<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265589">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Names]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s use of the name Geffrey in his poetry contains a humorous and self-reflexive impact, although reference to his ancestral name Malyn does not.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273788">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Narrative Art in &quot;The Canterbury Tales.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes Chaucer&#039;s rhetoric and style in CT, exploring his orchestration of narrative economy, climax, pace (especially in relation to rhyme and meter), and verisimilitude, Identifies &quot;flaws&quot; in SumT and PhyT, and admires the symbolic characterizations of KnT, MilT as farce, MerT as arch irony, and ManT as a critique of court. Also comments on Chaucer&#039;s extensive use the &quot;Possessive Demonstrative&quot; (e.g., &quot;this Palamon&quot;) as a device for engaging his audience.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266158">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Narrative Game]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considers the backgrounds and narrative structures of Chaucer&#039;s comic tales.  Chaucer&#039;s fabliaux are less serious than are their sources and analogues, although some of the resemblances are disturbing. In Japanese.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273745">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Narrative Pose: The Formative Phase.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Studies Chaucer&#039;s narrative personae in BD and PF, identifying several traits that become &quot;regular marks&quot; of his later self-characterizations: a bookish reteller who interjects personal comments, &quot;comic self-depreciation,&quot; and ambiguous &quot;fascination&quot; with love but without personal involvement.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265893">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Narrative Typology on the &#039;General Prologue&#039; to the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Analyzes the rhetorical shift between the third-person presentational voice of the first eighteen lines of GP and the following first-person voice of the involved narrator. The passage exploits a new paradigm of narration and validates the theories of Saussure and Genette. In Japanese, with English abstract.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265902">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Narrative Voice in &quot;The Knight&#039;s Tale&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Emphasizes the stylistic and rhetorical innovation of Chaucer&#039;s narrative voice, arguing that it can be perceived behind his various narrators and implied authors.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[  Comparing and contrasting the voice of KnT with that of Chaucer&#039;s other works and those of contemporary romances, Klitgard examines how Chaucer achieves a paradoxical distance from and closeness to his material in KnT and leaves the poem without thematic resolution.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[  Chaucer&#039;s voice can be perceived despite the various and shifting registers and narrative postures of KnT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266733">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Narrative Voice in the &#039;House of Fame&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer writes in a &quot;highly literate cultural code of poetry,&quot; which reveals the evolving persona of the poet.  It is possible that he read HF aloud in installments and that the original ending--reflecting, no doubt, some crisis at court--was subsequently lost.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263814">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Narrator and Criseyde]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The narrator makes the reader see Criseyde from Troilus&#039;s point of view.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263143">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Narrator: &#039;Troilus and Criseyde&#039; and the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Chaucerian narrator &quot;directs our responses and controls the narrative situation&quot; but does not give definite answers. The narrators of BD, HF, PF, and LGW are not necessarily representative of Chaucer himself.  The ever-present narrator of TC forces the audience to participate empathetically and creatively.  The narrators of CT never let us forget that they are storytellers.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263140">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Narrators]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Aware of the insights into author-audience relationship provided for &quot;written&quot; texts by structuralism and poststructuralism, Lawton concentrates on oral aspects in Chaucer.  Emphasizing the complexity of tone in interacting voices, Lawton studies PardP, PardT, SqT, PF, LGW, BD, TC, and CT. ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[He challenges dramatic and psychological interpretations that see tales as extensions of the GP portraits and examines Chaucer&#039;s sources and influences (especially &quot;Roman de la Rose&quot;) for models for his tonal plurality.  Traces developments in the narrator&#039;s voice from dream visions to CT.  In BD, the dreamer rather than the Black Knight undergoes psychological change.  Studies the critical reception of SqT; rejects the TC narrator as a character in the poem.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268918">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Narrators and Audiences : Self-Deprecating Discourse in Book of the Duchess and House of Fame]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer constructed a self-deprecating narrator in BD and in HF in response to audience expectations. These constructions, in turn, shaped how people in Chaucer&#039;s own society regarded Chaucer and how his personality has been recorded historically.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269809">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Narrators and the Rhetoric of Self-Representation]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Foster revisits the question of Chaucer&#039;s narrator as a fictional construct, gauging responses that the verisimilitude of Chaucer&#039;s narrative might have invited in a contemporary audience. In WBP, Jankyn&#039;s actions as a reader comment on Chaucer&#039;s narrator and his literary and scholarly competence. In the dream visions, the narrators&#039; attitudes toward reading create a Chaucer-like persona who relies on authority rather than experience (HF), who is emotionally limited (PF), and who has a textual relationship with Love (LGWP). TC contrasts the communal experience of an aural audience with the experience of a silent, solitary reader.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263427">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Native Heritage]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Treats alliteration, enjambment, repetition, oral style, etc.,to demonstrate that Chaucer&#039;s poetry represents &quot;not so much...the beginning of a new tradition...as the culmination of a native poetic tradition,&quot; especially as found in early Middle English lyrics.  Discusses KnT, CT, TC, HF, MilT, Rom.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272047">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Native Heritage]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Compares several of Chaucer&#039;s works (ABC, Bukton, and sections from LGW, TC, and CT) with their sources and analogues to clarify Chaucer&#039;s dependence upon the English literary tradition.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265402">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Natura in &#039;The Parliament of Fowls&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines the relations between Chaucer&#039;s figures of Nature in PF and Alain de Lille&#039;s &quot;De planctu natura,&quot; considering several notions derived from Alain:  &quot;multiplex,&quot; &quot;deficiens,&quot; &quot;mutablile,&quot; and &quot;concordia discors.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In Japanese.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264287">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Neglected Prose]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Neglected through modern predilections that ignore the intellectual milieu of the fourteenth century, Chaucer&#039;s prose works deserve more enlightened attention.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275033">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Neoplatonism: Varieties of Love, Friendship, and Community. ]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores examples of &quot;friendship, felicity or joy, love, fellowship, and &#039;compaignye&#039; (company, companionship, community)&quot; in Chaucer&#039;s works through a Neoplatonic lens. Focuses on &quot;Chaucer&#039;s Boethianism&quot; by offering perspectives on Chaucer&#039;s own philosophical search for truth in his works. Emphasizes how his reliance on Boethius&#039;s &quot;Consolation of Philosophy&quot; helped to shape Chaucer&#039;s philosophy and characters in CT, TC, and LGWP.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269439">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s New Ekphrasis]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Bourgne studies the links between architecture and Chaucer&#039;s transposition (&quot;his new ekphrasis&quot;) into literary compositions.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265006">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Nicholas and Saint Nicholas]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s character parodies the saint in a number of persuasively explicit details.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276743">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Nightingales.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considers Chaucer&#039;s uses of bird imagery in TC, contrasting them at many points with other, more anthropocentric literary birds, and generally commending his bird (and animal) imagery for its rhetorical range and evocation of precise emotion.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275497">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Non-Debt to Langland.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reviews critical studies that offer, accept, or defend arguments that Chaucer knew and was influenced by William Langland&#039;s &quot;Piers Plowman,&quot; challenging them on the grounds of weak logic, uncertain assumptions, lack of evidence, and/or the commonplace or spurious nature of claimed connections.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262351">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Non-Involvement in &#039;Pyramus and Thisbe&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Refutes the view that Shakespeare used the Legend of Thisbe or Th in writing his &quot;Midsummer Night&#039;s Dream.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263976">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Norfolk Reeve]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Norfolk origin of the Reeve provides a &quot;ready-made expectation of avarice.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Revised in Alan J. Fletcher, Preaching, Politics, and Poetry in Late-Medieval England (Dublin: Four Courts, 1998).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268085">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Norfolk Reeve]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In RvT, Chaucer&#039;s &quot;treatment of the Northern dialect&quot; is fairly consistent, but the Reeve&#039;s dialect includes &quot;distinctive features characteristic of the Norfolk dialect.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270824">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Novelized, Carnivalized Exemplum: A Bakhtinian Reading of the Friar&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Through its &quot;metafictional dialogue&quot; between the teller and pilgrim narrator; its &quot;inter-illumination&quot; of genres, including anticlerical satire, oath making, and fabliau; and its depiction of a &quot;carnival hell,&quot; FrT parodies and thus undermines the authority of the sermon exemplum as a genre.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>