<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273851">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Irony in Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Merchant&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Demonstrates the presence of three kinds of irony in MerT: verbal irony in the Merchant&#039;s double entendres and introductory comments on marriage, rhetorical irony in the deflation of courtly ideals by means of distorted or exaggerated figures and devices, and dramatic irony in the audience&#039;s awareness of what January recurrently fails to perceive. ]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273850">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Chaucerian Crux: &quot;Spiced Conscience,&quot; &quot;CT&quot; I(A) 526, III(D) 435.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores the meanings and implications of the phrase &quot;spiced conscience&quot; in Middle English and later English language history, arguing that in both the GP description of the Parson (1.526) and the Wife of Bath&#039;s admonition to her husband (WBP 3.435) the phrase means &quot;long-suffering sensibility,&quot; and adducing internal evidence and the English proverbial claim that beaten spice smells sweetly.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273849">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Middle English: Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A discursive review of Chaucerian scholarship and research published in 1966.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273848">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Commentary on the General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales. Second edition, with Additional Material and New Preface.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reprints the original version of 1948, with a very brief second preface (half page) and appended additional material and bibliography (pp. 317-28). Throughout the reprinted text, the additional material is signaled by means of daggers included in the text.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273847">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Unity and Duality in &quot;The Wife of Bath&#039;s Prologue&quot; and &quot;Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reads WBPT as concerned with the &quot;reconciliation of opposites that to human perception seem irreconcilable.&quot; WBP poses a range of oppositions dialectically (experience and authority, female and male, physical and metaphysical), resolving them through love and generosity. WBT &quot;stands as an exemplum&quot; which illustrates the reconciliation effected by generosity. The Wife is an &quot;agent of the Life Force.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273846">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[In Defense of the Summoner.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that the Summoner &quot;triumphs over&quot; the Friar in their tale-telling competition, revealing his greater intelligence and competence, but also indicating that his social success discloses a more fundamental &quot;malignancy and egotism.&quot; Compares the strategies of the two tale-tellers, exploring multiple ironies.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273845">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Of Time and Tide in the &quot;Franklin&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considers medieval knowledge of tidal patterns and details about astrology and the seasons in FranT to support the argument that the clerk of Orleans predicts rather than magically causes the rise of the sea, disguising the presence of the coastal rocks that threaten the Breton shore. The clerk&#039;s ruse of magic, its acceptance by others, and the Franklin&#039;s presentation undercuts the teller and the idea of &quot;gentilesse&quot; in the Tale.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273844">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[&quot;Franklin&#039;s Tale,&quot; F 1139-1151.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Adduces details from the Old French &quot;Floire et Blancheflor, Version 1&quot; as evidence that Chaucer&#039;s &quot;catalogue of magical accomplishments&quot; in FranT 5.1139-51 was commonplace, i.e., part of a well-known tradition, deployed by the Franklin to outdo the Squire.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273843">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Clerk&#039;s Prologue and Tale from The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Presents ClPT in Middle English (based on Robinson&#039;s 1957 edition), with notes and glossary at the end of the text, along with an appendix (pp. 91-99) that offers lines 4.813-924 of ClT in facing-page juxtaposition with one of its source texts, &quot;Le Livre Griseldis,&quot; in order to show &quot;Chaucer translating and reshaping French prose into English rhymed verse.&quot; The Introduction (pp. 1-8) comments on the place of ClT in the CT, Chaucer&#039;s style, and his treatment of traditional material.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273842">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s The Merchant&#039;s Tale, 1662.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Suggests that the phrase &quot;right of hooly chirche&quot; in MerT 4.1662 refers to a funeral rights, rather than a marriage blessing.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273841">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Merchant&#039;s Tale and Its Irish Analogues.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Anatomizes motifs in the sources and analogues of the pear tree episode in MerT, focusing on several modern Irish analogues that have details of characterization which parallel those in MerT and have an intervention by male and female fairies. Suggests that an early version of these Irish analogues may have influenced Chaucer while he was in service to Prince Lionel and his wife Elizabeth, heiress of Ulster and Connaught, perhaps while Lionel was royal viceroy in Ireland, 1361-66.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273840">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s &quot;The Wife of Bath&#039;s Prologue,&quot; 175.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Offers Dante&#039; s use of whips in &quot;Purgatorio&quot; as an analogue to the Wife of Bath&#039;s image of &quot;whippe&quot; in WBP 3.175.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273839">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Paths of Poetry: Twenty-Five Poets and Their Poems.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[A series of literary portraits, each combining biography and appreciative criticism. The section on Chaucer, entitled &quot;Founder of English Literature&quot; (pp. 17-31), emphasizes his careers in business and diplomacy, his poetic &quot;borrowings,&quot; and his social realism, especially in CT. Comments on each of Chaucer&#039;s major poems, with most attention given to selections from GP.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273838">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Perplexing Pardoner.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Suggests that interpretations of the Pardoner are overwrought, arguing that he acts &quot;perfectly in the character given him by his creator&quot; and that his somewhat troubling offer of relics to the Host is best understood as a joke.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273837">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Narrative Focus in &quot;The Book of the Duchess.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Treats the narrator-dreamer of BD as the poem&#039;s &quot;central character&quot; and a device of unity and dramatic irony. The character does not &quot;develop&quot; psychologically, but his polite good nature--comically limited by his ignorance of courtly idiom--enables Chaucer to affirm faith in the &quot;Christian doctrine of endurance&quot; in the face of fortune. The Black Knight does not escape the &quot;inefficacy&quot; of courtly sentiment.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273836">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Sir Thopas: The Bourgeois Knight, the Minstrel, and the Critics.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes and paraphrases Thop, focusing on its style, vocabulary, genre, and adaptation of conventions to show that a tension between &quot;the heroic and the bourgeois&quot; underpins much of the bathos of the Tale and its parodic impact.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273835">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Horse and Rider Figure in Chaucer&#039;s Works.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Comments on the prevalence of horse-and-rider imagery in Western culture, and explores Chaucer&#039;s uses of the imagery in BD (the hunt), TC (Bayard and Troilus&#039;s ride-bys), Wife of Bath (spurs, bridles, and other sexualized images), and various other contexts. Chaucer often &quot;deals with the tension inherent in the figure&quot; of the horse and rider and related imagery.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273834">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Dusting off the Cobwebs: A Look at Chaucer&#039;s Lyrics.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes the advantages of close reading of Chaucer&#039;s lyrics and shorter poems, examining ABC and Ros in detail for their riches of prosody, tone, structure, and meaning, with attention to narrative voice.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273833">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer and the Hand That Fed Him.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Documents the influence on WBPT, SumT, PardT, and, to a lesser degree, other parts of CT of the &quot;Communiloquium&quot; of John of Wales (or another fraternal compendium much like it), showing that a number of biblical, classical, and medieval quotations or allusions in Chaucer&#039;s works (and sometimes their manuscript glosses) are similar in wording, details, and sequence to those found in John&#039;s preaching manual. Establishes that Chaucer transformed &quot;anecdotes, sayings, and comments into poetry, using them to develop character, drama, and satire,&quot; and that he tapped into  his audience&#039;s familiarity with preaching friars and their devices.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273832">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Gower&#039;s Narrative Art.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[  <br />
Assesses Gower&#039;s virtues and achievements as a narrative poet rather than as a moralist in &quot;Confessio Amantis,&quot; occasionally comparing and contrasting his techniques and accounts with analogous ones by Chaucer. Considers the frame of LGW to be inferior to Gower&#039;s in the &quot;Confessio,&quot; which &quot;released&quot; Gower&#039;s narrative potential, much as the frame of CT did for Chaucer. Prefers Gower&#039;s accounts of Thisbe, Lucrece, and Philomela to those in LGW, but gauges Gower&#039;s tale of Florent, though successful, to be less sophisticated than WBT. <br />
]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273831">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Thy Drasty Rymyng . . . .]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys Chaucer&#039;s &quot;use of rhyme as it contributes to poetic effect,&quot; examining rhymes in his complaints and balades, in Anel, and in Tho, and demonstrating his unobtrusive dexterity with rhyme royal in TC and with decasyllabic couplets in CT. Emphasizes Chaucer&#039;s ease, versatility, and his &quot;freedom from system or repetitive form.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273830">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s Epistolary Style.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores Chaucer&#039;s &quot;reading and use&quot; of the genre of verse epistle, drawing on evidence from LGW, the two letters in TC, Scog, and Buk. Considers the influence of Ovid&#039;s &quot;Heroides&quot; and Horace&#039;s &quot;Satires&quot; to argue that Chaucer was adept in the Ovidian mode, influencing the amatory lyrics of his fifteenth-century followers, and, in Scog, the &quot;first English poet to master the essentials&quot; of the Horatian verse epistle.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273829">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Art of Chaucer: &quot;Pathedy.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Coins the term &quot;pathedy&quot; to describe Chaucer&#039;s &quot;serene middle ground&quot; between tragedy and comedy, applying the term to the &quot;quality of love&quot; that characterizes Troilus in TC and to the tragicomic contradictions and essential humanity of several of the Canterbury pilgrims--the Wife of Bath, the Pardoner, the Prioress, and more. In his art, Chaucer balances pathos and ridicule.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273828">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Arrangements of Two or More Attributive Adjectives in Chaucer (2), ]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Item not seen; no description available.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/273827">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Arrangements of Two or More Attributive Adjectives in Chaucer (1).]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes Chaucer&#039;s arrangements of multiple adjectives (preposed, postposed, and combined), contrasting his practice with other Middle English writers, and exploring the poetic value of his usage, suggesting that he seems to have been &quot;the writer richest in the device of arranging adjectives throughout the history of the English language.&quot; Continued in &quot;Arrangements of Two or More Attributive Adjectives in Chaucer (2),&quot; Kobe Miscellany 6 (1972): 13-31 [no Description available].]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>
