<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265002">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[History and Form in the General Prologue to the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[The form of GP is descended from the genre of the rhetorical catalogue of types, represented in simpler form by the lists of trees and birds in PF.  In PF, the garden represents the world of timeless values and the catalogs the earth-bound realities; in GP the pilgrims are dressed according to their callings but located by class and wealth.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276594">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[History and Literature in the &quot;Nun&#039;s Priest&#039;s Tale&quot;: The Return of the Repressed.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that &quot;the discarded historical event&quot; of the Peasants&#039; Revolt &quot;surfaces&quot; in NPT &quot;not to record the cracks and crevices in the dwindling feudal system, but to participate in the bestialization and grotesquing of the 1381 insurgents and the trivialization of their rising and their cause.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266974">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[History and Memory in Chaucer&#039;s Troilus and Criseyde]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In TC, the layering of sources, authors, characters, and language produces a text that &quot;seeks consciously to exist in the present each time it is read.&quot; The complex acts of memory among the characters suggest that time is chaotic, yet a &quot;kind of collective memory&quot; draws the narrative into a universal present.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267481">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[History of European Literature]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comprehensive survey of European literatures, writers, genres, motifs, and themes, from Homer to contemporary figures and trends. J. Smith, &quot;Chaucer (c.1340-c.1400),&quot; pp. 142-46, describes Chaucer and his works, discussing him as a humanist and a man &quot;difficult to identify with any one culture: he embodied the transition between two ways of looking at the world.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271049">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[History of the Concept of Mind: Speculations about Soul, Mind and Spirit from Homer to Hume]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Includes a chapter entitled &quot;Mind and Soul in English from Chaucer to Shakespeare&quot; (pp. 245-78) that surveys the denotations and connotations of the words &quot;soul&quot; and &quot;mind,&quot; with examples drawn a range of authors, including Chaucer.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274422">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[History of the English Language: Selected Texts and Exercises.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Includes selections from GP (lines 1-42, 285-308, and 545-66) in Middle English, with interlinear glosses.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277326">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[History of the English Puppet Theatre.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A sweeping survey of puppets, puppeteering, puppet shows, and their cultural legacy in England. Surmises briefly (p. 52) that &quot;popet&quot; (Th 7.701) and &quot;popelote&quot; (MilT 1.3254) may evince knowledge of puppet performance in Chaucerian England, but also admits that the terms may have &quot;meant no more than a doll.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269868">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[History, Mission, and Crusade in the Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Together, Chaucer&#039;s two  references to the Alexandrian crusade in CT, along with his portrait of the Knight and depictions of Custance and the  Sultaness in MLT, expose similarities between missionary work and crusading. The Knight&#039;s participation in a pilgrimage thus endorses &quot;personal spiritual renewal&quot; as a greater good than seeking the religious conversion of others.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263029">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[History, Technical Style, and Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Treatise on the Astrolabe&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Written for &quot;Lyte Lowys&quot; (Chaucer&#039;s son), Astr is a concise, brilliant translation of Masha&#039;allah&#039;s &quot;De compositione et utilitate astrolabii.&quot;  Chaucer best displays his comprehension in his definitions of the equinoctial.  Although written for a ten-year-old, Astr reveals Chaucer&#039;s understanding of the functional workings of the astrolabe.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266075">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hoccleve and ... Feminism? Negotiating Meaning in &#039;The Regiment of Princes&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines the &quot;defense-of-women&quot; section near the end of           Hoccleve&#039;s &quot;Regiment&quot; (lines 5090-194) as a meditation on literary influence and the need for the poet to comment on political issues.  The defense alludes to the Wife of Bath and to Prudence of Mel, emulating Chaucer&#039;s attitudes toward proverbial wisdom and toward the need for poets to be conscious of audience reception when giving practical advice.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262081">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hoccleve and Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Hoccleve, a personal acquaintance of Chaucer, received personal instruction from Chaucer in the art of English poetry.  Hoccleve remains firmly subordinated to his master poet of imaginary worlds, but his distinctive strength is his being &quot;a poet of the non-imaginary worlds of public and private life.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276930">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hoccleve and the Logic of Incompleteness.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses the &quot;formal organising principle&quot; of Hoccleve&#039;s &quot;Series&quot; in light of that of CT (and LGW). Argues that CT is &quot;not just incomplete, but incompleteable&quot; (citing the additivity entailed in CYP), explaining it as Chaucer&#039;s response to the conditions of the material production of his work and the inevitability of his own death. Hoccleve&#039;s &quot;Series&quot; is also &quot;variable and open-ended&quot; but its incompleteness is constrained by &quot;the way the text presents authorship.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266356">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hoccleve and the Middle French Poets]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Although Hoccleve&#039;s poetry is in many ways &quot;at a further remove than Chaucer from French formal models,&quot; some features of his verse suggest a &quot;closer affinity,&quot; especially the holograph manuscripts that can be seen as single-author &quot;collected poems.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266803">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hoccleve and the National Language]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Compares the multilingual conditions of late-medieval England with modern conditions in Korea, Kenya, and Quebec. Then argues that Hoccleve&#039;s poetic career resulted from Lancastrian encouragement of a national English language imitating Chaucer&#039;s model.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276928">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hoccleve&#039;&#039;s &quot;Series&quot; and the Unanticipated Woman Reader.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores Hoccleve&#039;s uses of and attitudes toward Christine de Pizan and Chaucer, focusing on Ovidian notions of female readership and how in his&quot;Series&quot; Hoccleve positions Pizan to &quot;speak back to Chaucer&quot; and &quot;asks us to reflect on the Chaucerian defence of poetic wit and fictive play, even as we remain alert to its potential risks and limits.&quot; Comments on the apology to women&quot; in ClT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263139">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hoccleve&#039;s Chaucer Portrait]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Hoccleve&#039;s request for a portrait (supplied in the Harley 4866 MS of &quot;The Regement of Princes&quot;) is something new:  the author&#039;s likenesses had heretofore been stylized.  Hoccleve&#039;s lines (4992-5012) place Chaucer in a holy or ecclesiastical setting.  Perhaps the impetus for realistic portraiture came from such royal effigies as can be seen in Westminster Abbey.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272364">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hoccleve&#039;s Hands: The &#039;Mise-en-Page&#039; of the Autograph and Non-Autograph Manuscripts]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Compares Chaucer&#039;s and Hoccleve&#039;s manuscripts in terms of authorial control, contrasting the &quot;muddle of disparate exemplars&quot; of CT with Hoccleve&#039;s detailed attention to format. Specifically contrasts Hoccleve&#039;s &quot;mid-stanza paraph&quot; in his autograph manuscripts with the mid-stanza paraph&#039;s complete absence from manuscripts of TC in the same period.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265469">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hoccleve&#039;s Independence from Chaucer: A Study of Poetic Emancipation]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys the reception of Hoccleve&#039;s poetry and argues that its &quot;autobiographical self-presentation&quot; underlines its differences from Chaucer&#039;s influential precedent.  Hoccleve also introduces innovative themes and topics:  madness, alienation, and various biographical and topical concerns.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270445">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hoccleve&#039;s Regement of Princes: The Poetics of Royal Self-Representation]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that the autobiographical portion of Hoccleve&#039;s &quot;Regement of Princes&quot; and its &quot;praise and portrait&quot; of Chaucer indicate that the poem is part of a broader &quot;program of kingly self-representation&quot; undertaken by Henry, Prince of Wales, who sponsored Hoccleve.  Includes analyses of the visual and verbal representations of Chaucer in Hoccleve&#039;s poem, focusing on historical contexts.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267977">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hoccleve&#039;s Regiment of Princes : Counsel and Constraint]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Perkins examines the narrative strategies Hoccleve adopts--advisor, servant, court outsider, autobiographer, moralist, petitioner--as responses to the politically charged context of &quot;Lancastrian poetry.&quot; This study identifies the political context in which Hoccleve wrote and assesses how he negotiated this context in his mirror for princes addressed to Henry IV, with recurrent attention to the influences of Gower, Lydgate, and especially Chaucer. Also discusses Hoccleve&#039;s portrait of Chaucer.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273826">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hoccleve&#039;s Supposed Friendship with Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reads Hoccleve&#039;s references to Chaucer as evidence of conventional respect for the older poet&#039;s work, rather than evidence of a personal relationship.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273053">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hoccleve&#039;s Take on Chaucer and Christine de Pizan: Gender, Authorship, and Intertextuality in the &#039;Epistre au dieu d&#039;Amours,&#039; the &#039;Letter of Cupid,&#039; and the &#039;Series&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Emphasizes Chaucer&#039;s influences on Hoccleve, paying special attention to ClT as an intertext with Hoccleve&#039;s &quot;Letter,&quot; where Hoccleve  appears rather misogynist. Yet, in the &quot;Series,&quot; harkening back to his &quot;Letter,&quot; Hoccleve seems to ridicule his earlier misogyny.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275674">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hoccleve&#039;s Tale: &quot;La male regle&quot; and the &quot;Canterbury Tales.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Points out thematic parallels between Hoccleve&#039;s &quot;Male regle&quot; and PardT, such as &quot;riot and repentance&quot; and &quot;misreading&quot; of &quot;the material and the spiritual,&quot; and argues that Hoccleve succeeds in taking in Chaucerian literary resources to make his original literary achievement with unique autobiographical inclination.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273308">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hoccleve&#039;s Tribute to Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Contends that &quot;there is no clear, indisputable evidence&quot; of a personal relationship between Chaucer and Thomas Hoccleve in the latter&#039;s &quot;Regement of Princes.&quot; His praise of Chaucer in that poem is evocative but generally conventional, and there is &quot;not a shred of evidence in non-literary sources.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261574">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Hochon&#039;s Arrow: The Social Imagination of Fourteenth-Century Texts]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[An introduction and seven essays explore the mutual contingency of history and literature in late-medieval England.  The collection interprets historical texts for contemporary attitudes and ideologies, discovering, for example, the &quot;carnivalesque&quot; in reports of the so-called Peasants&#039; Revolt of 1381 and varieties of factionalism in petitions and charters. Includes appendixes on the accusations brought against Thomas Austin and on liveries, the first by A. J. Prescott.<br />
For individual essays that pertain to Chaucer, search for Hochon&#039;s Arrow under Alternative Title.  ]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>