<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276454">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Italian Culture.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Collection of essays focusing on Chaucer&#039;s engagement with &quot;Italian tradition&quot; and his use and interpretation of Italian sources. For eight individual essays, search for Chaucer and Italian Culture under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271431">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Italian Textuality]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Studies how Chaucer&#039;s ClT may have been affected by the Italian textual tradition. The first part of the book concentrates on the Italian texts, particularly the Manelli codex of Boccaccio, &quot;Decameron&quot; X.10. The second part considers how the Hengwrt and Ellesmere manuscripts present ClT, its envoy, and WBP. Appendices compile the glosses from Manelli, Hengwrt, and Ellesmere.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261497">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Italy]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys Chaucer&#039;s familiarity with Italian and his debt to Dante, Petrarch, and Boccaccio.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274009">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Italy: Contexts and/of Sources.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys studies of Chaucer&#039;s uses of Dante and Boccaccio as sources, focusing on work done since 1980 and &quot;highlighting new and forthcoming work.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272001">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Jean de Meun as Self-Conscious Narrators: The Prologue to the &#039;Legend of Good Women&#039; and the &#039;Roman de la Rose&#039; 10307-680]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that in LGWP Chaucer derives his tone from Jean de Meun&#039;s self-conscious narratation in the &quot;Roman de la Rose,&quot; as well as many &quot;particularities . . . of himself as love and writer.&quot; Chaucer&#039;s narrator is a caricature of Jean&#039;s Amant, an &quot;inversion&quot; or &quot;antithesis,&quot; even though each poet successfully justifies the &quot;non-courtly contents&quot; of his works.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263549">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Jean de Meun: Their Translations of Boethius&#039;s &#039;De Consolatione Philosophiae&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Compares Bo with Jean de Meun&#039;s and other versions and discusses Chaucer&#039;s translation technique and style.  Scholars need more information on Chaucer&#039;s use of Jean de Meun and on medieval French translations of &quot;De consolatione philosophae.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In Japanese.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266013">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Jean Le Fevre]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that LGW was inspired by Jean Le Fevre&#039;s &quot;Lamentations de Matheolus&quot; (1371-72?) and &quot;Livre de Leesce&quot; (1373 or 1380-87).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262932">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and John of Garland: Memory and Style in the First Fragment]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The levels of style of the first three Canterbury tales correspond to John of Garland&#039;s columnar figure, which is itself a memory locus derived from classical rhetoric.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277479">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and John of Gaunt: Finding a Way to Break into History.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Suggests John of Gaunt commissioned BD to elegize Blanche of Lancaster and to claim a &quot;new future,&quot; a move inspired by Edward I&#039;s memorialization of Eleanor of Castile. An &quot;important commission for Chaucer,&quot; BD gave him &quot;opportunity to begin to develop a perspective on history that guided his later thinking,&quot; characterized by ventriloquizing &quot;lessons taught by noble ladies&quot; reinforced through the poem&#039;s &quot;balancing references to Troy against those to Rome.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274339">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and John of Legnano.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explicates Chaucer&#039;s reference to John of Legnano (&quot;Lynyan&quot; at ClT 4.34), clarifying the international reputation of the canon lawyer and his role in justifying the papal schism, suggesting how Chaucer may have learned of him during his 1378 mission to Italy, and explaining why the Clerk&#039;s reference to Petrarch is &quot;heightened and expanded&quot; by his reference to Legnano.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263172">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Joyce]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A comparison, not a source study, which discovers parallel attitudes toward style, character, and tradition, especially on the role of humor in &quot;Ulysess&quot; and CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268752">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Langland : A Fellowship of Makers]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Economou considers a range of possibilities--that Chaucer and Langland knew each other, knew each other&#039;s works, or shared the same literary context. Focuses on GP and Ret of CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267888">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Langland : Literary Representations of History in 14th Century England]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Compares Chaucer&#039;s use of history in BD with that of Langland in &quot;Piers Plowman,&quot; suggesting that focus on contemporary events is common to the poets and perhaps indicative of their common audience. Such commonalities and the habits of mind they reflect may enable us to define more clearly what is meant by &quot;Ricardian&quot; literature.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267743">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Langland as Religious Writers]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer and Langland are both &quot;great religious writers,&quot; although Langland is more deeply engaged in &quot;who and what God is.&quot; Both writers are poets of religious experience: Chaucer explores pathos, and Langland confronts the &quot;central beliefs of Christianity.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262382">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Langland: Historical and Textual Approaches]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Occasional essays previously published on Chaucer and Langland.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269413">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Langland: The Antagonistic Tradition]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s preeminence over Langland is an effect of historical and social forces and must be revised, because tradition is a conflicted notion that helps construct understanding of past, present, and future. Chaucer was a medium of this process, &quot;the literary &#039;first mover&#039; meant to generate succession and guarantee cultural continuity.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Topics include destabilization of Chaucer as origin of the tradition; naming as a source of his authority; appropriation of Langland by various forces in history as opposed to a &quot;coherent, self-conscious&quot; attempt by Hoccleve and Lydgate to establish Chaucer as &quot;father&quot; so that they might inherit the tradition; and the role of print culture in establishing reputations of each author. Bowers focuses on CT generally, with some attention to CkT, the Host, MkT, ParsT, and TC.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267723">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Language: Essays in Honour of Douglas Wurtele]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Ten essays that pertain to Chaucer, plus a commemorative preface (by M. I. Cameron), an introduction (by David Williams) that summarizes the essays, a bibliography of Wurtele&#039;s publications, and a subject index. For individual essays that pertain to Chaucer, search for Chaucer and Language under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271479">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Late Medieval Language]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[&quot;Reviews work on Chaucer&#039;s language and its importance for the development of English literary language.&quot; Also suggests directions for future language studies.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271964">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Late Medieval Scholasticism: A Preliminary Study of Individuality and Experience]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Counters &quot;Robertsonian&quot; or exegetical criticism of Chaucer&#039;s works, particularly its neglect of &quot;later scholastic philosophy,&quot; focusing on views of individuality and experience found in writers such as Roger Bacon, Duns Scotus, and William of Ockham. Includes sustained attention to the exemplary value of PhyT, NPT, and ManT, and the characterizations of the Wife of Bath, the Pardoner, and Criseyde.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264783">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Leigh Hunt]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Like most of the early nineteenth-century critics, Leigh Hunt strove to bring about a popular revival of Chaucer.  But more important, he was among the first to attempt a technical analysis of Chaucer&#039;s poetry and to link his poetry with the idea of music.  Hunt added greatly to the Romantic conception of the poet.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264981">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Lists of Trees]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A detailed, tabulated comparison of tree-lists in Chaucer (Rom 1379-86, PF 176-82, KnT 2063-65) with those in his sources shows Chaucer becoming more familiar with a technical vocabulary, and more willing to adapt and augment his immediate sources with names and qualities drawn from ancillary texts.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271725">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Literary Criticism]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reviews Ian Robinson&#039;s book, &quot;Chaucer and the English Tradition&quot; (1972), with commentary on various critical works published between 1950 and 1972.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264993">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Literary Genre]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer does not attempt to work within the framework of such established literary forms as romance and fabliau.  The flaws in the genre approach become evident when the tales are judged from the broader perspective of medieval rhetoric and poetic.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275545">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Literary Historiography in John Lydgate&#039;s &quot;Siege of Thebes.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Points out that Chaucer develops the idea of interpretation through his works (especially CT), and demonstrates how Lydgate&#039;s &quot;The Siege of Thebes,&quot; drawing on Chaucer, revolves around the ideas of truth and interpretation.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262661">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Literary History]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that for most Chaucerian scholars historical criticism,which necessarily recognizes generic and cultural differences between our own time and the Middle Ages, is outweighed by aesthetic criticism, which is viewer-centered and oriented toward present, even personal, values and significance.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>