<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272998">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Scribal Authorship and the Writing of History in Medieval England]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Focuses on the role of authorship within the scribal process, and emphasizes &quot;intertextuality&quot; as an important facet of medieval historiography.  Briefly discusses how Chaucer &quot;de-authorizes&quot; Adam Scriveyn&#039;s work, yet reveals his own authorship in Ret.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272997">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[What&#039;s It Worth? Selling Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039; in the Twentieth Century]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines patterns, trends, and values of private and public collections of Chaucer manuscripts sold in the twentieth century.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272996">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Sociable Text of the &#039;Troilus Frontispiece&#039;: A Different Mode of Textuality]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that the Frontispiece of the 1420 manuscript of TC (Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, MS 61) demonstrates a medieval tradition   of textuality that is not only oral and aural but social, and an example of group textuality in which words and illustrations act as &quot;instigator and participant.&quot; Invoking the scholarship of A. J. Minnis and the medieval testimony of Geoffrey of Vinsauf and of Alan of Lille, considers such issues as &quot;intentio auctoris&quot;, the nature of acts of perception, and, briefly, other medieval modes of textuality.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272995">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Caxton&#039;s Editing of the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Compares the first and second editions of Caxton&#039;s CT. Using digital tools to collate the first and second editions, finds that Caxton not only added and removed  lines, but made over 3,000 changes based on a manuscript source that was closer to the textual tradition than his source for the first edition. Includes three appendices:  A lists variants for SqT; B provides the number of &quot;significant changes&quot; made to each tale; C lists extant manuscripts.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272994">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The London Book-Trade and the Lost History of &#039;Piers Plowman&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Within this larger comprehensive study of &#039;Piers Plowman&#039; in  Aberystwyth, National Library of Wales, MS 733B (N), the authors note that Chaucer&#039;s scribe, Adam Pinkhurst, may have made scribal corrections to the B-text copy M (London, British Library, Add. MS 35287). This claim has been supported by Simon Horobin in &quot;Adam Pinkhurst and the Copying of British Library, MS Additional 35287 of the B Version of Piers Plowman&quot; (2009).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272993">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The &#039;1689 Chaucer&#039;: A Reissue of the Last Black-Letter Chaucer Edition]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Uses personal copy for close comparison with 1687 edition, and views book history as evidence of increasing inability to decode Middle English and the beginning of antiquarianism and collectable Chaucer.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272992">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer in Denmark: A Study of the Translation and Reception History, 1782-2012]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Provides comprehensive study of reception and translation of Chaucer&#039;s works in Denmark from the late eighteenth century to 2012. Study reveals cultural changes and links between Denmark and England, and provides analysis of current Chaucerian scholarship and teaching in Denmark.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272991">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Early Printed Chaucer Editions in the Harry Ransom Center&#039;s George A. Aitken Collection]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Catalogues Chaucer resources at the Ransom Center at the University of Texas at Austin and focuses on Aitken as collector.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272990">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Interview with Robert D. Fulk]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Fulk extols two collaborative editions of Chaucer for their excellent textual editing: The Variorum  Chaucer by Ruggiers and Ransom, and Benson&#039;s Riverside Chaucer; additionally, praises Peter Robinson&#039;s digital  Canterbury Tales Project. Warns against &quot;complacency&quot; in the face of increasing manuscript digitization, and recommends the Middle  English Grammar Corpus, by Merja Stenroos et al., as a worthy instance of such encoding for scholarly use.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272989">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Editing and Correcting]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses the importance of &quot;corrections&quot; in Middle English manuscripts. In particular, addresses scribal errors and corrections in the Ellesmere and Hengwrt manuscripts.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272988">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Variants vs. Variance]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Looks at distinction between &quot;scribal variation&quot; and &quot;authorial revision&quot; in medieval texts. Includes specific discussion of CT and TC.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272987">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[New Challenges to the Editing of Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considers that editing the &quot;multilayered text&quot; of CT requires a combination of different methodologies, including codicology, textual evidence, and computer-based evidence, in order to restructure and represent Chaucer&#039;s true authorial intentions.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272986">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Probable Truth: Editing Medieval Texts from Britain in the Twenty-First Century]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Collection of essays that discuss emerging challenges for scholars and editors in textual studies. For essays pertaining to Chaucer, search for Probable Truth under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272985">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Essays on Aesthetics and Medieval Literature in Honor of Howell Chickering]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Collection of  essays celebrating the teaching and varied scholarship of Howell &quot;Chick&quot;  Chickering. For essays pertaining to Chaucer, search for Essays on Aesthetics and Medieval Literature under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272984">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[&#039;Troilus and Criseyde&#039; and the Modes of Beauty]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses TC&#039;s &quot;moral allegory and fictional realism&quot; using a Kantian aesthetic lens. Focuses on the aesthetics of desire, as well as the rhythm, imagery, and mode of the poem.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272983">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Women in Love: On the Unity of &#039;The Legend of Good Women&#039; and &#039;Troilus and Criseyde&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Addresses shared tropes, themes, and language of LGW and TC. Presents LGW not as a &quot;failed text&quot; in its incompleteness, but as a work that is &quot;grounded&quot; in the tragedy of TC and that anticipates the &quot;comedic narratives&quot; of CT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272982">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Doubling and the Thopas-Melibee Link]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines plot and language repetition and &quot;doublings&quot; in CT. Focuses on irony and ambiguity in Th-MelL and claims that both tales have an &quot;identical sentence&quot; and are &quot;the same story told twice. Also discusses MkT, NPT, and PrT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272981">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[&#039;His lady grace&#039; and the Performance of the Squire]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Studies over 15,000 occurences of n-stem and r-stem nouns in the &quot;Corpus of Middle English Verse and Prose,&quot; and uses  the information to assess &quot;his lady grace&quot; (GP 1.88) and the incoherences in the Squire&#039;s performance of &quot;chivalry,&quot; &quot;courtliness,&quot; and &quot;feudal duty.&quot; Claims that the Squire&#039;s incoherence resides both in his behavior and in the performativity he pursues.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272980">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Insatiable Wives: Women Eating Men and the Romantic Turn in the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores metaphors of eating, drinking, hunting, and food preparation, within the framework of the &quot;storytelling performances&quot; of the Wife of Bath in WBT and the unnamed Wife in ShT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272979">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Mood, Tense, Pronouns, Questions: Chaucer and the Poetry of Grammar]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Emphasizes Chaucers skillful and &quot;poetic&quot; use of grammar, with special attention  to nouns and pronouns in TC. Also addresses Chaucer&#039;s focus on rhetoric  and logic in GP and ClT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272978">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[&#039;A Definite Claim to Beauty&#039;: &#039;The Canterbury Tales&#039; in the Kelmscott Chaucer]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Discusses handcrafted production and aesthetic beauty of the Kelmscott Chaucer and responds to the question &quot;What constitutes &#039;beauty&#039; in medieval poetry?&quot; Provides historical background on the Kelmscott Press, the relationship between William Morris and Edward Burne-Jones, and the medieval craftsmanship that influenced the making of  the Kelmscott Chaucer.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272977">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Tale: 1386 and the Road to Canterbury.<br />
]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Biography of Chaucer that centers  on the events of 1386 when he left London for residence in Kent  and, by &quot;virtue of necessity,&quot; imagined a new audience for his poetry--the embedded audience of CT, depicted in GP. Explores social, civic, and political details of Chaucer&#039;s world and their relations with aspects  of his literature; describes the late medieval conditions of literary production and Chaucer&#039;s development as the &quot;founder of English letters.&quot;  Includes discursive notes and an index. Also published under the title &quot;The Poet&#039;s Tale: Chaucer and the Year that Made the &#039;Canterbury Tales&#039;&quot; (London: Profile, 2014).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272976">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Troilus and Criseyde,&#039; III, 890]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Suggests that Pandarus&#039;s phrase &quot;ye haselwodes shaken&quot; (TC 3.890) might be paraphrased as &quot;you offer food to pigs.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272975">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Tragedy of Arcite: A Reconsideration of the &#039;Knight&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that KnT is &quot;mainly about&quot; the tragedy of Arcite rather than the success of Palamon. The latter mistakes both the nature of Emelye and the rivalry of Arcite, who is a &quot;worthier&quot; man. Like Troilus, Arcite falls in fortune, and ultimately fails in his pursuit of chivalric love; together they comprise Chaucer&#039;s critique of &quot;medieval secular idealism&quot; insofar as they fail to achieve the ideal in this world.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272974">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and the Theme of Mutability]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes considerations of mutability from &quot;Antiquity Through the Middle Ages&quot; and then focuses on Chaucer&#039;s works, with individual sections that assess aspects of the theme in Chaucer&#039;s translations, his lyric poems, his dream visions, TC, KnT, and the &quot;Remainder&quot; of the CT. Considers several sub-themes: &quot;decay of the world, &#039;ubi sunt,&#039; mutability, mortality, contempt of the world [&#039;contemptus mundi&#039;], putrefaction,&quot; and &quot;the world in all its transitoriness,&quot; arguing that the theme is prevalent throughout Chaucer&#039;s career and that it helps to account for the &quot;tension and universality of his poetry.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>