<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261725">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Frame and Fictive Voice in Chaucer&#039;s &#039;The Pardoner&#039;s Tale&#039; and Kipling&#039;s &#039;The King&#039;s Ankus&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Using the same folkloric motif as exemplum, Chaucer and Kipling conflate it with other motifs to form a new configuration; both embed the narrative in a series of fictive frames and modify it by commentary of multiple fictive voices.  A comparative approach enhances our appreciation of Chaucer&#039;s narrative strategies and illustrates a complexity and depth not previously recognized in Kipling.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266362">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Frames and Narrators in Chaucerian Poetry]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Attempts to define fifteenth-century &quot;Chaucerian poetry,&quot; commenting on the historical use of the term and positing several thematic and formal features, especially the &quot;meta-fictive and self-reflexive virtuosity&quot; that results from various kinds of framing techniques.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275501">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Framing Chaucer&#039;s Plowman.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that the scriptural glosses found in Thomas Godfray&#039;s 1535 publication of &quot;The Ploughman&#039;s Tale&quot; are similar to Langland&#039;s techniques in &quot;Piers Plowman,&quot; as are the &quot;poem&#039;s anticlericism and alliteration&quot;; when Godfray republished the tale in William Thynne&#039;s &quot;Works of Geoffrey Chaucer&quot;(2nd ed., 1542), new paratextual apparatus aligned the poem with CT. Each of these paratextual frames helps &quot;to protect the text from censors while cultivating the wide audience sought by financially savvy printers.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267845">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Framing Doctrine]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comments on literary framing structures in manuals of religious instruction and confession, from the &quot;Somme le Roi&quot; to ParsT. Briefly compares ParsT to &quot;Jacob&#039;s Well.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267785">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Framing Fiction with Death : &#039;The Seven Sages of Rome,&#039; Boccaccio&#039;s &#039;Decameron,&#039; and Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The &quot;Seven Sages,&quot; the &quot;Decameron,&quot; and CT share, in addition to frame structure and historical milieux, a concern with death and avoidance of it (plague), a changing sense of time, and a new concept of authorial identity (especially Chaucer). The forms encourage order and verisimilitude.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268404">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Framing Fiction with Death: Chaucer&#039;s Canterbury Tales and the Plague]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Late-medieval preoccupation with mortality defies the solace of fiction. PhyT and PardT offer no hope of physical or spiritual life, and ParsT kills storytelling.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267640">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Framing the Canterbury Pilgrims for the Aristocratic Readers of the Ellesmere Manuscript]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Ellesmere miniatures are evidence of the process of text production--the shaping and preparation of the manuscript for aristocratic viewing--and a visual guide to the reading process. The illustrations foster the aristocracy&#039;s sense of superiority and provide evidence for surmising the possible patron of the manuscript.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261312">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Framing the Canterbury Tales: Chaucer and the Medieval Frame Tradition]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In the traditions of Indian and Greek frame narratives, tensions exist between the framing story and the enclosed tales, although Western aesthetics promote tighter structure and more detailed characterization.  Medieval framed narratives florished as long as multiplicity and variety were admired.  Topics discusssed include CT, the Indian Panchatantra, Greek and Arabic aesthetics, Petrus Alphosi&#039;s Disciplina clericalis, and  works by Boccaccio, Don Juan Manuel, Gower, Sercambi, and Christine de Pizan.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[  Chapter six concentrates on how Chaucer suggests clear structure and design in CT and then blurs their outlines; CT retains feature of Arabic origins, especially openendedness and a variety of organizing elements.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268838">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Framing the Father : Chaucer and Virginia Woolf]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Virginia Woolf&#039;s discussions of Chaucer have &quot;the effect of cutting him down to size.&quot; This effect reflects her reaction to High Modernist affection for the Middle Ages and her &quot;subversive and anti-canonical approach to literary history.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277274">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Framing Value in Literature: Style and Ideology.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Item not seen. From the abstract: &quot;this study presents the frame as a strategic locus of value in the literary text, arguing that the frame both constitutes and is constituted by an interplay between stylistic &#039;insides&#039; and ideological &#039;outsides&#039;. . . . Chapter Three . . . culminates in readings of framed works by Boccaccio, Gower, and Chaucer. . . . [and later chapters explore] links between text and economies of value in the novel and in film  . . . . [as well as] the ideological resonances of literary framing and frame-breaking in the explicitly political context of recent South African fiction.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270647">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[France]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Butterfield reviews traditional, generally dismissive attitudes toward &quot;Frenchness&quot; in Chaucer criticism and advocates a new awareness of the linguistic complexity that underlies Chaucer&#039;s uses of French models and French diction, particularly the interpenetration of international dialects of French in England and on the Continent. Comments in detail on Chaucer&#039;s use of Froissart in the opening of BD and explores the multilingual--and multicultural--dimensions of puns in ShT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270688">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Frances Wolfreston&#039;s Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines the readers&#039; marks in an annotated copy of the 1550 Thynne edition of Chaucer&#039;s Workes (Folger STC 5074 Copy 2), identifying its century-long provenance (1578-1677) of female ownership and commenting on how notes, bracketed passages, and underlinings show that it may have been used to promote female virtuous living.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274257">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Franciplegius: Medieval and Linguistic Studies in Honor of Francis Peabody Magoun, Jr.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Includes 26 essays on Germanic, Old English, Middle English, and Renaissance literary and linguistic topics, along with a dedicatory poem, a brief Introduction, and a list of Magoun&#039;s publications between 1924 and 1964, including reviews. For two essays that pertain to Chaucer, search for Flanciplegius under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265916">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Francis Burton: Old Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Reeve&#039;s Tale&#039; &#039;Put into Better Englishe&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Identifies and edits from Bodleian Library MS Add. A.267 Francis Burton&#039;s version of RvT, in quatrains, from the early seventeenth century.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267697">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Franciscus Junius Reads Chaucer : But Why? and How?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Bremmer reviews the study of Chaucer undertaken late in life by the pioneering Dutch Anglo-Saxonist Franciscus Junius, as reflected mainly in copious marginalia in Junius&#039;s copy of Speght&#039;s 1598 edition of Chaucer&#039;s Works.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267432">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Fraternity and Danger: Imagining Male Community in Late Medieval England]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines the &quot;boundaries between licit and illicit forms of homosocial desire&quot; in communities in late-medieval England. Assesses various texts, including MkPT, FrT, and SumT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268101">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Frauen(körper) in der Patriarchalen Welt des Mittelalters: Chaucers Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[CT is startlingly antifeminist (&quot;erschreckend frauenfeindlich&quot;) in its depiction of women and of male attitudes toward women. Recent criticism has begun to recognize this antifeminism but has not fully overcome adulation of the author.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264169">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Fraunceys Petrak and the Logyk of Chaucer&#039;s Clerk]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Clerk responds to WBT using the poetry of Petrarch, the tale of Griselda, and a spiritually improved version of Aristotelian logic.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270344">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Frederick James Furnivall (1825-1910)]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Summarizes Furnivall&#039;s capacious contributions to Chaucer studies (and Middle English generally), and comments that his &quot;chief contributions&quot; to the editing of Chaucer lie in his &quot;selection of the texts&quot; to print and his care with copying, printing, and proofing, which resulted in important resources for later editors.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276545">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Freedom and Choice: Postnuptial Negotiation, the Flitch of Bacon Custom, and the Woe of Marriage in &quot;The Wife of Bath&#039;s Prologue and Tale&quot; and &quot;The Book of Margery Kempe.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores marital struggles and &quot;postnuptial renegotiation of marriage obligations&quot; in WBPT and &quot;The Book of Margery Kempe.&quot; Presents &quot;contemporary feminist theories of contracts, consent, and choice&quot; to reveal limitations of &quot;choice&quot; and negotiations for married couples in late medieval England.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268940">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Freedom and Necessity : History and Performance in the Clerk&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considers ClT in light of historical context, particularly the events of Richard II&#039;s marriage to Isabel of France.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268611">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Freedom from the Press: Reading and Writing in Late Medieval England]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines the works of Chaucer, Langland, and Margery Kempe in the context of the standardization of textual discourse that accompanied the development of printed books.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268514">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Freedom of Movement? Women Travellers in the Middle Ages]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Webb briefly cites two CT characters: the Prioress is an unusual, but not impossible, instance of a nun on a local (as opposed to a foreign) pilgrimage; the Wife of Bath parallels several historical women who capitalized on their peripatetic adventures.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265937">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Freedom Through Association? Chaucer&#039;s Psychology of Argumentation in &#039;The Wife of Bath&#039;s Prologue&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Associative thinking in WBP may have drawn on the model of Aristotelian psychology and argumentation as understood in Chaucer&#039;s day.  As a consequence, the Wife of Bath&#039;s voice remains more real to a modern audience than does the debate she represents.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266591">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Freedom Through Renunciation? Women&#039;s Voices, Women&#039;s Bodies and the Phallic Order]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The formel eagle in PF, Emily in KnT, and Margery Kempe seek to delay or renounce sexual activity.  The eagle&#039;s blush embodies her later request to delay a choice of mate; Emily&#039;s desire to remain unmarried is marked by her desire to reject the &quot;physical effects of heterosexuality.&quot;  In these works, as in Margery Kempe, female choice is constrained by masculine discourse.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>