<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274226">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Neoplatonic Theodicy in Chaucer&#039;s &quot;Legend of Philomela.&quot; ]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses how the invocation to the &quot;yevere of the formes&quot; (2228ff.) that opens the &quot;Legend of Philomela&quot; in LGW contributes to the &quot;primary rhetorical effect&quot; of the legend, i.e.,&quot;secondary pathos.&quot; As an appeal to an absent god, the invocation, like the legend itself, evokes &quot;ineffectual sympathy&quot; for the female protagonists and &quot;outrage against the men, gods, and universe that would not respond.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274225">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Feminized Counsel: Representations of Women and Advice to Princes in Late Medieval England.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines &quot;the role of women in literary texts as counselors to kings&quot; in late medieval England, assessing works by Chaucer (LGW and Mel), John Gower, and Stephen Scrope.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274224">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The F or G Prologue Again: Is the &quot;Ballade&quot; a Clue?]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses several aspects of the &quot;ballade&quot; in LGWP to argue that the differences between the F and G versions of the interpolated poem (itself composed as a standalone lyric) indicate that the F version predates the G. ]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274223">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Negotiating Power: Authority and the Author in Chaucer&#039;s Prologue to the &quot;Legend of Good Women.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Uses Michel Foucault&#039;s notions of power, subversion, and discourse to argue that LGWP &quot;illustrates the medieval writer&#039;s relationship to hegemonic power&quot; and &quot;presents the potential ways authors are involved in the production and subversion of discourses.&quot; Includes an abstract in Turkish.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274222">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[A Japanese Translation of Geoffrey Chaucer&#039;s &quot;The Legend of Good Women&quot; (1).]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Translates into Japanese both F and G versions of LGWP, based on the Riverside edition, with an introduction and notes in Japanese.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274221">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Wan qi zhong gu ying wen xie zuo yu wen hua ji yi/ji yi&quot; [&quot;Late Middle English Writing and Cultural Memory/Translation&quot;]]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In Chinese; item not seen. The subject listings and the notes in the record of the online MLA International Bibliography indicate that the essay treats HF, &quot;Pearl,&quot; Lollard writing, and work(s) by George Herbert. The record also indicates that a summary in English is included in the journal.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274220">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Stellification and Poetic Ascent in the &quot;House of Fame.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Focuses on HF, 584–92, clarifying the meaning and implications of &quot;stellifye,&quot; arguing that the narrator&#039;s fear of stellification reflects Chaucer&#039;s concerns about social and poetic ascent, and describing how the allusion to Ganymede evokes a complex, sexualized representation of &quot;the possibilities and pitfalls engendered through [a] quest for poetic fame.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274219">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[&quot;Ekphrasis&quot; as Aesthetic Pilgrimage in Chaucer&#039;s &quot;House of Fame.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reads the description of the temple of Venus in HF in light of its literary sources and late medieval church ambulation, investigating how ideas of physical, aesthetic, and spiritual motion underlie the narrator&#039;s moving gaze. Includes five b&amp;w illustrations. ]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274218">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer&#039;s &quot;House of Fame&quot; and Its Boccaccian Intertexts: Image, Vision, and the Vernacular.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Analyzes Boccaccio&#039;s impact on Chaucer in HF. Presents literary history of Boccaccio&#039;s &quot;Amorosa vision&quot; and descriptions of Chaucer&#039;s trips to Italy, and claims that &quot;Chaucer tries out an array of Boccaccian approaches to Dantean questions and problems&quot; in HF.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274217">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Acerca de Chaucer&#039;s &quot;House of Fame.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Presents HF as a poetic and rhetoric reflection, as well as a reaction to the desire to have (versus the desire to be) and the belief in popular opinion (versus the belief in truth).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274216">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[&quot;Mind like Wickerwork&quot;: The Neuroplastic Aesthetics of Chaucer&#039;s House of Tidings.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reads the House of Rumor in HF as &quot;an echo object through which we can recover Chaucer&#039;s complex and dynamic view of human cognition.&quot; Reads the basket-like structure as Chaucer&#039;s &quot;uncanny&quot; anticipation of &quot;neuroplasticity,&quot; the &quot;capability of the brain to reorganize its neural circuitry in response to an external stimulus or a deficit in cognitive function.&quot; Emphasizes human volition in cognitive processes.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274215">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Enlisting Truth.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that medieval lists or catalogues point both to the necessary and to the excessive, and in doing so emphasize differing views of appropriate ownership and use of material goods. Includes brief mention of lists in HF and Form Age.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274214">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Memorialization in White: Chaucerian Topology and the &quot;Defaute&quot; of Subjectivity.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that &quot;Middle English &#039;defaute,&#039; signifying both lack and loss, characterizes the work of mourning&quot; in BD, considering the &quot;interplays between the poem&#039;s articulations of toponyms and its figurations of &#039;White&#039; as simultaneously a deceased body of feminine beauty and a virtual map of courtliness.&quot; Focuses on consolatory memorialization (by the Dreamer and the Black Knight) that employ the &quot;non-linear and non-geometric topology of time and space.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274213">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Mourning, Melancholia, and Masculinity in Medieval Literature.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Studies &quot;male bereavement in medieval literature,&quot; particularly &quot;the authenticity and affective nature of grief among aristocratic males&quot; in Chretién&#039;s &quot;Yvain,&quot; &quot;Trewe Man,&quot; &quot;Sir Orfeo,&quot; &quot;Pearl,&quot; and BD. In the latter, Chaucer expresses &quot;not universal understanding of another&#039;s grief, but universal understanding that loss and grief exist, and a plurality of understandings of what loss and grief are, why we suffer them, and how they feel.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274212">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[[The Idea of Love and Marriage in &quot;Book of the Duchesse.&quot;]]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses the combination of Christian marital ideals and secular courtly love in BD, arguing that the two are compatible in the poem. In Chinese, with English summary.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274211">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Translating Lady Philosophy: Chaucer and the Boethian Corpus of Cambridge, University Library MS Ii. 3. 21.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considers how the interrelated texts and glosses in CUL, MS Ii.III.21 depict in nuanced ways the gender of Lady Philosophy, focusing on Chaucer&#039;s emphasis in Bo of her &quot;norisschyng&quot; of Boethius as teacher, physician, and wet-nurse. While translating Boethius&#039;s &quot;Consolation of Philosophy&quot; (and aware of Nicholas of Trevet&#039;s and Jean de Meun&#039;s versions) Chaucer reiterates and magnifies the &quot;feminine and pedagogical&quot; aspects of Philosophy and the translation process.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274210">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Naming the Unnamed &quot;Philosofre&quot; in Chaucer&#039;s Prologue to the &quot;Treatise on the Astrolabe.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Maintains that the quoted maxim on friendship in Astr is misattributed to classical sources and actually comes from a twelfth-century medical treatise, &quot;Practica brevis,&quot; attributed to Johannes Platearius. While Chaucer may have seen the line in Platearius, he may have read it in an alchemical treatise. Argues that Chaucer&#039;s use of the phrase may indicate the adaptation of dedicatory rhetoric across scientific genres.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274209">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[John of Trevisa légitimise la traduction en langue anglaise (vers 1387).]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Describes John of Trevisa&#039;s ideas about translating scientific and religious texts from Latin into English, commenting on similarities among these ideas, Wycliffite theory of translation, and Chaucer&#039;s approach in Astr.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274208">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Performance, Memory, and Oblivion in the &quot;Parson&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores how memory functions in contrition and confession in ParsT.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274207">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Alchemical Satire in George Ripley&#039;s &quot;Compound of Alchemy&quot;: The Chaucerian Legacy]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Traces the influence of CYPT on the &quot;writings of late medieval alchemical works,&quot; focusing on George Ripley&#039;s &quot;Compound of Alchemy&quot; and discussing a variety of motifs, from alchemists&#039; attire and associations, to the jargon and dangers of alchemy, its negative affiliation with clergy, and its strategies of &quot;deception and secrecy.&quot; Includes an edition of the fifth &quot;Gate&quot; of the Compound.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274206">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Animal in Allegory: From Chaucer to Gray.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that the category of &quot;allegorical animal poems&quot; disguises the fact that such poems &quot;simultaneously hide and reveal the contested nature of the boundary between humans and animals.&quot; Comments on fable tradition, the nature of allegory, and various animal poems, including NPT and NPE, for the ways that they draw attention to the characters&#039; &quot;animality&quot; and connect allegorical meanings with &quot;the unstable divide between humans and animals.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274205">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Paratactic Structure in the &quot;Canterbury Tales&quot;: Two Antecedents of the Modern Short Story]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that Chaucer&#039;s innovations in CT &quot;announce the ulterior evolution of the modern short story,&quot; focusing on NPT and WBPT as &quot;unequivocal precursors&quot; to the modern genre in their techniques of representing time, space, characters, and narrators, and in the openness of their endings]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274204">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[The Nun&#039;s Priest&#039;s Identity and the Purpose of His Tale.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reconsiders questions of the number of Canterbury pilgrims, focusing on GP, 1.164 and the ecclesiastical pilgrims. Suggests that the Nun&#039;s Priest and the Clerk may be identical or, at least, kindred spirits, and considers what NPT and ClT may reveal about the tellers&#039; attitudes toward the Prioress.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274203">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Reading Chaucer&#039;s Monk&#039;s Tale.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that MkT models &quot;rumination,&quot; a reading method used by monks. Includes close reading of the form and content of specific lines. Also claims ABC as a model for monastic reading techniques because it is fragmented, repetitive, monologic, and circular (there is no sense of forward progress). ]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274202">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Chaucer on Wildness: The Host, the Monk, and the Tragedy of Cenobia.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Examines Chaucer&#039;s concepts of wild and wilderness in MkT and argues that the Monk&#039;s inclusion of Cenobia is in response to the Host&#039;s comments about his own wife. This exchange is a mediation on &quot;reccheless-ness,&quot; a wildness of character that can manifest both as virtue and as vice in an individual and the community.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>