<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261884">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Fortune, Nature, and Grace in Fragment C]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[That the Fortune-Nature-Grace topos is the unifying theme of Fragment C is supported by Chaucer&#039;s additions to its sources and by his probable revision of the link.  PhyT shows the gifts of Grace overcoming Fortune and Nature; PardT shows the abuse of all three.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263728">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Fortune&#039;s Chain of Love: Chaucer&#039;s Irony in Theseus&#039; Marriage Counselling]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The coherence problem in KnT can be solved by viewing the tale as Boethian, but Theseus ironically perverts Boethian arguments from &quot;De consolatione philosophiae&quot; until those arguments contradict Boethian philosophy, typically telling a familiar story but ironically twisting the ending.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276013">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Fortune&#039;s Friends: Forms and Figures of Friendship in the Chaucer Tradition.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines &quot;how Middle English writers appropriated different forms and figures of friendship in their discussions, critiques, and activations of friendship,&quot; describing modifications of classical, biblical, Boethian, and humanist models, with recurrent attention to Chaucerian works: KnT, For, Scog, and others.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265792">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Fortunes Stabilnes : Charles of Orleans&#039;s English Book of Love]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The introduction to this critical edition addresses cultural, historical, syntactic, and metrical aspects pertinent to Chaucer&#039;s works as well as to those of Charles of Orleans.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269542">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forty Years of Plague: Attitudes Toward Old Age in the Tales of Boccaccio and Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Youthful attitudes toward old age in the works of Boccaccio and Chaucer differ strikingly, perhaps because of demographic changes caused by the Black Plague. In Boccaccio, youth respects the wisdom of age, whereas in Chaucer young people resent the advice, authority, wealth, and existence of elders. KnT introduces the conflict between the generations, a motif throughout CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267529">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum : Many Aspects of Chaucer in English Literature]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses the reception history of Chaucer, ranging from Spenser through Shakespeare to the English Romantics. Panelists include Nahoko Miyamoto, Yoshiko Kobayashi, and Atsuhiko Hirota.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In Japanese.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262974">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum Reply to Esther C. Quinn]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Wife of Bath, a fiction rather than a person, slips into inconsistency because of the very problems Chaucer raises.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263202">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum Reply to Michael E. Moriarty]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Moriarty overemphasizes unity and logic at the expense of the varied traditions on which Chaucer drew.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263201">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum Response to Barbara Nolan&#039;s &quot;Chaucer&#039;s Voices&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Nolan fractures the unity of GP; a suitably deconstructive approach would consider all of the poet&#039;s voices, avoiding the the term &quot;voice&quot; altogether.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[See Nolan&#039;s &quot;Reply&quot; PMLA 101 (1986): 860-61.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263518">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum Response to Melvin Storm&#039;s &quot;The Pardoner&#039;s Invitation: Quaestor&#039;s Bag of Becket&#039;s Shrine?&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Pardoner&#039;s invitation is not a physical threat to the pilgrimage but a further sign of his propensity to profit from others and to compensate for his &quot;sexual difference.&quot; Storm&#039;s essay appeared in PMLA 97 (1982): 810-18.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263519">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum Response to Melvin Storm&#039;s &quot;The Pardoner&#039;s Invitation: Quaestor&#039;s Bag of Becket&#039;s Shrine?&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Pardoner&#039;s invitation is not an attempt to divert the pilgrims from their journey, and the Host&#039;s response is designed to restore the fellowship of the pilgrims, not to improve their spiritual well-being.  Storm&#039;s essay appeared in PMLA 97 (1982): 810-18.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263521">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum Response to Melvin Storm&#039;s &quot;The Pardoner&#039;s Invitation: Quaestor&#039;s Bag of Becket&#039;s Shrine?&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Storm does not distinguish between his own and Chaucer&#039;s attitudes toward the Pardoner&#039;s homosexuality.  Storm&#039;s essay appeared in PMLA 97 (1982): 810-18.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262978">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum Response to Susan Crane&#039;s &quot;Alison&#039;s Incapacity&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s strategy, rather than the Wife&#039;s incapacity, has warped conventional views of class, sex, and romance in WBT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263520">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum Response to William J. Hyde, Charles A. Owen, Jr., and Claude J. Summers]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Pardoner&#039;s self-revelation &quot;heightens the challenge&quot; of deceiving the pilgrims at the end of the sermon and does not preclude it.  Chaucer uses the Host&#039;s response to the Pardoner&#039;s invitation to point to the pilgrims&#039; spiritual weakness--even if the Host himself is unaware of the significance of his remarks.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Storm here replies to responses whioch also appear in PMLA 98 (1983).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270297">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum: &#039;Voice&#039; in the Canterbury Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[An exchange of letters in the PMLA Forum section that comment on textuality, narrative &quot;absence,&quot; narrative &quot;presence,&quot; and their usefulness in discussing &quot;voice&quot; in GP.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265166">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum: &quot;Early Chaucer Manuscripts&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Questions John H. Fisher&#039;s &quot;Language Policy for Lancastrain England&quot; (PMLA 107) on method of establishing Chaucerian texts.  See Fisher&#039;s &quot;Forum Reply.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265350">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum: &quot;The Medieval Kiss: Reply&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Since Chaucer does not describe the Pardoner&#039;s kiss, it could be either mouth-to-mouth or cheek-to-cheek; in either case, a public kiss signifies a sort of equality.  A reply to Ann Barbeau Gardiner PMLA 108 (1993): 333-34.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265352">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum: &quot;The Medieval Kiss&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Glenn Burger predicates a mouth-to-mouth kiss of Host and Pardoner, without evidence for such kisses between men.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A response to Glenn Burger, &quot;Kissing the Pardoner,&quot; PMLA 107 (1992): 1143-56.  See Burger&#039;s reply, PMLA 108 (1993): 334-35.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270277">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum: Chaucer Criticism]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[An exchange of letters in the PMLA Forum section, discussing the tone and details of Delasanta&#039;s essay, &quot;Penance and Poetry in &#039;The Canterbury Tales,&quot; published earlier in 1978 in PMLA.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270293">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum: Chaucer&#039;s Art]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[An exchange of letters in the PMLA Forum section letters that comment on the meaning of &quot;authority&quot; in the Middle Ages, particularly Chaucer&#039;s uses of the notion.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270440">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum: Closure in the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Forum letter in which Braxton, disagreeing with Pamela Michaela Paasche, claims that closure is evident in Chaucer&#039;s works when his male point of view is recognized, and presents MerT as a &quot;case in point.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270366">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum: Ordering the Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Exchange of letters in the Forum section of PMLA, disagreeing about the validity of the Ellesmere order of the CT and about the speaker of Chaucer&#039;s Ret.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265162">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum: Reply to Owen]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A reply to Owen&#039;s response to Fisher&#039;s &quot;Language Policy for Lancastrian England&quot; (PMLA 107).]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[All manuscripts of Chaucer&#039;s work postdate his death; no copy texts existed.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270329">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum: The Arabic Frame Tradition]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[An exchange of letters in the PMLA Forum section that comment on openendedness and closure in CT and the influence of Arabic literary models on Chaucer.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272016">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Forum: The Man of Law&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Responds to K. J. Hughes&#039; forum letter about the artistic and dramatic qualities of MLT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>