<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268558">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hooked-g Scribes and Takamiya Manuscripts]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Offers a &quot;new listing of the hooked-g group of scribes&quot; and attributes Takamiya MS 24 and two Takamiya fragments (MS 30 and single leaf from Plimpton MS) to the more specific &quot;slanted hooked-g scribe,&quot; also responsible for Cambridge, Trinity College R.3.3; Oxford, Bodleian Library, Lyell 31; London, Lambeth Palace Library MS 256; and other portions of the Plimpton MS. Other distinctive features include violet ruling and frame, large format, gothic minuscule headings and running titles, and an identifiable spelling system.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[2004]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268557">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A New Scribe of Chaucer and Gower]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The scribe of British Library MS Harley 1758 (a copy of CT) also executed London, Society of Antiquaries 134, which includes Gower&#039;s &quot;Confessio Amantis&quot; and works by Lydgate, Hoccleve, and John Walton. The two manuscripts were produced in the West Midlands, the result of &quot;provincial production.&quot; The scribe is the fifth to be identified as copyist of works by both Chaucer and Gower.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268556">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Piers Plowman Manuscript by the Hengwrt/Ellesmere Scribe and Its Implications for London Standard English]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Attributes Trinity College, Cambridge, MS B.15.17 (which includes the B-text of &quot;Piers Plowman,&quot; Richard Rolle&#039;s &quot;Form of Living,&quot; and a devotional poem) to the Hengwrt/Ellesmere scribe (Scribe B), summarizing and illustrating the graphetic features of his hand.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Spelling features of the manuscript parallel those of Hengwrt and Ellesmere, indicating that such features are idiosyncratic rather than evidence of a rising standard. The scribe (like Scribe D) was probably a &quot;full-time&quot; textwriter or a freelance scribe.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268555">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The World of Chaucer : Medieval Books and Manuscripts. Catalogue and Exhibition of Manuscripts and Early Printed Books from Glasgow University Library, Held at the Hunterian Museum 15 May to 28 August 2004]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Brief discussion of six Chaucerian books and twenty-five related works, with a highly selective bibliography. For an expanded version, see http://special.lib.gla.ac.uk/exhibns/chaucer/index.html (May 19, 2005).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268554">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Fifteenth-Century Owners of Chaucer&#039;s Work : Cambridge, Magdalene College MS Pepys 2006]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Pepys MS 2006 contains a unique grouping of Mel, ParsT, Truth, and Scog. Written by two scribes, it displays the names of John Kyriell (gentry) and William Fettyplace (London mercer). The two social classes of Kyriell and Fettyplace indicate either a broadening of the readership of Chaucer&#039;s works or a decline in the status of his readers.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268553">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower in the Delamere Chaucer Manuscript]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Edwards comments on several features of Takamiya MS 32, which &quot;provides the only significant narrative conjunction of the works of Chaucer and Gower&quot;: quire numbering and arrangement of materials indicate that the Gower material was &quot;selected by the prospective purchaser&quot; and that the production of the manuscript was &quot;unsystematic.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[2004]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268552">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Two Professional Readers of Chaucer and Langland : Scribe D and the HM 114 Scribe]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Bowers describes the habits and activities of the two scribes, assessing what such factors can tell us about the scribes&#039; careers and early fifteenth-century book production. Scribe D reflects &quot;commercial opportunism&quot; in producing works by prestige poets (Chaucer and Gower); the HM 114 scribe anticipates a later tendency to serve a civic rather than aristocratic clientele. The article also comments on fifteenth-century readership of Chaucer and Langland and on the role of HM 114 in the textual tradition of TC.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268551">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Text of Chaucer&#039;s Parson&#039;s Tale in Bodleian Library MS Arch. Selden B.14 : A Comparison of the Variants with B. L. MS Lansdowne 851]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Aita compares textual variants of ParsT in the Selden MS with British Library MS Lansdowne 851, showing how scribes attempted to clarify meaning by altering vocabulary and syntax.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268550">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Troilus and Criseyde]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[An edition of TC, with on-page glosses, explanatory notes at the end of the text, a glossary, and a selected bibliography. Includes a table of correspondences between TC and Boccaccio&#039;s &quot;Filostrato,&quot; plus a chronology of Chaucer&#039;s life and writings. The introduction considers source relations, dating, genre and structure, implied audience, and themes of freedom, gender, and epistemology.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268549">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Leaning on Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Wheeler reproduces and describes two versions of a sketch by Edward Burne-Jones, representing Chaucer embracing Burne-Jones and William Morris (the producers of the Kelmscott Chaucer). Includes an 1890 photograph of the Kelmscott duo and related materials.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[2004]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268548">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Editing as Palinode : The Invention of Love and The Text of the Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comments on the critical reception of Manly and Rickert&#039;s &quot;The Text of the Canterbury Tales&quot; (1940), exploring underlying assumptions about textual theory and gender politics. Uses Tom Stoppard&#039;s play &quot;The Invention of Love&quot; (1997) to reveal perspectives that underlie the praise of Manly&#039;s work and the occlusion of Rickert&#039;s.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268547">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Cuentos de Canterbury]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Spanish translation of CT, with introduction and explanatory notes.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268546">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Miller&#039;s Tale on CD-ROM]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Includes interlinked images and transcriptions of all fifty-eight pre-1500 versions of MilPT, with complete collations (linked to variant maps), commentaries on family relationships of the versions, and stemmatic commentary on key readings.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The search engine enables comparisons by spelling, word, line, witness, and complex combinations. Includes full descriptions of all witnesses and scribes (by Mosser), fully lemmatized databases of all spellings and words, and a bibliography.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268545">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[John Stow and Thomas Speght as Editors of Chaucer: A Question of Class]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Despite his expertise, Stow was not associated directly with Speght&#039;s 1598 edition. Speght &quot;was able to ornament the edition with the names of his eminent friends,&quot; while Stow, lacking class, continued behind the scenes, providing &quot;barrowloads of facts.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268544">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Canterbury Tales and the Rosary : A Mirror of Caxton&#039;s Devotions?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Needham documents the prominence of beads in nineteen of the twenty-three woodcuts in Caxton&#039;s second edition of CT. Suggests that the illustrations were influenced by the &quot;expanding cult of rosary devotions&quot; in Caxton&#039;s time and describes the history of such devotions. Reproduces all of the woodcuts.]]></dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:date><![CDATA[2004]]></dcterms:date>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268543">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[John Stow (1525-1605) and the Making of the English Past : Studies in Early Modern Culture and the History of the Book]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Fifteen essays explore the life and legacy of John Stow, the sixteenth-century author of Survey of London (1598) and the editor of the 1561 edition of Chaucer. For four essays that pertain to Chaucer, search for John Stow (1525-1605) under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268542">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[John Stow and Middle English Literature]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considers the texts Stow used in his career. His 1561 edition of Chaucer is marked less by its engagement with Chaucer than by the inclusion of Lydgate&#039;s &quot;Siege of Thebes.&quot; The evidence of Stow&#039;s annotations suggests interest in Lydgate but a surprising lack of &quot;sustained interest&quot; in Chaucer.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268541">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Stow&#039;s Books Bequeathed : Some Notes on William Browne (1591-c. 1643) and Peter Le Neve (1661-1729)]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Driver assesses &quot;Stow&#039;s pervasive intellectual influence on two later antiquarian readers of Chaucer.&quot; To Browne and Le Neve, Stow&#039;s edition was &quot;a highly regarded and trusted exemplar, used to supply omissions, correct errors, and add notes.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268540">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[In Search of Stow&#039;s Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Traces Stow&#039;s declining reputation among eighteenth- and nineteenth-century editors of Chaucer as well as a gradual revival of appreciation of Stow&#039;s edition, first among bibliophiles and later with modern Chaucerians. Dane examines the variants in imprints of Stow&#039;s edition and how these variants are cataloged in the STC. Includes facsimiles of two different title pages from the 1561 edition.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268539">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[&#039;New Corn from Old Fields&#039; : The Auctor and Compilator in Fourteenth-Century English Literature]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Caie argues that modern editions of medieval texts ought to be accompanied by the glosses that accompany them in the manuscripts. He discusses Chaucer&#039;s glosses to CT, as well as his use of the humility topos. The glosses to CT may be Chaucer&#039;s own, and electronic editions can make them readily available.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268538">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Critical, Scientific, and Eclectic Editing of Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines several key terms in textual/editorial theory, exploring their application to various editions of Chaucer--Skeat&#039;s edition, Pollard&#039;s Globe edition, and editions by Zupitza, Koch, Manly and Rickert, and Robinson. The terms are used inconsistently, but Skeat&#039;s &quot;best-text method tempered with a slight sprinkling of eclecticism&quot; and common sense has proved most influential.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268537">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and Deschamps, Translation and the Hundred Years&#039; War]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Wallace considers Eustace Deschamps&#039;s attitudes toward the English occupation of Calais and reads Deschamps&#039;s ballade 285 (which praises Chaucer) as a &quot;spirited act of reverse or returned colonization.&quot; Identifies parallels in the careers of Deschamps and Chaucer, plus the two writers&#039; relations with Oton de Granson.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268536">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Sons]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comments on Thomas and Lewis as Chaucer&#039;s sons and explores Astr as a didactic treatise, part of Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Macrobean&quot; development from &quot;literary study to moral inquiry.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268535">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Hack&#039;s Tale: Hunting the Makers of Media: Chaucer, Froissart, Boccaccio]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Hughes combines travelogue and appreciative criticism as he traces the lives and footsteps of Chaucer, Froissart, and Boccaccio, exploring what each author contributed to growth in popular literature. Focuses on Chaucer&#039;s life and CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268534">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Jobs]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s occupations--domestic servant, customs agent, justice of the peace, and clerk of the King&#039;s Works--shaped his literature, and his &quot;servility&quot; enabled him to become the &quot;father&quot; of English poetry. His biography and his works alike reveal &quot;submersion in the interests of power,&quot; so that the early complaints mythologize the &quot;ideal of the aristocratic good life&quot;; TC is an &quot;apology for the good life of erotic preoccupation&quot;; and CT gives voice to some dissidence, only to police and suppress it. Admirers and imitators of Chaucer emulated his servility and, in doing so, shaped his critical legacy.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>