<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264014">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Conversational Noncooperation: The Case of Chaucer&#039;s Pardoner]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In his shameless self-revelation the Pardoner confuses and angers his audience by mixing boasting and confiding with their contrary expectations of approval and mitigated disapproval.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269524">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Convocational and Compilational Play in Medieval London Literary Culture]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Bahr explores parallels between manuscripts as compilations and groups of people as affinities in late medieval London. Chaucer in CT and Gower in Confessio Amantis differ in how they conceive of literary and social organization.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261490">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Copy-Text and Its Variants in Some Recent Chaucer Editions]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines the use and misuse of W. W. Greg&#039;s term &quot;copy-text&quot; in recent editions of Chaucer and in the Kane-Donaldson Piers Plowman.  Confusions among &quot;copy-text,&quot; &quot;base text,&quot; and &quot;best text&quot; will be alleviated only when editors use the terms accurately and consistently.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269322">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Copying and Conflation in Geoffrey Chaucer&#039;s Treatise on the Astrolabe: A Stemmatic Analysis Using Phylogenetic Software]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Applies a technique from evolutionary biology - phylogenetic &quot;neighborhood-joining&quot; - to the witnesses to the text of Astr to produce a stemma, test the fragments and sections of longer versions against the stemma, and discuss the scribal conflation of various versions in their own productions. Concludes by commenting on scribes&#039; concern with completeness of the text.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276472">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Copying and Reading &quot;The Prick of Conscience&quot; in Late Medieval England]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses medieval scribal transmission and commercial book production in relation to the surviving copy of &quot;The Tale of Beryn&quot; and the &quot;Beryn-Scribe.&quot; Examines the reception and transmission of the &quot;Prick of Conscience&quot; in late medieval England. References Chaucer throughout, with specific connections with CT and TC.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263640">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Corn and Shrimps: Chaucer&#039;s Mockery of Religious Controversy]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Treats themes of predestination, Lollardy, and priestly celibacy in CT and TC.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264253">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Corporeal and Spiritual Homocide, the Sin of Wrath, and the &#039;Parson&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses the canon-law tradition and the sources of ParsT 565-69 but concludes that &quot;the question of Chaucer&#039;s learning on this subject...must remain unanswered.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269607">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Corpses and Cogitos and the Sympathetic Self: Exhuming Sovereignty and Its Sympathetic Subjects]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In a larger investigation of the philosophical concept of sympathy, Lopez discusses the lack of sympathy, both personal and spatiotemporal, between May and January in MerT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265997">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Corpus chaucerien et corporelite des vertus. Le MS Cambridge Gg 4.27(1)]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Although the manuscript is a typical instance of &quot;compilatio&quot; and unification (e.g., punctuation of ParsT), the virtues portrayed to illustrate ParsT do not belong to a typical iconographic program.  After identifying the three virtues with two saints (Charite and Abstinence with Elizabeth, Chastete with Margaret), Bourgne re-evaluates the possible provenance of the Chaucerian collection, arguing in favour of a tie with Jacqueline de Hainaut.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269729">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Corrected Mistakes in Cambridge University Library MS Gg.4.27]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Kato assesses the accuracy of the text of CT that appears in Cambridge University Library MS Gg.4.27. Quantifies and categorizes the scribe&#039;s errors, paying particular attention to the mistakes that the scribe himself corrected.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267548">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Corrective Notes on the Structures and Paper Stocks of Four Manuscripts Containing Extracts from Chaucer&#039;s Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Proposes quire structures for four paper manuscripts, focusing on watermarks and commenting on implications of the proposed structures. Assesses British Library MS Arundel 140 (Ar); British Library MS Harley 2382 (Hl3); Magdalene College, Cambridge MS Pepys 2006 (Pp); and British Library MS Sloane 1009 (Sl3).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272431">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Correspondencia de Prominencia en las Canciones Inglesas. Una Perspectiva Histórica]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Diachronic study of how the linguistic stress matches metrical strong positions in spoken poetry and songs of the Middle and early modern English periods, including discussion of Chaucer&#039;s works. Prominent mismatches are more frequent in earlier songs because of phonological, rather than metrical, factors.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263962">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Cosmic Allegory and Cosmic Error in the Frame of &#039;The Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[From opening sign of Aries to closing sign of Libra, the pilgrimage moves between the termini of Creation and Doomsday, using symbolism of spring and autumn in the day&#039;s cycle.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265903">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Cosmic Law and Literary Character in Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Knight&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[KnT &quot;participates in a tradition antagonistic to the new nominalism, &quot;based on a &quot;scientific ontology consonant with Boethianism&quot; and understandable in light of the truth-theories of Albumasar, Robert Grosseteste, and John Wyclif.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263207">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Cosmology, Contrariety and the &#039;Knight&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses the &quot;contrarious juxtaposition&quot; in KnT design as a factor in determinacy.  At work in KnT, the familiar medieval &quot;topos&quot; of &quot;concordia discors&quot; and marriage as a mediating device are examined in light of symbol, imagery, and wordplay with reference to Bernardus Silvestris, Boethius, and Alanus de Insulis.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275454">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Cosmopolitan Imaginaries.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses the presence of cosmopolitan thinking in medieval literature, drawing examples from Fulcher of Chartres&#039; &quot;Historia Hierosolymitana,&quot; TC, and the medieval Troy story at large. In Chaucer&#039;s poem, Criseyde discovers through Diomedes&#039; amorous advances in the Greek camp that the &quot;cosmopolite . . . operates among strangers as a stranger in order to confirm her place in the cultural system they share&quot;--i.e., the &quot;chivalric-Ovidian world structured by love&quot; that is common to Trojans and Greeks alike.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270904">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Cosmopolitanism and Medievalism]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores international cultural exchange and openness in the Middle Ages, commenting on scenarios of medieval cosmopolitanism in three modern fictions: Youssef Chahine&#039;s film &quot;Destiny,&quot; Tariq Ali&#039;s novel &quot;Shadows of the Pomegranate Tree,&quot; and Milorad Pavic&#039;s metafictional &quot;Dictionary of the Khazars.&quot; Finding both cosmopolitanism and anticosmopolitanism in TC, Ganim distinguishes between cosmopolitanism and worldliness in the character of Pandarus. He also comments on works by John Gower and on &quot;Mandeville&#039;s Travels.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272409">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Costume Comedy: Sir Thopas&#039;s &#039;Courtly&#039; Dress]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Alone among Chaucer&#039;s knights, Thopas receives a full costume description, but it defies readers&#039; expectations of a top-to-toe effictio. Th also juxtaposes cheap and costly materials, mentions unattractive colors, and omits expected details, all for comic effect. These costume details would be emphasized in oral performance.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265899">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Costume Rhetoric in the Knight&#039;s Portrait: Chaucer&#039;s Every-Knight and his Bismotered Gypon]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The multilayered details of the Knight&#039;s clothing represent both a realistic and a symbolic knight, whose profession of chivalry in the fourteenth century was far from ideal.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[  Chaucer&#039;s choice of conflicting particulars complicates the portrait of this pilgrim.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272402">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Costumes, Props, Role-Playing, Active Learning: Performative Pedagogy in the Medieval Studies Classroom]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Oral performance of ambiguous lines can illustrate their various possible meanings. Emphasizes how recordings and online materials can supplement student reading and performance, and how films can help readers visualize key moments. Costumes, props, and role-plays also enliven Chaucer and medieval literature for students.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261819">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Could Chaucer Spell?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[By intention Chaucer like Shakespeare was a phonetic speller, so that manuscript variations in spelling provide clues to his metrics.  The text of the LGW Prologue in MS. Gg of the Cambridge University Library is perhaps the nearest to Chaucer&#039;s spelling we can get.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274782">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Counterfeit Correspondences: Documentary Manipulations and Textual Consciousness in Gloucester&#039;s &quot;Confession&quot; and &quot;The Man of Law&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores Chaucer&#039;s reservations about the reliability of written documents by examining Donegild&#039;s counterfeit letters in MLT and Thomas Woodstock, duke of Gloucester&#039;s &quot;Confession&quot;, written in 1397. Examines problems of written documents implicated in both narratives, such as &quot;documentary manipulations, fears of inception, and suspicions of forgery.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264717">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Counterfeiting Chaucer: The Case of &#039;Dido,&#039; Wyatt, and the &#039;Retraction&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The &quot;Letter of Dido to Aeneas&quot; in Pynson&#039;s &quot;Chaucer&quot; (1526), omitted by Thynne (1532), inspired Wyatt to write &quot;Lyke as the swan...&quot;; for him Chaucer was Pynson&#039;s edition.  Thynne&#039;s omission of Ret was not remedied until Urry (1721).  Modern editions conceal what readers believed for four centuries to be Chaucerian.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271097">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Counting at Dusk (Why Poetry Matters When the Century Ends)]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores why the world is &quot;newly alert to its need for poetry&quot; at the end of each century, including comments on Chaucer&#039;s writing of CT at the end of the fourteenth.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268311">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Coupling the Beastly Bride and the Hunter Hunted: What Lies Behind Chaucer&#039;s Wife of Bath&#039;s Tale?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s WBT destabilizes gender roles rather than focusing on the issues of kingship at the core of most of the loathly-lady tales. WBT engages issues of personal power politics as it creates a lively, garrulous character, but the moral lies in the collapse of gender roles and the acceptance of ambivalence.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>