<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274241">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, His Boethius, and the Narrator of His Troilus.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses the narrator of TC as a &quot;translator-commentator&quot; of his story, analogous to Chaucer&#039;s relation to Boethius&#039;s material when producing his Bo. This dynamic enables the narrator to stand apart from the temporality of his plot while simultaneously participating in it--a dual perspective that is like that of Boethius&#039;s own narrator and aligned with his themes of the relationships between eternality and temporality and Providence and free will.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275397">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, His Prioress, the Jews, and Professor Robinson.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Offers information about &quot;medieval papal denunciations of anti-semitism&quot; and how they can be seen to indict the Prioress, especially PrT 7.684-87, particularly because &quot;Chaucer&#039;s references to the Hebrew people,&quot; outside PrT, &quot;are not at all derogatory.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265770">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Humanism, and Printing: Conditions of Authorship in Fifteenth-Century England]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Inferences about Chaucer&#039;s court life and patronage provided literary successors with a model for the profitabliity of writing poetry, which--along with the increase in the number of Italian humanists and the advent of printing--fostered the viability of literary professionalism in fifteenth-century England.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262743">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Jean de Meun, and Proverbs 30:20]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Traces the Prioress&#039;s table manners to a biblical text.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274580">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, John Donne, and &quot;The Flea&quot;: A &quot;Robertsonian&quot; Perspective.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Proposes viewing Donne&#039;s poem &quot;The Flea&quot; from the theoretical perspective of D. W. Robertson, and argues that &quot;if we read Donne&#039;s poem as Robertson reads Chaucer, a different kind of Donne emerges&quot; than previously shown by scholars.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266804">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Joyce, Lacan, and Their &#039;We-Men&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Both Chaucer and Joyce are incapable of depicting women because the language they use is solipsisticly male and logocentric.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Liang uses the theories of Jacques Lacan and Jacques Derrida to explore the intrinsic ambiguity of logocentrism, the interpenetrability it prompts, and analogies between such interpenetrability and incest.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275178">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Kant, and Continental Materialism.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Shows how NPT, FranT, and Ret reveal the rigor of Chaucer&#039;s philosophy, comparing matter-form distinctions underlying these works with the positions of a wide range of notable philosophers, from Plato and Aristotle to Jacques Lacan and François Laruelle, the latter closest to Chaucer&#039;s perspective. NPT &quot;serves as&quot; Chaucer&#039;s Logic; FranT his Ethics; with Ret as &quot;a formal retraction of a formal retraction,&quot; through which we &quot;experience [Chaucer&#039;s] love for us&quot; by way of (un-)decidability.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264670">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Langland and the Creative Imagination]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Aers explores the conflict between traditional Christian ideology and social and individual realities in &quot;Piers Plowman,&quot; and Langland&#039;s criticism of abuse of power in all ranks of the clerical hierarchy.  Langland calls for reformation within traditional ideology, resolving the tensions apocalyptically in his poetry, but at the end rejecting a millenarian renewal, and sees conscience pursuing grace alone.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s &quot;reflexivity&quot; is seen in the Wife of Bath&#039;s mockery of ecclesiastical traditions, and in the Pardoner&#039;s exposures.  TC reveals Chaucer&#039;s concern with the manipulative pressures that subordinate human relationships to patriarchal militaristic glory.  The &quot;marriage group&quot; except for FranT in CT show how both sexes were engulfed in an orthodoxy which maintained women as subservient and marriage as a commodity exchange.  KnT shows the realities of and human attitudes involved in militarism.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272458">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Langland, and Fourteenth-Century Literary History]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Introduction by Steven Justice. Collection of essays on a range of subjects, including Ricardian public poetry, form and authorship, and the role of the modern annotator. Includes three chapters primarily devoted to CT: &quot;Chaucer&#039;s &#039;New Men&#039; and the Good of Literature in the Canterbury Tales,&quot; (27-60); &quot;The Physician&#039;s Tale and Love&#039;s Martyrs: &#039;Ensamples Mo than Ten&#039; as a Method in the Canterbury Tales,&quot; (61-84); and &quot;The Clerk and his Tale: Some Literary Contexts&quot; (85-112), all previously published.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271847">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Langland, and the Hundred Years&#039; War]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comments on how the Hundred Years War &quot;infiltrates&quot; CT by way of &quot;the first trio of portraits&quot; and their depictions of late medieval warfare. Clarifies the meaning of &quot;chyvachie&quot; in the description of the Squire and dilates upon the significance of the English occupation of Calais, which shared a border with the places where the Squire fought.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272209">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Langland, Arthur: Essays in Middle English Literature]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Collects twenty essays by Kellogg (five co-authored), several of them reprinted.  Fourteen of the essays pertain to Chaucer, with four of them printed here for the first time.  Includes a subject index. For the new essays that pertain to Chaucer, search for Chaucer, Langland, Arthur  under Alternative Title. ]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262732">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Livy, and Bersuire: The Roman Materials in &#039;The Physician&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Compares Chaucer&#039;s treatment of characters to Gower&#039;s, reviews critical opinion regarding Chaucer&#039;s use of sources, and refutes Edgar F. Shannon, Jr.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264119">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Love Poetry, and Romantic Love]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer derived his concepts of love poetry from various contemporary traditions of romantic love.  He satirized the concepts of &quot;fin amour&quot; with a firm knowledge of its contrasting forms and unpredictable variety, utilizing all its aspects from its loftiest virginal adulation to its basis in sexual eroticism.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267396">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Lucretius, and the Prologue to the Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Lucretius&#039;s &quot;De rerum natura&quot; may have influenced the reverdie, or spring song, that opens GP. Lucretius&#039;s reverdie predates and almost certainly influenced those in the &quot;Georgics&quot; and the &quot;Pervigilius veneris,&quot; already linked to The General Prologue.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264833">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Lydgate, and the &#039;Myrie Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In CT Chaucer defines and redefines &quot;myrie tale.&quot;  Ultimately it is neither mere entertainment, nor pure instruction, not even sentence and solace.  A truly &quot;myrie tale&quot; must be &quot;fructuous,&quot; i.e., truly edifying.  Only ParsT fits, for poetry is inherently ambiguous, unreliable, fruitless.  Lydgate disagrees.  In his &quot;Canterbury Tale,&quot; &quot;The Siege of Thebes,&quot; he gives poetry a political dimension and makes the tale a moral speculum that is beneficial practically as well as spiritually.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276555">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Lydgate, and the Half-Heard Nightingale.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys the functions and understanding of the nightingale in myth, literature, music, and sign theory, observing how the bird &quot;inhabits the borders between states of being.&quot; Then discusses its roles in John Lydgate&#039;s &quot;A Seying of the Nightingale&quot; and in LGW and TC, where the birs&#039;s &quot;de-mythification&quot; nevertheless embodies ambiguous &quot;states of being&quot; between &quot;reverie and dream-vision, melody and song, and traditional femininity and biological masculinity.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269335">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Mary Magdalene, and the Consolation of Love]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[New facets of Chaucer&#039;s writing on love, consolation, and repentance are illuminated when we assume that Chaucer did translate Pseudo-Origen&#039;s &quot;De Maria Magdalena,&quot; as he claims to have done in LGWP G418 (&quot;Orygenes upon the Maudeleyne&quot;).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262050">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Massahala, and Bodleian Selden Supra 78]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The ms cited, an anthology of astronomical treatises possibly compiled in Spain c.1303, and transferred to England c.1350,may contain the specific sources for Chaucer&#039;s Astr.  Two Chaucerian interpolations coincide with ms marginalia, and Chaucer&#039;s projected work on astronomy (Astr. intro.) reflects the general contents of the ms.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268252">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Medieval Drama and a Newly Discovered Seventeenth-Century Play: The Survival of Medieval Stereotypes?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that a seventeenth-century play, &quot;The Wisest Have Their Fools About Them,&quot; may reflect the influence of Chaucerian fabliau and some late-medieval stage traditions. Baldwin&#039;s analysis focuses on stereotypical characters.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275818">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Milton, and the Reverend William Stukeley, M.D.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Identifies three references in the correspondence and diary of Reverend Stukeley to a portrait (or portraits) of Chaucer and to a proposed edition of the poet&#039;s works.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262350">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Music, and Song]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s &quot;modernity&quot; and &quot;humanity&quot; are experienced through his lyrics, says Prescott, who, as composer and librettist, has drawn her own original libretti from CT, HF, LGW, and TC and had them set to music by Roger Nixon.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266266">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, narrador moderno y ejemplo de clasicimo]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Focuses on NPT as an example of Chaucer&#039;s combination of linguistic ambiguity and limited or unreliable narration, his &quot;modern&quot; features.  Chaucer&#039;s works are classics because his techniques accord well with the narrative theories of modern critics such as Wayne Booth and Tzvetan Todorov.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274581">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Nashe, and &quot;The Choice of Valentines.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Presents overlap between Chaucer&#039;s writings and the writings of Thomas Nashe, particularly the late sixteenth-century poem &quot;The Choice of Valentines,&quot; which is &quot;considered to be the most pornographic piece of writing to survive&quot; Shakespeare&#039;s time. Argues that Nashe&#039;s poem is connected to Chaucer in that &quot;both writers often taught traditional Christian messages by using highly ironic methods.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263340">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Pavia and the Ciel d&#039;Oro]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Responding to Coleman&#039;s study (Medium AEvum 51 (1982): 92-101), adduces reasons for a Chaucerian visit to Pavia in 1378.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273476">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, poete multilingue, mais jusqu&#039;ou?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines Chaucer&#039;s literary exchanges with contemporary French writers, including his interest in &quot;Flaundres, in Artoys, and Pycardie.&quot; Offers<br />
how Chaucer&#039;s translation of Rom confirms his fascination with the duchy&#039;s growing empire, where Picard was the lingua franca.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>