<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275877">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scribal Oeuvres: &quot;Chaucer&#039;s Scribe&quot; and his &quot;Canterbury Tales.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chapter 5 in Hanna&#039;s book-length introduction to the study of English medieval books and manuscripts, revisiting and offering new and revised opinions of the nature, value, and relations between the Hengwrt and Ellesmere manuscripts of CT. Includes discussion of Adam Pinkhurst as scribe and his relation with Chaucer, textual and paratextual concerns, questions of patronage, dating, the order of the tales, the contexts of manuscript production, and the early transmission of CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262506">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scribal Role, Authorial Intention, and Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Boece&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[That the Bo scribes altered their text in a number of substantive ways suggests that the &quot;Consolatione&quot; was not a fixed text but a living tradition.  This tradition became even more diverse whenever the &quot;Consolatione&quot; was translated.  The implication of scribal alteration in texts such as Bo involve the definitions of author and authorial intention and impinge on the procedures and goals of a modern editor.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267637">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scribe D and the Marketing of Ricardian Literature]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Codicological analysis of the &quot;Taylor Gower,&quot; produced by scribe D, who also produced two manuscripts of CT. This scribe and his &quot;shadow&quot; scribe (Scribe Delta) indicate possible entrepreneurial activity among English vernacular copyists.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268898">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scribe D&#039;s SW Midland Roots: A Reconsideration]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The authors analyze the spelling and dialect evidence of manuscripts attributed to Scribe D (including CT) and argue that the southwestern dialect features derive from exemplars rather than from the scribe&#039;s own dialect. This argument, in turn, raises questions about the relative chronology of the manuscripts and challenges assumptions that scribes converted copytexts into their own dialects. More generally, the rise of a London standard may have been slower than previously thought.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267634">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scribes and Booklets of Trinity College, Cambridge, Manuscripts R.3.19 and R.3.21]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Codicological analysis of the two manuscripts, which include works by Chaucer and Lydgate, Chaucerian apocrypha, and related works. Assessment of the booklets in the manuscripts and the habits of the two scribes (&quot;scribe A&quot; and the &quot;Hammond scribe&quot;) indicates that the works were produced in something like a &quot;publishing business&quot; and perhaps compiled in their present form by John Stow.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265744">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scribes and Hypertext]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comments on scribal habits reflected in late-medieval English manuscripts and assesses the utility of electronic hypertext to record variations, using examples from Chaucer and other Middle English authors. ]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[  Medieval scribal practice may be the closest available analogue to hypertext composition.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261214">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scribes and Manuscript Traditions]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores editorial implications of the South-West Midlands features of several London copyings of works by Chaucer, Gower, and Langland, including four manuscripts of the CT (Ha4, La, Cp, Pw).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272363">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scribes and the City: Guildhall Clerks and the Dissemination of Middle English Literature, 1375-1425]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comprehensive study of scribes from the London Guildhall responsible for copying Chaucer&#039;s earliest manuscripts, including Adam Pinkhurst, Guildhall scrivener from 1378-1410.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269109">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scribes as Authors : Substantive Variation in Some Late Middle English Manuscripts]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Morrison examines textual transmission before print, referring to Chaucer as evidence of authors&#039; concerns about deficient scribal copying.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273419">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scribes Misattributed: Hoccleve and Pinkhurst.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Critiques the methods and conclusions of various analyses of late medieval English vernacular scribes, challenging the arguments that British Library, MS Royal 17 D.XVIII is Thomas Hoccleve&#039;s holograph; that Adam Pinkhurst was &quot;Scribe B&quot; of Cambridge, Trinity College, MS R.3.2 (John Gower&#039;s &quot;Confessio Amantis&quot;); that Adam Pinkhurst was the scribe of the Hengwrt and Ellesmere CT manuscripts; and giving various corollary discussions. Finds &quot;no evidence&quot; that Pinkhurst knew Chaucer, even though he did embellish a manuscript of Bo, and calls for renewed attention to all pertinent and available evidence in scribal analysis.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275587">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scribes of Space: Place in Middle English Literature and Late Medieval Science.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores how philosophers, theologians, poets, and other thinkers in late medieval England altered ancient ideas of geographical space. Analyzes medieval science, theology, literature, and maps, and the &quot;relationship between high science and high literature&quot; of the Middle Ages. Looks at the &quot;science of motion&quot; in HF and ideas of &quot;local space&quot; in PrT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273980">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scribes, Printers, and the Accidentals of Their Texts.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Ten essays by various authors on textual concerns of late medieval English manuscripts and early printed books. For three essays that pertain to Chaucer, search for Scribes, Printers, and the Accidentals of Their Texts under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271873">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scribit Mater: Mary and the Language Arts in the Literature of Medieval England]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Investigates &quot;constructions of Mary as Lady Rhetorica, &#039;magistra&#039; for language studies, muse for poetry, and exemplar of perfected speech in a fallen world.&quot; Chapter 4, &quot;Chaucer and Dame School,&quot; considers how ABC, PrT, and SNT &quot;depict a hierarchy of Marian studies and the Virgin&#039;s intervention at every level of language learning,&quot; from elementary learning in dame schools to advanced study in the trivium.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276965">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scripting the Nation: Court Poetry and the Authority of History in Late Medieval Scotland.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes a &quot;widespread nationalistic feeling&quot; in late medieval and early modern Scotland, with particular attention to Latin chroniclers, court poets in the reign of James IV, and their similar uses of Scottish myths of origin in resistance to English  ones. Includes discussion of how the Selden manuscript &quot;appropriates Chaucerian material to its own nationalistic vision&quot;; how William Dunbar &quot;claims Chaucer as a literary ancestor&quot; while he asserts his own nationalistic voice; and how, for Gavin Douglas, Chaucer exemplifies past English glory that has degenerated in contrast with growing Scottish prestige.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261552">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scriptura Rescripta: The (Ab)use of the Bible by Medieval Writers]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Medieval uses of the Bible include imitation, satire, and parody.  Chaucer&#039;s biblical quotations and allusions, which number more than seven hundred, are used to prove a proposition, to reinforce a statement, to enhance some personage, to criticize a rascal&#039;s life or action, to heighten the farce, or to deepen the pathos.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263700">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scriptural Testament in &#039;The Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[On &quot;glosing&quot; and scriptural authority in WBP, WBT, FrT, and SumT.  The groping motif of SumT is informed by Gen. 24:1-4 and 47:27, requiring an oath on the genitals.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275299">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scudamour&#039;s Practice of &quot;Maistrye&quot; upon Amoret.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Associates Scudamour of Edmund Spenser&#039;s The Fairie Queene IV.x with &quot;Chaucerian&quot; mastery in love, drawing parallels with love in KnT and contrasts with love in FranT, the latter quoted by Spenser in III.i.25, 8-9.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276570">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sea Voyages in Medieval Romances: Symbolic Trails through Existential Experiences and Female Suffering on the Water.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Suggests that in medieval literature generally the &quot;motif of crossing a body of water was regularly perceived as an epistemological operation of a physical and a spiritual kind,&quot; and explores the notion in several narratives, including MLT, examining how sea travel tests and affirms protagonists&#039; firmness of character and devotion.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268806">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Searching for a Medievalist : Some (Generally Positive) News About the State of Chaucer Studies]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Characterizes the &quot;scholarly interests&quot; of the more than 150 applicants for a 2003 tenure-track job in medieval studies at Hunter College of the City University of New York.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265839">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Second International Conference of the Spanish Society for Medieval Language and Literature]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[For individual essays that pertain to Chaucer,  of this volume.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273340">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Second Meanings in Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Knight&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores the thematic implications of several verbal ambiguities or double meanings in KnT:  &quot;array&quot; (dress and predicament), &quot;hert&quot; (heart and hart), &quot;wele&quot; (joy and wheel), nuances of &quot;turne,&quot; &quot;boone&quot; (reward and bone), and &quot;righte way&quot; in emotional and geographical senses,]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276687">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Second Thoughts on C. S. Lewis on Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Troilus.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Responds to criticism of TC, especially that of C. S. Lewis on courtly love, and examines the poem&#039;s emphases on human vulnerability and limitations, reinforced by recurrent colloquialisms, juxtapositions of the sublime and the risible, and concern with the &quot;contingent, fortuitous character of ordinary life.&quot; Attends to the lovers&#039; struggles in dealing with worldly contingencies, supplanted in the final stanzas with spiritual distancing from the material world.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265970">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Secrecy and Confession in Late Medieval Narrative: Gender, Sexuality, and the Rhetorical Subject]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Secrecy about sex cuts across genres and develops its own forms of rhetoric, as seen in works from Petrarch&#039;s &quot;Secretum&quot; through the &quot;Roman de Silence,&quot; Margery Kempe, and PardPT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272515">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Secrecy and Fear in Confessional Discourse: Subversive Strategies, Heretical Inquisition, and Shifting Subjectivities in Vernacular Middle English and Anglo-French Poetry]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reflects on secrecy and fear in confessional moments in several works, including TC.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274597">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Secretary &quot;a&quot; in Ellesmere&#039;s Latin Quotations.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Traces the use of the minuscule &quot;a&quot; in the Latin quotations of the Ellesmere manuscript to support the argument that these annotations derive from the ways Chaucer imagines the form of CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>