<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276005">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sloane MS 1098.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[E-book facsimile of London, British Library, MS Sloane 1098, which includes CYT, 1428–71.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276004">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sloane MS 1009.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[E-book facsimile of London, British Library, MS Sloane 1009, which includes Mel.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276003">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sloane MS 320.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[E-book facsimile of London, British Library, MS Sloane 320, which includes CYT, 1428–81.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276002">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Series of Unfortunate Events: Stanza Disarrangements in Hoccleve&#039;s &quot;Letter of Cupid.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reviews how, in ten manuscript witnesses, the sixty-eight stanzas of &quot;Letter&quot; are misordered, in four distinct ways, three of which stem from collation errors. Though &quot;unfortunate&quot; for the poem, the errors &quot;provide another few data points&quot; regarding the connections among fifteenth-century Chaucerian miscellanies, and support contemporary hypotheses pertaining to the mechanics of professional book production.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276001">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Miscellaneous Alchemical Works, Once Owned by Stephen Williams.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[E-book facsimile of London, British Library, MS Sloane 1723, which includes CYT, 1428–81.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276000">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Short Form Þt in Hengwrt and Ellesmere: A Shorthand Symbol as Opposed to a Contraction.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Confronts as an &quot;orthographic paradox&quot; Scribe B&#039;s uses of &quot;Þt,&quot; arguing that the &quot;short form is not specific to the orthography of the exemplar but generic to all variants&quot; of the word &quot;that.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275999">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[&quot;Ye that heres and sees this vision&quot;: Imagined Readers, Imagined Reading in Late Medieval English Devotional Writing.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Includes discussion of the version of ParsT in Longleat, MS 29, a compilation of devotional works where Chaucer&#039;s name is &quot;cut from the tale and the work presented in an unambiguously religious context.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275998">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Nun&#039;s Priest&#039;s Tale.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys the critical history of NPT, including the scant comments focused on the tale between the fifteenth and nineteenth centuries. Argues that the &quot;tale&#039;s interest in direct experience acts as means of liberations from the plethora of discourses in which it becomes mired.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275997">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Prioress&#039;s Tale.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses the Prioress&#039;s antisemitism in PrT within the context of late medieval religious feeling, in order to &quot;understand it from within so as more effectively to analyze it.&quot; Traces &quot;the condensation of a complex set of antisemitic ideas, wrapped up with such basic terms of human life as embodiment, voice, space, and time.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275996">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Pardoner and His &quot;Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Catalogues the contours of criticism of the Pardoner in PardT, including critical praise of the tale&#039;s alleged &quot;superiority as a tale.&quot; Argues that the pilgrims&#039; revulsion toward the Pardoner is rooted in his homosexual identity, which is connected to performance of his tale. ]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275995">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Franklin&#039;s Symptomatic &quot;Sursanure.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses FranT and its inclusion of the &quot;sursanure&quot;, the superficially healed wound that nevertheless continues to fester. Suggests that this &quot;sursanure&quot; is &quot;an exemplary Jamesonian symptom, the complex layerings of which invite readers to prise apart issues in the tale itself.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275994">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Griselda and the Problem of the Human in the &quot;Clerk&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that ClT offers a view of what it means to be human, and that Chaucer&#039;s view differs significantly from Petrarch&#039;s presentation, in his translation of Boccaccio&#039;s Griselda story in the &quot;Decameron,&quot; of Walter&#039;s cruelty and Griselda&#039;s patience in the face of that suffering.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275993">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Wife of Bath&#039;s Prologue and Tale.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explains how the Wife of Bath dominates not only her own material in WBPT, but also CT as a whole. Discusses generic expectations for the Wife and her handling of biblical and classical material, to demonstrate that she represents &quot;an irreducibly disruptive way of reading, knowing, and desiring&quot; in CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275992">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Man of Law&#039;s Tale.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Traces several interpretative concerns raised by MLT and demonstrates how the tale &quot;has much to teach us about the layered, multipart narrative of project&quot; of CT. Discusses &quot;gender and religious difference,&quot; the secular and the sacred, the &quot;circulation of people and knowledge,&quot; and the representations of narration and teller in MLT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275991">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[&quot;The Miller&#039;s Tale&quot; and the Art of &quot;Solaas.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Offers a &quot;step by step&quot; reading of MilT &quot;as it unfolds its argument.: Focuses on the crafting of the fabliau that refers to common elements of the genre and to Chaucer&#039;s specific context. Argues that the &quot;artful carelessness of the Miller&quot; is an &quot;ideal&quot; that the Reeve demonstrates cannot be maintained.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275990">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[&quot;The Knight&#039;s Tale&quot; and the Estrangements of Form.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Accounts for the &quot;strangeness&quot; of KnT, cataloguing various theoretical and interpretative approaches, beginning with Charles Muscatine&#039;s scholarly contributions and ending with Elizabeth Scala&#039;s &quot;Desire in the Canterbury Tales.&quot; Links each of these approaches, in spite of their differences, with the formalist concerns of KnT and its differences from the &quot;Thebaid&quot; and the &quot;Teseida.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275989">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The &quot;General Prologue.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys approaches to reception and interpretation of GP. Reappraises GP&#039;s incompleteness as a symbol for the incompleteness of memory, establishing the beginning of CT as a kind of machinery that &quot;set[s] the roadside drama in motion once again.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275988">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Form of the &quot;Canterbury Tales.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Emphasizes Chaucer&#039;s development of form in CT. Demonstrates that Chaucer&#039;s experiments with form in CT and other works, including TC, are traced to origins in Boccaccio&#039;s works, and argues for a connection between these formal experiments and Chaucer&#039;s content.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275987">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Talking about Chaucer with School Teachers.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reviews personal experiences of helping secondary teachers learn how to approach and teach Chaucer. Offers both a summary of the necessity of this kind of outreach and the results of these types of interactions.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275986">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reading Chaucer: Easier than You Think?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses how professors can help students approach difficult texts such as CT, whether by helping students choose good translations or by sharing methods with non-medievalists, in particular modernists, who also confront hard-to-read.<br />
materials.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275985">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Sense of an Ending.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses the many frustrated or incomplete endings in the tales of CT, and argues that &quot;Chaucer&#039;s formal work with endings demonstrates all the many ways that things might remain unresolved.&quot; Traces endings from several different tales, including ManT and ParsT, and contextualizes how these various endings operate in a work centered on pilgrimage.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275984">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Moral Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses the &quot;narrowness&quot; of modern views of Chaucer and CT, and argues that this posture hides the range of Chaucer&#039;s verse, which includes not only beast fables and fabliaux, but also saints&#039; lives and penitential discourse. ]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275983">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scholarship or Distraction? New Forums for Talking about Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses public-facing writing about Chaucer and his texts and argues that &quot;this writing&#039;s engagement with contemporary politics speaks to our and our students&#039; experiences, and is already changing the direction of both classroom practice and traditional Chaucer scholarship.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275982">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[&quot;The Friar&#039;s Tale&quot; and &quot;The Summoner&#039;s Tale&quot; in Word and Deed.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reappraises FrT and SumT and acknowledges the professional and personal animosity at the root of the tellers&#039; relationship to each other. Argues for a wider sense of that relationship between the tales and their tellers, contending that this animosity &quot;binds them closely to the economic concerns&quot; of CT and, &quot;more crucially, its social and linguistic ones.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275981">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Who Will Pay?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Traces the problem of compensation and the rationale for dedicating funds to the study of Chaucer. Offers a case study of how a previous attempt at funding worked in 2010 in Australia when the Centre for the History of Emotions was awarded funding by the Australian Research Council.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>