<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266947">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Contrasting Masculinities in the &#039;Shipman&#039;s Tale&#039; : Monk, Merchant, and Wife]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Compares ShT with &quot;Decameron&quot; 8.1 to assess the negative and positive characteristics of masculinity portrayed in the monk and merchant of the Tale. The wife is given traits identified with men in the Middle Ages, perhaps because of the Tale&#039;s original assignment to the Wife of Bath.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261259">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Contributions to a Chaucer Word-Book from Troilus Book IV]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A word list from TC 4 shows that Chaucer invented new meanings by combining previously unconnected root words; however, someone else may have introduced those roots into the language.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263592">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Controlled Partial Confusion: Concentrated Imagery in &#039;Troilus and Criseyde&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[William Empson writes of the concentrated imagery and controlled partial confusion in TC.  In book 5, Chaucer manipulates the imagery of the voyage, star-steer, sun-son, etc., to bring the poem to its climax, wherein the narrator cannot indict Criseyde because she is the poetic means by which Chaucer has steered the way.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267988">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Controlling Clothes, Manipulating Mates: Petruchio&#039;s Griselda]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Jasper examines Petruchio&#039;s use of clothing as a form of gender control in Shakespeare&#039;s The Taming of the Shrew, comparing it with similar uses of clothing in versions of the Griselda story-Boccaccio&#039;s, Petrarch&#039;s, ClT, and John Phillips&#039;s &quot;The Commody of Pacient and Meeke Grissill&quot; (1565).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269584">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Controlling the Loathly Lady, or What Really Frees Dame Ragnelle]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[As an example of popular folk narrative, &quot;The Wedding of Sir Gawain and Dame Ragnelle&quot; is flexibly open to multiple interpretations. Addressed to an elite audience, Gower&#039;s &quot;Tale of Florent&quot; and WBT lay claim to authority and function as exempla.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266701">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Controversy and Criticism: Lydgate&#039;s &#039;Thebes&#039; and the Prologue to &#039;Beryn&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Treats &quot;Thebes&quot; and the Prologue to &quot;Beryn&quot; (here called &quot;The Canterbury Interlude&quot;) as &quot;efforts to write what Chaucer had left unwritten&quot; and to confront contemporary controversies.  Lydgate&#039;s work rebukes those who would critique monasticism and diminish the status of Saint Thomas a Becket.  The &quot;Beryn&quot; Prologue (and the two-way journey of the Northumberland manuscript in which it appears) asserts orthodox acceptance of pilgrimage in the face of contemporary Lollard challenges.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276327">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Controversy in Literature: Fiction, Drama, and Poetry, with Related Criticism.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[An introduction to the study of literature for classroom use, arranged by literary mode and focused thematically on social, religious, and literary controversies. Includes a section titled &quot;Medieval and Modern Chaucer&quot; (pp. 457-81) that raises questions about reading Chaucer in Middle English or in modern translation, reprints a selection from Nevill Coghill&#039;s 1958 comments about translating Chaucer, and presents facing-page versions of WBT: F. N. Robinson&#039;s 1957 edition and Coghill&#039;s modern verse translation.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264352">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Convention and Authority: A Comment on Some Recent Critical Approaches to Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Modern critical theory demonstrates the radically traditional closed systems of medieval poetry.  In his negative examples and examples of abuse and falsification, especially in TC, Chaucer is also aware of what the classical tradition &quot;is not.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276827">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Convention and Individuality in Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Complaint of Mars.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Compares Mars with the &quot;Ovide moralisé&quot; and examines its adaptations of the &quot;aubade, the complaint, the Valentine-tradition (Gower and Graunson), and the conventions of courtly love&quot;--as inflected by Chaucer&#039;s own concerns and &quot;personality,&quot; and &quot;expressing an attitude toward young lovers&quot;: &quot;now joy, now sorrow, always fascination to see their &#039;busynesse&#039; . . . amusing or pathetic or both together in basing their lives on so unstable a foundation.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273238">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Convention and Innovation: Two Essays on Style in the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Treats KnT as a traditional, conservative work, elevated in tone and style and dependent on &quot;French and Italian traditions of eloquence.&quot; Conversely GP is the &quot;most original of Chaucer&#039;s poems,&quot; innovative in its &quot;mingling&quot; of &quot;praise and blame&quot; within individual portraits and enriched by the &quot;ironic alternation of opposed traditions of representation.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261623">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Convents, Courts and Colleges: The Prioress and the Second Nun]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses Chaucer&#039;s women and their relations with pilgrimage and learning.  The Wife of Bath rebels against her husband&#039;s book of wicked wives.  The Prioress tells of a boy&#039;s eschewing his primer in order to sing a hymn he does not understand from the Antiphoner.  The Second Nun is well read in the Golden Legend and in Dante&#039;s use of St. Bernard.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271865">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Convergent Approaches to Medieval English Language and Literature]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Collection of essays presented at the 22nd International Conference of the Spanish Society for Mediaeval English Language and Literature (SELIM), seeking new perspectives on medieval language study. For two essays pertaining to Chaucer, search for Convergent Approaches to Medieval English Language and Literature under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270763">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Converging of Traditions and Usability of the Short Story: Orality and Frame in the Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines the influence of the frame narrative tradition on CT, particularly on Chaucer&#039;s use of the &quot;narratio brevis&quot; genre. Also published in Bulletin of the Japanese Association of the History of the English Language n.v. (2009): 31-43.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264014">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Conversational Noncooperation: The Case of Chaucer&#039;s Pardoner]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In his shameless self-revelation the Pardoner confuses and angers his audience by mixing boasting and confiding with their contrary expectations of approval and mitigated disapproval.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269524">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Convocational and Compilational Play in Medieval London Literary Culture]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Bahr explores parallels between manuscripts as compilations and groups of people as affinities in late medieval London. Chaucer in CT and Gower in Confessio Amantis differ in how they conceive of literary and social organization.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261490">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Copy-Text and Its Variants in Some Recent Chaucer Editions]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines the use and misuse of W. W. Greg&#039;s term &quot;copy-text&quot; in recent editions of Chaucer and in the Kane-Donaldson Piers Plowman.  Confusions among &quot;copy-text,&quot; &quot;base text,&quot; and &quot;best text&quot; will be alleviated only when editors use the terms accurately and consistently.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269322">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Copying and Conflation in Geoffrey Chaucer&#039;s Treatise on the Astrolabe: A Stemmatic Analysis Using Phylogenetic Software]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Applies a technique from evolutionary biology - phylogenetic &quot;neighborhood-joining&quot; - to the witnesses to the text of Astr to produce a stemma, test the fragments and sections of longer versions against the stemma, and discuss the scribal conflation of various versions in their own productions. Concludes by commenting on scribes&#039; concern with completeness of the text.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/276472">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Copying and Reading &quot;The Prick of Conscience&quot; in Late Medieval England]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses medieval scribal transmission and commercial book production in relation to the surviving copy of &quot;The Tale of Beryn&quot; and the &quot;Beryn-Scribe.&quot; Examines the reception and transmission of the &quot;Prick of Conscience&quot; in late medieval England. References Chaucer throughout, with specific connections with CT and TC.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263640">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Corn and Shrimps: Chaucer&#039;s Mockery of Religious Controversy]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Treats themes of predestination, Lollardy, and priestly celibacy in CT and TC.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264253">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Corporeal and Spiritual Homocide, the Sin of Wrath, and the &#039;Parson&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses the canon-law tradition and the sources of ParsT 565-69 but concludes that &quot;the question of Chaucer&#039;s learning on this subject...must remain unanswered.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269607">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Corpses and Cogitos and the Sympathetic Self: Exhuming Sovereignty and Its Sympathetic Subjects]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In a larger investigation of the philosophical concept of sympathy, Lopez discusses the lack of sympathy, both personal and spatiotemporal, between May and January in MerT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/265997">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Corpus chaucerien et corporelite des vertus. Le MS Cambridge Gg 4.27(1)]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Although the manuscript is a typical instance of &quot;compilatio&quot; and unification (e.g., punctuation of ParsT), the virtues portrayed to illustrate ParsT do not belong to a typical iconographic program.  After identifying the three virtues with two saints (Charite and Abstinence with Elizabeth, Chastete with Margaret), Bourgne re-evaluates the possible provenance of the Chaucerian collection, arguing in favour of a tie with Jacqueline de Hainaut.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269729">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Corrected Mistakes in Cambridge University Library MS Gg.4.27]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Kato assesses the accuracy of the text of CT that appears in Cambridge University Library MS Gg.4.27. Quantifies and categorizes the scribe&#039;s errors, paying particular attention to the mistakes that the scribe himself corrected.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/267548">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Corrective Notes on the Structures and Paper Stocks of Four Manuscripts Containing Extracts from Chaucer&#039;s Canterbury Tales]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Proposes quire structures for four paper manuscripts, focusing on watermarks and commenting on implications of the proposed structures. Assesses British Library MS Arundel 140 (Ar); British Library MS Harley 2382 (Hl3); Magdalene College, Cambridge MS Pepys 2006 (Pp); and British Library MS Sloane 1009 (Sl3).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272431">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Correspondencia de Prominencia en las Canciones Inglesas. Una Perspectiva Histórica]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Diachronic study of how the linguistic stress matches metrical strong positions in spoken poetry and songs of the Middle and early modern English periods, including discussion of Chaucer&#039;s works. Prominent mismatches are more frequent in earlier songs because of phonological, rather than metrical, factors.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>