear to be mutually indebted; also, they share a large body of common stories, themes, and forms in their works.  Gower&#039;s late turning to English to &quot;speke...of love&quot; in &quot;Confessio Amantis&quot; is most significant evidence of Chaucer&#039;s influence on him.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269135">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower, Chaucer and the Art of Repentance in Robert Greene&#039;s &#039;Vision&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Greene uses Chaucer and Gower to represent licentious comedy and moral literature, respectively. In manipulating the debate between the medieval authors, Greene displays subtle awareness not only of his own literary persona but also of the authorial self-projections of Gower and Chaucer.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265172">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower, Chaucer, and French Prose Arthurian Romance]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Both Gower and Chaucer limit their use of Arthurian material to brief allusions, although Gower&#039;s allusions are more numerous, specific, and morally serious than are Chaucer&#039;s. Chaucer&#039;s allusions in WBT, PF, HF, LGW, SqT, Th, NPT, and Ros suggest that he cared little for Arthurian romance.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261243">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower, Chaucer, and Rhyme Royal]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In his rhyme-royal poetry, Gower adapted Chaucerian techniques as well as techniques from his own French seven-line poetry. Dean reviews Cinkante balades, Traitie pour essampler les amantz marietz, In Praise of Peace, and Amans&#039;s &quot;supplicacioun&quot; from Confessio Amatis 8.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276520">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower, Chaucer, and the &quot;Treuthe of Prestehode.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Compares Genius of Gower&#039;s &quot;Confessio Amantis&quot; with Chaucer&#039;s Parson of CT in order to disclose Gower&#039;s &quot;views concerning priests,&quot; arguing that both characters are idealized models of &quot;proper pastoral care&quot; and, perhaps, the result of conversations between the poets about the &quot;responsibilities<br />
of the secular clergy.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262343">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower, Chaucer, and the Classics: Back to the Textual Evidence]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines classical sources for HF, LGW.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274617">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower, Lydgate, and Incest.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that &quot;alone of the three &#039;fathers of English poesy [Chaucer, Gower, and Lydgate],&#039; Gower openly grapples with an acute awareness of the cultural centrality of a concept that extends from a betrayal of love&#039;s intimacy to social, political, and even poetic, dysfunction.&quot; Concludes that &quot;Gower&#039;s exploration of incest posed a problem that Chaucer felt impelled to address, and that Lydgate felt impelled to try to solve.&quot; In exploring the divergences between Gower and Chaucer, regards Gower&#039;s examination of incest as &quot;fuller and more searching,&quot; and Chaucer&#039;s treatment--as addressed in MLH, MLT, and ClT--as falling on the side of &quot;dominant repression.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267433">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower, Richard II, Henry of Derby, and the Business of Making Culture]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[English political poetry of the 1380s and 1390s was deeply marked by the self-image of the monarch, which shifted about the time of the Merciless Parliament (1388), as Richard II became more experienced and less playful. Chaucer&#039;s PF and revision of LGWP, Gower&#039;s rededication of &quot;Confessio Amantis,&quot; and Clanvowe&#039;s &quot;Boke of Cupide&quot; reflect the shift. Events of 1390-94 indicate John of Gaunt&#039;s efforts to establish a court culture through which his son, Henry of Derby, could claim a dynasty.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262867">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower&#039;s &#039;Honest Love&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Defends Gower&#039;s &quot;Confessio Amantis,&quot; with brief allusions to Chaucer&#039;s BD, ParsT, GP, and TC.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263476">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower&#039;s &#039;Tale of Florent&#039; and Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Wife of Bath&#039;s Tale&#039;: A Stylistic Comparison]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The two tales have a common ancestor, but the very different motives of the Confessor and of the Wife are reflected in the language texture.  Gower&#039;s style complements his vision of order and harmony; WBT is more vivid, dramatic, and suspensful.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274089">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower&#039;s &quot;Confessio Amantis&quot; and Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Canterbury Tales&quot; as &quot;Dits.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that CT and Gower&#039;s &quot;Confessio Amantis&quot; take the form of French &quot;dit&quot; poems. Claims that both works fit the genre because they have &quot;sufficient &#039;dit&#039;-like features.&quot; ]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270812">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower&#039;s Business: Artistic Production of Cultural Capital and the Tale of Florent]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[All of the recensions of the Prologue to &quot;Confessio Amantis&quot;--especially the Ricardian recension--reflect Gower&#039;s economic concerns. His Tale of Florent also engages commercial concerns, particularly those of marital contracts, although to a lesser extent than does Chaucer&#039;s WBT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266726">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower&#039;s Good Women: &#039;Confessio Amantis&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Compares the treatment of women in &quot;Confessio Amantis&quot; and LGW.  In each case, the frame of the poem and the male-authored perspective disallow true praise of women.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In Korean.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268906">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower&#039;s Monster]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Compares Nebuchadnezzar in Gower&#039;s &quot;Confessio Amantis&quot; with his depictions in Chaucer&#039;s HF and MkT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273832">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower&#039;s Narrative Art.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[  <br />
Assesses Gower&#039;s virtues and achievements as a narrative poet rather than as a moralist in &quot;Confessio Amantis,&quot; occasionally comparing and contrasting his techniques and accounts with analogous ones by Chaucer. Considers the frame of LGW to be inferior to Gower&#039;s in the &quot;Confessio,&quot; which &quot;released&quot; Gower&#039;s narrative potential, much as the frame of CT did for Chaucer. Prefers Gower&#039;s accounts of Thisbe, Lucrece, and Philomela to those in LGW, but gauges Gower&#039;s tale of Florent, though successful, to be less sophisticated than WBT. <br />
]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269416">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower&#039;s Quarrel with Chaucer, and the Origins of Bourgeois Didacticism in Fourteenth-Century London Poetry]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer and Gower compete in seeking to articulate political and moral ideals. Whereas Gower endorses &quot;communal governance of the ideology of self-interest,&quot; Chaucer explores a less certain &quot;ideal union&quot; among political, moral, and personal forms of absolutism. Galloway examines PhyT, the tale of Lucrece (LGW), and ManT in relation to their analogues in Gower&#039;s Confessio Amantis and discusses these medieval outlooks as adumbrations of theories of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270385">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower&#039;s Source Manuscript of Nicholas Trevet&#039;s &#039;Les Cronicles&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Tabulates correspondences between Gower&#039;s Tale of Constance (&quot;Confessio Amantis&quot; 2.587-1598) and available manuscripts of Trevet&#039;s Anglo-Norman original, seeking to identify Gower&#039;s source manuscript. Includes recurrent attention to Chaucer&#039;s MLT, its source manuscript, and the relations among the three versions of the Constance story.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273211">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower&#039;s Use of &#039;Rime Riche&#039; in &#039;Confessio Amantis&#039;--As Compared with His Practice in &#039;Mirour de L&#039;Omme&#039; and with the Case of Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Analyzes &quot;rime riche&quot; (identical rhyme) in Gower&#039;s poetry, focusing on the &quot;abundance&quot; of rime-riche couplets in &quot;Confessio Amantis,&quot; and discussing a number of points of comparison and contrast with Chaucer&#039;s practice in his verse. Revised version: Gower&#039;s Use of &quot;Rime Riche&quot; in &quot;Confessio Amantis.&quot; John Gower, The Medieval Poet (Tokyo: Shinozaki Shorin, 1976), pp. 214-31.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
