<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269468">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Aurality]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Coleman clarifies differences between &quot;aurality&quot; and &quot;orality,&quot; assessing references to reading aloud and speaking aloud in Middle English texts, especially Chaucer&#039;s works, and citing depictions of such practice in manuscript illustrations, including two depictions from Chaucer: the Troilus frontispiece (Cambridge, Corpus Christi College 61) and an initial in Lansdowne 851 (British Library).]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/268670">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Aurelius&#039; Prayer, Franklin&#039;s Tale 1031-79: Sources and Analogues]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Chaucer modeled the prayer for the removal of the rocks on a cluster of literary precedents, from Boccaccio to Boethius, Ovid, and Marian lyrics. Chaucer was as interested in the works&#039; interpenetration as in the ironic tensions among them.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/264179">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Aurelius&#039; Quest for &#039;Grace&#039;: Sexuality and the Marriage Debate in the &#039;Franklin&#039;s Tale&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Sexual frustration during Arveragus&#039;s absence motivates Dorigen&#039;s verbal infidelity.  Aurelius, however, can neither accept her from her husband nor pay the magician with whom the squire has lowered himself to deal.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/263326">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Aurora&#039;s Ascent: Conflict and Desire in the Medieval Dawn-Song]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[In a remarkably innovative use of received tradition, the aubades in TC reveal personalities, adumbrate the end of the story, and inspire a fresh aubade tradition in English poetry.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275304">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Ausgewählte Canterbury-Erzählungen: Englisch und Deutsch.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Item not seen. WorldCat link to table of contents indicates that the selections (in English and in German with notes) include GP (selections), MilPT, RvPT, CkPT, WBPT, FrPT, SumPT, PardPT, and ShT, with an introduction, pp. vii-xvi.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271544">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Austin, Joyce, O&#039;Brian, and Chaucer&#039;s Squire: Bakhtin and Medieval Narratology]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Unlike &quot;free-indirect discourse,&quot; Bakhtin&#039;s &quot;hybrid discourse&quot; readily allows analysis of written and spoken language in narrative, especially in texts before 1900. The portrait of the Squire, hybridizing both estates satire and &quot;Le Roman de la Rose,&quot; thus narratorially balances inherently mixed evaluations of his character.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272797">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association 1969. Proceedings and Papers of the Twelfth Congress Held at the University of Western Australia, 5-11 February 1969]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Includes three essays that pertain to Chaucer and brief synopses of three additional ones that are not included in the volume:  Stephen Knight, &quot;Rhetoric and Poetry in &#039;The Franklin&#039;s Tale&#039;&#039;&#039;; H. E. Hallam, &quot;The Throne of Chaunticleer&quot;; and Brian Parker, &quot;Bar Salibi&#039;s Mystical Commentary on the Erotic Imagery of the Song of Songs&quot; (including comments on MerT). For the three complete essays, search for Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association 1969 under Alternative Title..]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274442">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Authenticating Realism and the Realism of Chaucer.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores the narrative devices used by modern and premodern writers of fiction to establish &quot;an air of truth or plausibility&quot;--first-person point of view, intimate tone, details drawn from the real world, and various &quot;tricks&quot; used to compel readers to suspend their disbelief. Comments on Scriptural realism and that of saints&#039; lives and dream visions, examining Chaucer&#039;s techniques in BD, TC, and CT, particularly their framing devices, with attention to the &quot;circumstantial realism&quot; of the frame of CT and its productive tensions with ideals expressed in the tales.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275484">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Author Attributions in Medieval Text Collections: An Exploration.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Offers six case studies of multi-text manuscripts to investigate &quot;medieval concepts of authorship and . . . constructions of authority.&quot; Shows that Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Arch. Selden B.24 (including TC, PF, Truth, Mars, Venus, LGW, and nineteen works by other writers) is an &quot;attempt to create an anthology coherent in theme(s) and . . . poetic form,&quot; inaugurated by TC. Paratextual references to Chaucer as author is &quot;a key means&quot; to achieve coherence]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271326">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Author, Authority and Orality]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Explores the &quot;tensions&quot; between the narrator and &quot;author-subject&quot; of TC, assessing how (as in other medieval works) the author&#039;s &quot;signature&quot; is found within the narrative rather than in its paratext.  Such embedded signatures are characteristic of pre-print literature, as is uncertainty about authority.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271884">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Author, Reader, Book: Medieval Authorship in Theory and Practice]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Collection of essays related to medieval concepts of authorship, focusing on a variety of vernaculars, languages, and literatures, and the &quot;relationship of authorship to readership.&quot; For two essays that pertain to Chaucer, search for Author, Reader, Book under Alternative Title.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277380">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Author, Scribe, and Book in Late Medieval English Literature.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Focuses on fifteenth-century writers such as Audelay, Hoccleve, Kempe, and Charles d&#039;Orléans, and shows how these authors fashioned themselves as self-publishing and scribes in their own right. Argues that this modeling was influenced by Chaucer, among others, whose Adam frames Chaucer as almost a scribe.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270015">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Author, Scribe, and Curse: The Genre of &#039;Adam Scriveyn&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reading Adam as a specimen of the genre of book curses reveals a tension in Adam between the incipient humanist idea of the author, &quot;whose inventions transcend their scribal incarnations,&quot; and the reality in late medieval London of authors&#039; dependence on an increasingly professionalized and hence powerful cadre of scribes.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/274859">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Author, Text, and Paratext in Early Modern Editions of the &quot;Legend of Good Women.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Claims that LGW may have been viewed in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries as a response to TC and as an allegory for how Chaucer may have interacted with patrons.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/277700">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Author&#039;s Revision in Block C of the &quot;Canterbury Tales.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses manuscript variants and stemmata, relations with source material, and &quot;scribal characteristics&quot; of PhyT to explain that they indicate scribal rather than authorial alteration. Argues that similar evidence, plus comparison with alterations from LGWP-F to LGWP-G and stylistic factors, indicate that Chaucer revised the Phy-Pard Link. Also argues that the epilogue to PardT shows no evidence of having been composed later the Tale itself.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261638">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Authorial Revision in Some Late-Medieval English Texts]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Surveys how editions of Chaucer, Gower, Langland, and others have banished the notion of authorial revision from their textual methods and replaced it with attention to scribal practice, thereby paralleling deconstructive criticism.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275025">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Authorial Second Lives: Machaut, Chaucer, and Philip Roth.]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Reviews and extends arguments for recognizing the intertextual relations of Chaucer&#039;s LGW and the works of Guillaume de Machaut, emphasizing their explorations of the &quot;poetics of authorship.&quot; Extends this notion to the fiction of Philip Roth and suggests that such self-consciousness derives from the &quot;cultural moment&quot; of authorial celebrity that enables these writers--medieval and modern--to explore and exploit &quot;textual second lives&quot; in their narratives.<br />
]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/262808">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Authorial Versions, Rolling Revision, Scribal Error? Or, The Truth about &#039;Truth&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Focusing on Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Truth&#039;, Hanna examines external evidence, individual variations, and the condition of the manuscripts themselves to illustrate the difficulty of distinguishing authorial revisions from scribal errors and alterations in Chaucerian texts.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/269550">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Authorial Work]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Robertson explores effects of the English labor laws of 1349 on attitudes toward writing, surveying reactions by various writers and using Chaucer&#039;s GP &quot;as a lens through which to view the critical stakes in thinking about&quot; work--particularly the tension between labor and leisure.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/275239">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Authority (Familial, Political, Written) in the &quot;Clerk&#039;s Tale.&quot;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Argues that ClP &quot;confronts the social politics of translation and accessibility&quot; after which the &quot;re-vernacularization&quot; in ClT &quot;progresses . . . toward class and gender accessibility,&quot; &quot;addresses the politics of tyranny and class,&quot; and engages issues of authority, freedom, and sovereignty found elsewhere in the CT. Designed for pedagogical use, includes several questions for discussion.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/270324">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Authority and Character in Middle English Literature]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[&quot;This study argues that, in major Middle English works, authority is the central issue involved in concepts of character and of relationships beween characters. &#039;Havelok the Dane,&#039; &#039;King Horn,&#039; &#039;Sir Orfeo,&#039; Malory&#039;s works, and &#039;The Canterbury Tales&#039; examine the question of what gives one man power over another and this question is the central concern of these works . . . .  Chaucer examines authority . . . on three levels, mainly: the relation between author and reader, between characters on the pilgrimage,  and between characters within the tales. And at each of these levels authority is an ambivalent matter.&quot;]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/272461">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Authority and Diplomacy from Dante to Shakespeare]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[&quot;Examines the duality of the roles of author and ambassador through a study of the connection between the discourses and practices of authority and diplomacy in the literature of the late medieval and early modern periods.&quot; Essays &quot;argue that concepts of diplomacy and of the diplomatic are central in English literature and culture of the period under review.&quot; Chaucer is mentioned only occasionally.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/261733">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Authority and Interpretation in Chaucer&#039;s &#039;Tale of Melibee&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Although critics have generally seen Mel as a simple allegory in fairly close translation, the Tale departs from Renaud in significant ways to question the nature of authority (good advice can be wrong; authorities can disagree; motivations can subvert).  Mel is integral to CT, not anomalous.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/271046">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Authority and Interpretation in the &#039;House of Fame&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Considers the three-part structure of HF, the poem&#039;s references to Virgil&#039;s &quot;Aeneid,&quot; and its allusions to Dante&#039;s &quot;Divine Comedy&quot; and to Ezekiel, arguing that, thematically, it abandons history as a source of truth, considers the potential of poetry, and concludes in a &quot;kind of eschaton.&quot; i.e., in the biblically-inspired hope of &quot;deferred understanding,&quot; despite human limitations.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description><rdf:Description rdf:about="https://chaucer.lib.utsa.edu/items/show/266734">
    <dcterms:title><![CDATA[Authority and the Defense of Fiction: Renaissance Poetics and Chaucer&#039;s &#039;House of Fame&#039;]]></dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:description><![CDATA[Assesses the presentation of HF in Speght&#039;s edition as an example of &quot;Renaissance uneasiness&quot; with the poem.  Explains this uneasiness by contrasting HF with Sidney&#039;s &quot;Apologie for Poetrie&quot; (and Boccaccio&#039;s &quot;Genealogie deorum gentilium libri&quot;), arguing that Chaucer&#039;s rhetoric-based and &quot;paradox-oriented&quot; poetics differ from Sidney&#039;s more confident and philosophical theory of poetry.]]></dcterms:description>
</rdf:Description></rdf:RDF>