<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265193">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Differentiating Chaucer and Lydgate: Some Preliminary Observations]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Summarizes questions of Lydgate&#039;s canon and its relation to Chaucerian apocrypha.  Describes a series of computer-assisted stylistic analyses used to clarify the canon, showing that Lydgate tends to use &quot;large and complex syntactic structures&quot; and &quot;certain characteristic words and phrases.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277442">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Difficult Pasts: Post-Reformation Memory and the Medieval Romance.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Studies post-Reformation understandings and treatments of romance--a &quot;fluid&quot; genre--for the ways they disclose &quot;subtle continuity&quot; across the traditional divide between medieval and Renaissance. Focuses on resistance to erasure of the genre, analyzing the presence and roles of romance in catalogues, collections or collages, literary monumentalization, and metaphoric museums of memory. Comments on spurious attributions to Chaucer and investigates aspects of Edmund Spenser&#039;s and John Lane&#039;s monumentalization/laureation of their predecessor in continuations of SqT and elsewhere.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274567">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Digital &quot;Mouvance&quot;: Once and Future Medieval Poetry Remediated in the Modern World.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Attends to histories of reinterpretation and translation of medieval poetry of Chaucer and of &quot;Sir Gawain and the Green Knight.&quot; Focuses on the return to medievalism<br />
by British poets of the twenty-first century, including Seamus Heaney. Also notes &quot;Sir Gawain and the Green Knight&quot; on Twitter.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276095">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Digital Humanities as Anamorphosis.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Situates the digital humanities (DH) within media history by arguing that DH depends upon collocation of visual, perspectivistic technology and artistic pursuit, as does anamorphosis. Exemplifies anamorphosis by means of Hans Holbein&#039;s &quot;The Ambassadors&quot; and comments on Palamon&#039;s and Arcite&#039;s &quot;circuits of desire&quot; in viewing Emelye in KnT and on the retrospective articulation and skewing of courtly love in BD.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266343">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Digital Imaging and the Manuscripts of &#039;The Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that digital imaging of all available reproductions of CT manuscripts is necessary to make a pictorial history of the manuscripts.  Reproductions of Hengwrt show changes over time.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277004">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Digitizing &quot;Studies in the Age of Chaucer.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes the history of digitizing the journal SAC, commenting on the future of print journals and &quot;the overall impact of digitization on scholarly societies.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261650">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Dilation, Design, and Didacticism in Troilus and Criseyde]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considers TC as a narrative poem in relation to Boccaccio&#039;s Filostrato, exploring three narrative &quot;designs&quot; highlighted by the comparison:  additive, goal-resistent dilation; patterned, goal-determining organization; and revisionary interpretation in the ending.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268284">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Dimensions of Judgment in the Canterbury Tales: Friar, Summoner, Pardoner, Wife of Bath]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Wycliffite elements of SumT and of the GP description of the Friar are submerged, but Chaucer sympathized with Wycliffite thought and believed that the Summoner&#039;s friar was damned. Borroff surveys anti-fraternal tradition, comments on Fals-Semblant of Roman de la Rose as a source of Chaucer&#039;s Friar Hubert and Friar John (and of Chaucer&#039;s Pardoner), and notes Wycliffite elements both in WBP (helping to unify Part 3 of CT) and in the GP description of the Parson.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266939">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Diminishing Masculinity in Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Tale of Sir Thopas&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[One of the dominant themes of fragment 7 of CT is the &quot;gendering of male bodies.&quot; The theme plays out through the shrinking masculinity ofThopas and the absence of menacing sexuality in his encounter with Olifaunt. It parallels the diminution of masculine threat in Chaucer&#039;s fictional accounts of rape and in the accusation of rape against Chaucer himself.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263454">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Dinamica social en &quot;The Canterbury Tales&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Point of view in the structure of CT and the use of direct speech and dialogue are a consequence of Chaucer&#039;s interest in showing the contradictions in his environment without the mediating influence of an omniscient narrator.  The open structure of CT invites questions about the aim of the work as a social and literary product.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265578">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Diologism, Heteroglossia, and Late Medieval Translation]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines Gavin Douglas&#039;s &quot;Eneados&quot; as a work in which Mikhail Bakhtin&#039;s notions of diologism and heteroglossia help illuminate medieval translation practice.  Encourages application of such an approach to medieval translators, including Chaucer.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262008">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Diomed, the Large Tongued Greek]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[That Diomed was indeed &quot;of tonge large&quot; is to be evinced from his conversations with Criseyde in Book V.  His large tongue becomes a symbol of the eventuality of Criseyde&#039;s infidelity and of Troilus&#039; tragic demise, as well as of the inevitability of a Greek victory at Troy.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265464">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Dirc Potter, a Medieval Ovid]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Dutch writer Potter (d. 1428) followed a career similar to Chaucer&#039;s and also translated the Old French &quot;Melibee.&quot;  Van Buuren discusses Gower&#039;s and Chaucer&#039;s uses of Ovid and analyzes Potter&#039;s &quot;Der minnen loep&quot; (&quot;The Course of Love&quot;) for its use of Ovid&#039;s &quot;Heroides&quot; and medieval commentaries.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270729">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Disability in the Middle Ages: Reconsiderations and Reverberations]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Fourteen essays by various authors on topics ranging from Old English and Icelandic sagas to early modern Spanish literature and Shakespeare&#039;s &quot;Richard III.&quot; The volume includes an introduction by the editor, an index, and a cumulative bibliography. For three essays that pertain to Chaucer, search for Disability in the Middle Ages under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276994">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Disability, Music, and Chaucer&#039;s Advental Bodies.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that Chaucer &quot;experiments with the body-disabling power of music as a site of poetic potential,&quot; tallying how, in CT, &quot;musical performance nearly always causes narrative tension&quot; and music &quot;prosthetizes disability&quot;--&quot;advental&quot;  insofar as it is &quot;promised but always in a state of deferral.&quot;  Examines how &quot;sonic bodies inhabit crip asynchronies for purposes of poesis&quot; in the &quot;body of Echo&quot; in FranT, the &quot;lyric I&quot; in For, BD as a poem, and Troilus&#039;s body in TC.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274730">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Disability.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores how disability studies have expanded to include consideration of relations between &quot;embodiment and literary form,&quot; focusing on representations of deafness in the fifteenth-century Castilian &quot;Arboleda de los enfermos&quot; (Grove of the Infirm) of Teresa de Castagena, but including discussion of John Gower&#039;s autobiographical concern with blindness, Chaucer&#039;s depictions of bodily affliction in MkT (emphasizing stylistic concerns), Margery Kempe&#039;s &quot;chronic illness or mental disability,&quot; and William Shakespeare&#039;s treatment of physical deformation in &quot;Richard III.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266893">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Disappearing Fairies in the Wife of Bath&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In WBT, the first mention of fairies--the Wife&#039;s lament for their disappearance--is linked to and introduces the other fairy scenes. The knight&#039;s experience demonstrates that even in her first mention of fairies the Wife associates them with happiness, sexual satisfaction, and education--notions supported by numerous medieval ballads and romances.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265898">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Disarming Women: Gender and Poetic Authority from the &#039;Thebaid&#039; to the &#039;Knight&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Women furnish the &quot;crucial means&quot; for authors to adapt the Theban tradition to their own poetic vision.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[  Statius shows women as criticizing epic history; the &quot;Roman de Thebes,&quot; Dante&#039;s &quot;Purgatorio,&quot; and Boccaccio&#039;s &quot;Teseida&quot; impose differing emphases; and KnT, more nearly like the epic history of Statius, shows women as sustaining losses and sacrifices.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276228">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Disciplining the Heart: Lovesickness in Medieval Literature.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Addresses lovesickness in TC, John Gower&#039;s &quot;Confessio Amantis,&quot; and &quot;The Book of Margery Kempe,&quot; considering it &quot;as an embodied and thus imminent process that organizes relationships around culturally defined ideas of either negotiation and mutuality or hierarchy,&quot; a trope useful &quot;to think through larger ideas about the relationships of the sexes, of one individual to another, of the individual to society, and of the individual to the divine.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277260">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Disciplining the Tongue: Speech and Emotion in Later Middle English Poetry.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores speech in late medieval English &quot;literature and prescriptive religious writing,&quot; focusing on how &quot;inward feelings [are] realized only in intersubjective exchange.&quot; Includes discussion of, among others, &quot;Piers Plowman,&quot; &quot;Mum and the Sothsegger,&quot; and CT, In the latter, &quot;Chaucer makes mirth, comfort, and pleasure––words that elsewhere describe the act of prayer––the emotional norm that governs the telling of the Canterbury Tales: sacred pleasure becomes the pleasure of idle fiction.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271833">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Disconsolate Art]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Rejects conventional readings of BD as a demonstration that art can transcend suffering; instead shows how BD &quot;enacts . . . a disconsolate poetics, in which pain and suffering perdure.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266980">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Discourse and Community in the Late Fourteenth Century]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Systemetic functional analysis of TC, exploring how Chaucer seeks to change or improve his community&#039;s views on love.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265897">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Discourse and Dominion in the Fourteenth Century: Oral Contexts of Writing in Philosophy, Politics, and Poetry]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines the ways oral tradition continues to influence writing in late-medieval literature, considering works of Ockham and Wyclif, chronicles of the reigns of Edward III and Richard II, &quot;Sir Gawain and the Green Knight,&quot; and KnT.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[ In KnT, Chaucer poses relations between political domination and metalinguistic discourse, issues important during the minority of Richard II.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The conflict between spoken and written modes in KnT is self-reflexive, and it critiques contemporary political dominion in which power resulted from the displacement of voice.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262555">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Discourse and Narration in Chretien&#039;s &#039;Yvain&#039; and Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Troilus&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Shakif-Ghaly scrutinizes &quot;Yvain&quot; and TC for medieval &quot;dispositio&quot; through Genettian narratology and for &quot;manifestatio&quot; through Anglo-American theory.  Despite differences between the texts, such an analysis brings out tensions of medieval authors and suggests the development of a &quot;medieval narratology.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265607">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Discourse and the Problem of Closure in the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[CT &quot;shows a surprising array&quot; of ways in which Chaucer &quot;ignores, skirts, transcends, or even anticipates structural closure,&quot; engaging his readers in the &quot;dialogic processes of discourse itself.&quot;  Surveys techniques of openendedness in CT, arguing that they result fom Chaucer&#039;s imitations of oral tradition and that they suggest we read the work as a &quot;drama of the reception of discourse&quot; and an assertion of an open epistemology.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
