<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274562">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A discursive bibliography of Chaucer studies for 2015, divided into five subcategories: general, CT, TC, other works, and reputation and reception.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274747">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys &quot;current critical trends&quot; in Chaucer studies, focusing on &quot;twenty-first-century interest in interconnectedness, intersubjectivity, and cultural networks.&quot; Then discusses &quot;Chaucer&#039;s own understanding of the construction of the self in relation to others and to the spaces in which he lived and worked,&quot; concluding with an &quot;analysis of the mental structures depicted&quot; in BD and HF as they reflect Chaucer&#039;s &quot;understanding that private spaces can be problematic for imaginative and personal development.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275040">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes the &quot;audacity and intensity&quot; of Spenser&#039;s debt to Chaucer, considering the later poet&#039;s archaisms, his allusions to and quotations of Chaucer (particularly in &quot;The Faerie Queene&quot;), and the importance of Chaucer to Spenser&#039;s English &quot;identity.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275459">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A discursive bibliography of Chaucer studies for 2016, divided into five subcategories: general, CT, TC, other works, and reputation and reception.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275460">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A discursive bibliography of Chaucer studies for 2016, divided into five subcategories: general, CT, TC, other works, and reputation and reception.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275471">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes the &quot;ideological investments&quot; that underlie the history of Chaucer biographies, explores authorial self-consciousness and the &quot;autobiographical impulse&quot; in early English literature, and explains the interests and emphases that underlie Turner&#039;s own biography of Chaucer--spaces and places, materiality, life-records, and Chaucer&#039;s &quot;internationalism.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275846">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Modern prose adaptation of PardPT, adapted into a fictional frame that refers to Passolini&#039;s cinematic version of CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275910">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A discursive bibliography of Chaucer studies for 2018, divided into six subcategories: general, CT, TC, LGW, other works, and reputation and reception.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276291">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discursive bibliography of Chaucer studies (ca. 1930-1960), with five sub-sections: Bibliographies, Editions, and the Chaucer Canon; Chaucer&#039;s Life and Times; Chaucer&#039;s English; General Critical Works; The Canterbury Tales; and Troilus and Criseyde and the Minor Works.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276325">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Treats Chaucer&#039;s major narrative poems as &quot;oral script(s)&quot; presented to a &quot;small and courtly audience,&quot; offering sustained readings that reflect the poems&#039; tensions between authority and experience (or &quot;pref&quot;) and address concerns of poetic freedom and human freedom. Each of the frames of the dream poems sets its narrative persona against traditional material in profound and comic ways simultaneously. TC transforms Boccaccio&#039;s &quot;Filostrato&quot; to emphasize the narrator&#039;s submission to poetic tradition and the characters&#039; struggles with social conventions. LGW lays clear the gaps between poetic theory, poetic practice, and audience responses. CT poses variations on human and poetic struggles to deal with constraining forces. The volume attends recurrently to differences between the factors involved in shaping medieval and modern responses to experiencing and understanding Chaucer&#039;s narrative poetry.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276450">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Presents a discursive bibliography of Chaucer studies for 2019, divided into five subcategories: general, CT, TC, other works, and reception.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276835">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A discursive bibliography of Chaucer studies for 2020, divided into four subcategories: general, CT, other works, and reception and reputation. Augmented by the bibliographies on &quot;Middle English&quot; in this volume of YWES.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277231">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Edits portions of CT (KnT, MilT, WBP, MerT, FranT, PardT, NPT, and PrT), selections from TC, and from lyrics (Truth, MercB) in Middle English, with introduction, notes, and glossary.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277235">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Edits portions of CT (KnT, MilT, WBP, MerT, FranT, PardT, NPT, and PrT), selections from TC, and from lyrics (Truth, MercB) in Middle English, with introduction, notes, and glossary.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277357">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A discursive bibliography of Chaucer studies for 2021, divided into four subcategories: general, CT, other works, and reception. See also &quot;Middle English,&quot; YWES 102 (2023): 171-263.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263605">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer. Lollius, and the Medieval Theory of Authorship]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Invoking recent attempts by Minnis and by Allen to establish a medieval literary theory by which to measure Chaucer, Millett analyzes Chaucer&#039;s use in TC of the &quot;auctor,&quot; &quot;Lollius,&quot; a &quot;transparent literary artifice.&quot;  Through his &quot;parody of the &#039;compilator&#039;s&#039; pose,&quot; Chaucer challenges basic values of &quot;the medieval theory of authorship.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270281">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer. Second Edition]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Designed for &quot;graduate and advanced students,&quot; this selective bibliography includes 3215 citations (more than 800 added to 1st edition, 1968), arranged in fourteen categories and sub-divided in several subordinate categories, with separate sections for individual works and tales and apocryphal materials. The entries are numbered sequentially and accompanied by an Author Index.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276643">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;ın Lirik Sanatı: &quot;Troilus ve Criseyde&#039;de&quot; Şarkılar ve Mektuplar. [The Lyric Art of Chaucer: Songs and Letters in &quot;Troilus and Criseyde.&quot;]]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Analyzes the songs and letters embedded in TC as lyric forms that function &quot;in several senses such as means of self-expression of characters--their bliss or afflictions, fundamental communication tools of characters, mediums that assure secrecy in terms of court literature and instruments representing both human love and eternal love.&quot; Comments on similar lyrics moments in stories of Troilus and Criseyde by Boccaccio, Henryson, and Shakespeare. Includes an abstract in Turkish as well as English.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265553">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s &#039;A Treatise on the Astrolabe&#039;: A 600-year-old Model for Humanizing Technical Documents]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Astr shows how technical writers can &quot;judiciously incorporate into their writing such central rhetorical components as coherent structure, appropriate content, accurate and precise descriptions, personable tone, effective metadiscourse, and varied sentence structure and length.&quot;  The work shows how Chaucer merged his &quot;logico-rational&quot; and &quot;humanistic&quot; selves.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264065">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s &#039;ABC&#039;: Line 39 and the Irregular Stanza Again]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[&quot;The Pilgrimage of the Lyf of the Manhode,&quot; the ME translation of de Guilleville&#039;s &quot;Pelerinage de la vie humaine,&quot; leads to an emendation of Chaucer&#039;s lyric, which should probably read (lines 38-39): &quot;So litel shal thanne in me be founde / That but thou er that day (correcte vice). &quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263804">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Aeneid&#039;: &#039;The Naked Text in English&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The &quot;Legend of Dido&quot; explicitly evokes its pretexts:  the narrator names Virgil and Ovid and summarizes, paraphrases, and purposefully distorts the texts.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263830">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Ambages&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In his adaptation of Boccaccio in TC, Chaucer Latinizes his source, pretending to follow the classical &quot;Lollius.&quot;  The same tendency may be observed in vocabulary, as Chaucer adds several words of Latin origin to the lexicon, glossing them with the &quot;that is to seyn&quot; formula.  &quot;Ambages&quot; (TC 5.897), for example, though drawn from Boccaccio&#039;s Italian, recalls Virgil (Aeneid 6.99)]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265323">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s &#039;An ABC&#039; in and out of Context]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines the textual tradition of ABC in its manuscripts and early editions, describing its popularity in manuscripts and its relatively late appearance in print in 1602.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262505">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Anelida and Arcite&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The shift from the first person of Anelida&#039;s complaint to the third person of the narrator&#039;s commentary is not an artistic flaw.  Attributing the commentary to the Chaucerian narrator is consistent with that character&#039;s pose as inexperienced and unlucky in love.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264449">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Anelida and Arcite&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[As suggested by the manuscripts, Anel is a complete, finished poem (with the omission of an unchaucerian final stanza).  It is concerned with the theme of poetry as an art functioning as a record of history.  Its closest affiliations are with the Theban material of TC, book 5, and with LGW.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>