<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266960">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love, &#039;That Knetteth Lawe of Compaignie&#039; in Troilus and Criseyde]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Traces Troilus&#039;s evolution toward an ever-higher understanding of cosmic Love.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266234">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love, &#039;Trouthe,&#039; and the Happy Ending of the &#039;Franklin&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Challenges the discussion of Angela M. Lucas and Peter J. Lucas (SAC 15 [1993], no. 215), arguing that the marriage of Dorigen and Arveragus &quot;is a poetic expression of freedom and love brought to life by the power of &#039;trouthe&#039;,&quot; a force so much greater than illusion that it converts the squire and the magician to &#039;gentilesse&#039;.  The source of the happy ending is in the way these virtues are presented by the Franklin.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274657">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love, History and Emotion in Chaucer and Shakespeare: &quot;Troilus and Criseyde&quot; and &quot;Troilus and Cressida.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Includes twelve essays by various authors and an introduction by the editors on affect, periodization, queer history, and Chaucer&#039;s and Shakespeare&#039;s versions of the story of Troilus and Criseyde/Cressida. For nine essays that pertain to Chaucer, search for Love, History and Emotion in Chaucer and Shakespeare under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261790">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love, Labor, and Sloth in Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Troilus and Criseyde&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer altered his source to make Troilus guilty of the sin of sloth, depicting him as one who dislikes &quot;love&#039;s work&quot; and who rarely does it.  By exploring this concept of sin in a courtly context, Chaucer shifts the moral focus of his work, causing Troilus to shoulder some of the guilt for his failed relationship with Criseyde.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270900">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love, Labor, Liturgy: Languages of Service in Late Medieval England]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Knowles views deployments of the medieval concept of &quot;service&quot; (which encompassed an elaborate network of interpersonal and institutional relationships) in Langland, Julian of Norwich, and TC.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262509">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love, Marriage and Salvation in Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Book of the Duchess&#039; and &#039;Parlement of Foules&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The Aristotelian view that the marital relationship can involve friendship (found not in Augustine but in Aelred of Rievaulx and Thomas Aquinas) influenced Jean de Meun, translator of Aelred.  De Meun&#039;s treatment of the matter in &quot;Roman de la Rose&quot; leads to new analysis of BD and PF.  These works display a new &quot;triplet&quot;:  law of nature, marriage, and friendship, including love as salvation.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263406">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love, Marriage and Salvation in Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Book of the Duchess&#039; and &#039;Parlement of Foules&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Traces views of the medieval church and of Chaucer&#039;s sources for BD and PF.  Treats love based on reason, affection, and friendship in sources:  Aelred of Rievaulx, Jean de Meun, Thomas Aquinas, and Aristotle.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268122">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love, Marriage, and Law: Three Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[FranT raises problems rather than providing a solution in the Marriage Group. Like ClT, it poses &quot;a problematic marriage agreement&quot; at the outset; like MerT, it shows that disastrous consequences can result from introducing non-marital love into a marital relationship.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271454">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love, Marriage, Sex, Gender]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses how Chaucer deals with &quot;regulations and expectations of fourteenth-century Christianity,&quot; especially in relation to Chaucer&#039;s views on sex, virginity, gender, and marriage.  Focuses on BD, PF, TC, ClT, MerT, WBP, NPT, MilT, and PardT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263911">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love, Nature, and Law in the Poetry of Gower and Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comparing Chaucer with Gower, Collins explores the conflicts between love and Nature and Reason; the function of law; and imagery and metaphor.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272501">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love, Peraldus, and the Parson&#039;s Tale]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Echoes of Peraldus&#039;s notion of sin as &quot;amor inordinatus&quot; in the section of ParsT on contrition and confession, thought to have been adapted primarily from Pennaforte, suggest that the former&#039;s &quot;Summa de vitiis&quot; &quot;exerts a more significant influence on a larger part of the ParsT than previously understood.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265174">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love, Pity, and Reason in the &#039;Troilus&#039;: Chaucer&#039;s Debt to Dante]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Influenced by Dante, Chaucer&#039;s TC represents the &quot;dramatic interplay&quot; of three kinds of love:  &quot;the courtly, the natural, [and] the rational.&quot;  Chaucer departs from his sources, however, adapting the love of Troilus and Criseyde to an English, Christian audience.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262108">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love, Politics, and Plot in the Parlement of Foules&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The centrality of politics as a &quot;topos&quot; in PF may be argued from three different approaches:  historical, philosophical, and psychological.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272043">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love, Salvation and Order in the &#039;Libro de Buen Amor&#039; and &#039;The Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Studies how the movement from divine to mundane love is bridged by figural allegory in CT (especially PardPT) and in the Arcipreste&#039;s &quot;Libro de Buen Amor.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268605">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love, Sex and Marriage in the Middle Ages : A Sourcebook]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Anthology for teaching medieval ideas about love, sex, and marriage; includes modern translation of portions of Chaucer&#039;s works: PardT, WBP, and Buk.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264146">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love, Sex, and Marriage in the Merchant&#039;s and Franklin&#039;s Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In FranT marriage is idealized; in MerT it is a parody.  In FranT, Chaucer criticizes the contradictions of love; in MerT he creates love as a satire.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266237">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love, Troth, and Magnamity: The &#039;Weltanschauung&#039; of the Breton Lay for Marie de France to Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The world view of the Breton Lay, as conceived by Marie de France, changed little before 1400.  In FranT, Chaucer expands the genre with increased emphasis on passionate and &quot;egalitarian&quot; love in marriage, troth, and magnanimity, as solution to the marriage debate.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275666">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love&#039;s (and Law&#039;s) Illusions in Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Franklin&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines the concept of intent and the illusion that is the marriage between Dorigen and Arveragus in order to argue that the message is one not of equality in marriage but of the happiness gained when the woman submits to her husband&#039;s authority. When put in its legal context, the concept of mercy also proves to be an illusion.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274317">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love&#039;s Crack-up: &quot;The House of Fame.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses the theme of distorted love in HF, where &quot;love of self&quot; is depicted as replacing the ideal of &quot;&#039;commune profit,&#039; that is love for others and for the larger order of the universe&quot; held together by the &quot;great chain.&quot; Argues that courtly love must be &quot;reinstated as a way of getting back to the holier kind of love&quot; that is spiritual.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272343">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love&#039;s Fools: Aucassin, Troilus, Calisto and the Parody of the Courtly Love]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Defines &quot;courtly love&quot; and &quot;parody&quot; and examines three protagonists as parodic courtly lovers (Aucassin of the anonymous &quot;Aucassin and Nicolette,&quot; Troilus of TC, and Calisto of Fernando de Rojas&#039;s &quot;Celestina&quot;), assessing them in light of Northrup Frye&#039;s anatomy of mode, romance, and mimesis. Chaucer&#039;s Troilus is &quot;tragicomic,&quot; a &quot;sympathetic parody&quot; of the courtly lover and &quot;far removed from the hero of romance.&quot; He is &quot;essentially a high mimetic figure with tendencies to the low mimetic form,&quot; lacking the superior powers of expression characteristic of a true hero.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262157">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Love&#039;s Remedies: Palinodic Discourse in Renaissance Literature]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Consistent with Bakhtinian theory, the palinode as textual stratagem has complicated the interpretation of works from the classics through Stampa and Sidney.  The Griselda story as told by Boccaccio, Petrarch, and Chaucer demonstrates the role of palinodic writing; also treats Ret.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264259">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Lovers and Riders in Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Anelida and Aricte&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer often used the horse-and-rider image as a metaphor for sexual &quot;maistrie.&quot;  In Anel the image illustrates Arcite&#039;s failure to exercise mastery over either of his ladies, chafing like a restless horse in the service of Anelida while playing the tame beast to the New Lady.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266891">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Lovers and Their Critics: The Medieval Marriage and Sexuality Debates]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Although Christian marriage was well defined by theologians in the twelfth through the thirteenth centuries, the proper role of sexuality remained debatable, as shown in the west portal of Senlis Cathedral, in Jean de Meun&#039;s introduction of the subject into vernacular literature in Roman de la Rose, and in Chaucer&#039;s varying treatment in WBP and WBT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277613">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Loves Hete Celestial: Earthly and Divine Love in Chaucer&#039;s Poetry.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Clarifies the interdependence of romantic love and the ascent of the mind to God in medieval theology, philosophy, and Chaucer&#039;s works, especially HF, PF, LGW, and portions of CT. Argues that many of Chaucer&#039;s characters &quot;with specious critical reputations, such as the Wife of Bath, the Pardoner, Pandarus and Criseyde, may have more benevolent, Christian inclinations than previously supposed.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263829">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Lovesickness in &#039;Troilus&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The medieval medical view of love as materialistic, deterministic, and ethically neutral shapes the thematic development of TC.  In the first three books, Troilus, Pandarus, and Criseyde are patient, physician, and cure.  In bks. 4 and 5, Troilus&#039;s lovesickness transcends a material view of love and no longer &quot;determines&quot; his love.  Through &quot;amor hereos,&quot; Chaucer explores the consequences of man&#039;s dual nature.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>