<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275509">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Remodeling Authorship in Lydgate&#039;s &quot;Fall of Princes.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines authorship and literary authority in the frame narrative of John Lydgate&#039;s &quot;Fall of Princes,&quot; considering his references to Chaucer as well as to other poets, and arguing that Lydgate did not give a &quot;disproportionate amount of literary authority&quot; to Chaucer, despite referring to him as &quot;maistir&quot; and giving him more lines than the others. More generally, Lydgate&#039;s references to predecessors construct &quot;a community of fellow authors who participate in a non-competitive model of authorship.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275508">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[An East-West Conversation: Gürpınar&#039;s &quot;A Marriage under the Comet&quot; and Chaucer&#039;s &quot;The Canterbury Tales.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Identifies &quot;similarities of character, action, and tone&quot; between Hüseyin Rahmi Gürpınar&#039;s Turkish novel &quot;Kuyruklu yildiz altında bir izdivaç&quot; (1912) and both MilT and WBT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275507">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Stories in Stanza&#039;d English: A Cross-Cultural &quot;Canterbury Tales.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Agbabi&#039;s personal account of adapting Chaucer&#039;s poetry in her &quot;Telling Tales&quot; (2014) and in her contribution to the anthology &quot;Refugee Tales&quot; (2016)--an adaptation of FranT entitled &quot;Makar.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275506">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Biblical Turn.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Finds Chaucer turning in MilT from classical sources and subject matter in works such as TC, LGW, and KnT, to biblical resources throughout CT. Like the Miller and Nicholas, Chaucer draws on &quot;the cultural authority of the Bible by means of its aesthetic forms (narrative and image) within a narrow range for their own ends.&quot; Chaucer&#039;s use is &quot;more effective&quot; than the Miller&#039;s and Nicholas&#039;s, however, &quot;because his authorial persona is decentered rather than self-centered and because his use of the Bible does not challenge the moral force of those of its meanings his culture believed were divine and not secret.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275505">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Grandson in the World: From the Pays de Vaud to Edward III&#039;s Court.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Clarifies the biography of Oton de Grandson (here &quot;Othon&quot;), particularly his role as &quot;one of the leading knight-poets of his time,&quot; exploring how his status inflected his influence on other writers, including Chaucer. Chaucer&#039;s lower social status disallowed direct imitation of the suffering &quot;I-voice&quot; of courtly knight-poets, affecting the narratorial stance in BD, PF, and Ven (a &quot;loose translation&quot; of Oton&#039;s &quot;Cinq balades ensuyvans&quot;). Also explores relations between the Valentine&#039;s Day tradition in Oton and in Mars and PF.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275504">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer, Gower and the Invention of History.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that the &quot;creative potential of understanding invention at once as a textual and historical concept . . . receives its fullest treatment in the poetic exchanges of Chaucer and Gower,&quot; examining how in MLT and MkT Chaucer undercuts Gower&#039;s efforts to shape history and rejuvenate culture, &quot;destabilizing Gower&#039;s model without offering a suitable replacement.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275503">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[On the Edge: Chaucer and Gower&#039;s Queer Glosses.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines glosses of John Gower&#039;s English text of &quot;Confessio Amantis&quot; and Chaucer&#039;s CT, especially MLT, and claims that Chaucer and Gower &quot;are acutely aware of the risks, and sometimes the pleasures, of misprision or queer (mis)interpretation&quot; as they develop &quot;ideas of authority&quot; in their poetry.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275502">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Sensibility of the Miscellaneous? The &quot;Canterbury Tales&quot; of Geoffrey Chaucer and the Works of Reginald Pecock.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considers late medieval miscellanea and the &quot;sensibility of the miscellaneous,&quot; using the concept of &quot;heterarchy,&quot; and assessing Nicholas of Lyre&#039;s discussion of the Psalter, the :Biblically licensed diversity&quot; of CT (evident in ParsT, Ret, and MelP), and Reginald Pecock&#039;s principle of &quot;divine reason.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275501">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Framing Chaucer&#039;s Plowman.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that the scriptural glosses found in Thomas Godfray&#039;s 1535 publication of &quot;The Ploughman&#039;s Tale&quot; are similar to Langland&#039;s techniques in &quot;Piers Plowman,&quot; as are the &quot;poem&#039;s anticlericism and alliteration&quot;; when Godfray republished the tale in William Thynne&#039;s &quot;Works of Geoffrey Chaucer&quot;(2nd ed., 1542), new paratextual apparatus aligned the poem with CT. Each of these paratextual frames helps &quot;to protect the text from censors while cultivating the wide audience sought by financially savvy printers.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275500">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Political Animals: Form and the Animal Fable in Langland&#039;s Rodent Parliament and Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Nun&#039;s Priest&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Identifies food-chain predation and ecosystemic competition as formal elements of animal fables; then examines these dynamics in NPT, the Rat Parliament of Langland&#039;s &quot;Piers Plowman,&quot; and their respective allusions to the Uprising of 1381 and to the English Parliaments of 1376 and 1377. Though varied, the two narratives capitalize on their animal-fable genre to critique hierarchical power, assert the value of laboring commons, and advocate political counsel rather than rebellion.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275499">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Ploughman&#039;s Tale.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that Mel and Langland&#039;s &quot;Piers Plowman&quot; share common features that derive from medieval school texts: axioms and proverbs, recurrent attention to the &quot;Distiches of Cato,&quot; and citational and translational practices grounded in school exercises. In these ways, Mel is Chaucer&#039;s most &quot;Langlandian&quot; text and, though Chaucer lends it credibility by assigning it to his Canterbury persona, he might well have assigned it to his Plowman.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275498">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Of Poets and Prologues.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses speech and silence in the characterizations and functions of the narrators of GP and the Prologue to &quot;Piers Plowman.&quot; Both narrator-figures are introduced &quot;through tropological silencing,&quot; but the &quot;muted contact&quot; of the GP narrator with the other pilgrims &quot;ushers in negotiations of interpersonal interactions&quot; and anticipates &quot;questions of social order&quot; and &quot;communal identity&quot; in CT, while the &quot;unvoiced aurality&quot; of Langland&#039;s narrator becomes &quot;part of [his] poem&#039;s pervasive concern over what constitutes virtuous speaking&quot; and poetry.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275497">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Non-Debt to Langland.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reviews critical studies that offer, accept, or defend arguments that Chaucer knew and was influenced by William Langland&#039;s &quot;Piers Plowman,&quot; challenging them on the grounds of weak logic, uncertain assumptions, lack of evidence, and/or the commonplace or spurious nature of claimed connections.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275496">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Langland&#039;s Boethius.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Identifies various ways Boethius&#039;s &quot;Consolation of Philosophy&quot; influenced Langland&#039;s &quot;Piers Plowman&quot; formally and thematically, and suggests in conclusion that, unlike other late medieval English writers, Langland and Chaucer &quot;are interested in subjecting the wisdom of the &#039;Consolation&#039; to the pressures of the world as it can be represented in fiction.&quot; Also suggests that Langland&#039;s work may have been the &quot;catalyst&quot; of Chaucer in this regard.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275495">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Afterword [to &quot;Chaucer&#039;s Langland&quot;].]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comments on the studies included in a cluster of essays entitled &quot;Chaucer&#039;s Langland&quot; (YLS 32 (2018) and, acknowledging the difficulties of establishing direct influence between Langland and Chaucer, describes a variety of dissimilarities between their works, explaining how differences in style, genre, attitude, and emphasis reflect and illuminate the poets&#039; ethical, intellectual, social, and political worlds.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275494">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Introduction [to &quot;Chaucer&#039;s Langland&quot;].]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Tallies several differences and similarities between Chaucer&#039;s and Langland&#039;s works and worlds, comments on the relative prominence of Chaucer studies, and introduces the seven essays in a special section of YLS entitled &quot;Chaucer&#039;s Langland.&quot; For these essays, search for Yearbook of Langland Studies 32 (2018) under Journal by Volume Number.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275493">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Rolle Reassembled: Booklet Production, Single-Author<br />
Anthologies, and the Making of Bodley 861.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores connections between authority and production/distribution in Bodley 861. Briefly compares the Bodley scribe and scribe B in the Hengwrt CT, discusses Chaucer&#039;s shorter poems and their dependence on external evidence, and discusses John Shirley as the copyist of Adam.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275492">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Dynamics of the Medieval Manuscript: Text Collections from a European Perspective.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Twenty-three essays by various authors and an introduction by the editors, all of which pertain to the study of medieval short narratives as they appear in multi-text manuscripts, addressing concerns such as &quot;miscellaneity,&quot; paratexts, genres, co-texts, reception, and ownership. The volume contains an index of manuscripts, but no general subject index. For four essays that pertain to Chaucer, search for The Dynamics of the Medieval Manuscript under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275491">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[What John Shirley Said about Adam: Authorship and Attribution in Cambridge, Trinity College, MS R.3.20.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses the value of John Shirley&#039;s attribution of Adam Scriveyn to Chaucer in the only manuscript where it appears, arguing on the grounds of Shirley&#039;s &quot;other statements about Chaucer&quot; that the attribution is reliable and, on more general external evidence, that Shirley &quot;might have known scribes who had worked for Chaucer,&quot; including Adam Pinkhurst.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275490">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Dynamics of the European Short Narrative in Its Manuscript Context: The Case of Pyramus and Thisbe.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Traces the emphases and manuscript contexts of Latin and vernacular versions of the Pyramus and Thisbe story from Ovidian origins to Chaucer&#039;s narrative in LGW, with emphasis on the comic or bathetic elements of Chaucer&#039;s account and on its place in the Findern manuscript (Cambridge University Library, MS Ff.1.6).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275489">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Shared Exemplars and the Creation of Miscellanies in the Manuscripts of &quot;Troilus and Criseyde.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Summarizes and extends recent scholarship on Guildhall scribe Richard Osbarn, and assesses his work, focusing on two TC manuscripts to which he contributed: San Marino, Huntington Library, MS HM 114, and London, British Library, MS Harley 3943. Examines paratextual aspects of the two--particularly their marginal glosses--and what they may imply about Osbarn&#039;s exemplar(s) and the text of TC.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275488">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Findern Codex and the Blog In the Middle: Understanding Middle English Vernacular Manuscripts Through the Lens of Social Media in the Twenty-First<br />
Century.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines the arrangement and composition of two of the booklets of the Findern manuscript (Cambridge University Library, MS Ff.1.6) for the ways they may be seen as &quot;the record of interactions within the community of readers and scribes who had access to it&quot; (161), suggesting similarities with internet blogging. Includes comments on the location and presentation of several works by Chaucer: the legend of Thisbe from LGW, Anelida&#039;s Complaint from Anel, and The Complaint of Venus.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275487">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Art of Allusion: Illuminators and the Making of English Literature, 1403-1476.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines the importance of visual images in late medieval manuscripts, and the significance of manuscript illuminators in the development and spread of English literary culture. Discusses illuminated manuscripts of Chaucer&#039;s CT, and illustrated works of Gower and Lydgate.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275486">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Trans Textuality: Dysphoria in the Depths of Medieval Skin.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Wonders how the transgender experience allows a &quot;trans textuality&quot; and offers an example of this proposed theoretical approach to manuscripts via a consideration of the Ellesmere manuscript.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275485">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Female Audience of the Manuscripts of Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Canterbury Tales.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[&quot;[R]evisits&quot; the manuscripts of CT &quot;in order to piece together the evidence of women&#039;s involvement in the consumption and circulation of this work,&quot; using &quot;visualisations to map the social networks of women connected to the manuscripts and explore the localisation of each book in the select corpus to investigate how it affects these networks.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>